If the moon landing was faked...

A *link* is not proof. A cite to an actual, existing, verifiable document is
Nproof. *Never* accept a website as proof of anything involving NASA;
at
best, it would be a copy of an actual piece of paper, even if it were an
actual NASA website.
Scott Hedrick,
Now even a fully certified link to an official NASA page is getting the
moonboot kick in the butt, especially if there's anything the least bit
skewed or potentially capable of getting interpreted that doesen't
reinforce their NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century. Imagine that,
and why am I not the least bit surprised.

I suppose next they'll have to start their evidence excluding upon
their very own archives of most all of those NASA/Apollo Kodak moments,
including those more interesting ones of somewhat if not entirely of
better science as having been obtained from orbit.
-
Brad Guth

Scott Hedrick;
A *link* is not proof. A cite to an actual, existing, verifiable document
is proof. *Never* accept a website as proof of anything involving NASA;
at best, it would be a copy of an actual piece of paper, even if it were
an actual NASA website.
Scott Hedrick,
Now even a fully certified link to an official NASA page is getting the
Usenet moonboot kick in the butt, especially if there's anything the
least bit skewed or potentially capable of such getting interpreted
that doesn't reinforce their NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century.
Imagine that, and why am I not the least bit surprised.

I suppose next they'll have to start their evidence excluding upon
their very own archives of most all of those NASA/Apollo Kodak moments,
especially of all those EVA obtained images and perhaps even having to
include those more interesting ones of somewhat if not entirely of
better science as having been obtained robotically from orbit.

You are ending up in killfiles because we killfiled him and don't want to
read what he has to say, or what anyone says in response to him.
That's because I'm more often than not been sufficiently right about
most everything I've uncovered. Imagine that, they don't much care for
hearing the truth and nothing but the truth. Of course, neither did
their Hitler or GW Bush.

BTW; you don't have to agree with me if your best available swag has
anything that can be replicated as backing it up.
-
Brad Guth

edrho,
Don't be "sorry", especially not to all these cloak and dagger
rusemasters.

According to our MI/NSA/CIA (aka NASA/Apollo) Usenet e-spook "Scott
Hedrick";
A *link* is not proof. A cite to an actual, existing, verifiable document
is proof. *Never* accept a website as proof of anything involving NASA;
at best, it would be a copy of an actual piece of paper, even if it were
an actual NASA website.
Scott Hedrick,
Now it seems even a fully certified link to an official NASA page is
getting their Usenet moonboot kick in the butt, especially if there's
anything the least bit skewed or potentially capable of such info
getting interpreted in any way that doesn't 100+% reinforce their
NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century. Imagine that, and why am I not
the least bit surprised.

I suppose next they'll have to start in with their evidence excluding
upon their very own archives of most all of those hocus-pocus
NASA/Apollo Kodak moments, especially of all those optically unfiltered
EVA obtained images and perhaps even having to include those more
interesting ones of somewhat if not entirely of what's offering us
better/believable science as having been obtained robotically from
orbit.

Our warm and fuzzy "Scott Hedrick" also had this to say as a warning or
e-threat to those taking any interest in whatever my contributions had
to offer. In other words, contribute to one of my topics and you're
worse off than dead meat, or even worse yet than if you were hiding WMD
or Usama bin Laden.
You are ending up in killfiles because we killfiled him and don't want to
read what he has to say, or what anyone says in response to him.
I do believe that's actually because I'm more often than not having
become sufficiently right about most everything I've uncovered.
Imagine that, they don't much care for sharing the truth and nothing
but the truth, or having to deal with those regular laws of physics,
much less are they being the least bit receptive to whatever
alternative evidence is being shared that doesn't have their
NASA/Apollo stamp of approval. Of course, neither did their Hitler or
GW Bush appreciate hearing the truth.

BTW; you folks don't have to always agree with me, especially if your
best available swag has anything that can be replicated as backing
whatever mindset you've got to work with.
-
Brad Guth

If the first moon landing was faked, why do more?

To keep the conscience of the masses off contraversial real events like
nam which the Government wanted to prolong as much as possible, not
caring for the taxpayers (masses) of USA or any other country. And it
worked for a while. When the interest wained, Nasa juiced it up by
faking a disaster during Apollo 13 on the 13th of April (9-11 hint
hint). And that worked for a few years, so they came up with the first
Mars mission. And that worked, but by then, nam was in it's death rows
and Nasa had no reason for a manned mission to mars or something
ridiculous. All the pieces can be put together like a puzzle. And of
course to get the usa into another war, errr the poor slaughtered
again, the Gov't came up with 9-11. Nothing new under the sun. Hint
Hint. Pearl Harbor, sinking of the Lucitania to get the world masses to
fight in WWI, and back and back we go to the Bible, also created by the
same crowd to control the gentile and make them more civil so they
would be better servants. As long as mankind has been around, there
have been this hierarchy. It's natural. A hierarchy exists with every
species on the planet. It's actually a good thing in a way provided the
guys at the top of the control chain are moral/ decent and above all,
fair FOR ALL, at least the results (the end justifies the means).

If the first moon landing was faked, why do more?

To keep the conscience of the masses off contraversial real events like
vietnam, which the Government wanted to prolong as much as possible,
not caring for the taxpayers (masses) of USA or any other country. And
it worked for a while. When the interest wained, Nasa juiced it up by
faking a disaster during Apollo 13 on the 13th of April (9-11 hint
hint). And that worked for a few years, so they came up with the first
Mars mission. And that worked, but by then, nam was in it's death
throws and Nasa had no reason for a manned mission to mars or something
ridiculous. All the pieces can be put together like a puzzle. And of
course to get the usa into another war, errr the poor slaughtered
again, the Gov't came up with 9-11. Nothing new under the sun: the list
is long, Pearl Harbor (WWII), sinking of the Lucitania to instigate
WWI, and back and back we go to the Bible and beyond. I believe the
bible was created by the same crowd to control errr scare the gentile
and make them more civil so they would be better servants. As long as
mankind has existed, there has been this hierarchy. It's natural. A
hierarchy exists with every species on the planet. A hierarchy can
actually work out for the betterment of all provided those at the top
of the control chain are moral/decent and above all, fair FOR ALL, at
least in the end (where the end justifies the means).

On 9 May 2006 04:50:37 GMT, (Andre Lieven)
wrote:

Mr. Liebergot, Brad Guth is a well known kook whose insanity only
starts at " we never landed on the Moon "

....Pot. Kettle. Andre.

RE-PLONK
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On Tue, 9 May 2006 02:36:41 +0000, Sy Liebergot
wrote:

I normally ignore this provocative subject,

....And normally this would be the proper course of action. However,
Guthball's proven he needs to be taken care of in the way Buzz did
Sibrel, albeit in his case a 2x4 across the face and hands would be
more apropos.

since there are some of you
psuedo-scientists and engineeers bloviating here that haven't a year's
formal science training or common sense among you. As a "front-line"
Flight Controller in Mission Control and an integral participant for
the entire Apollo Program, I will tell you unequivocally that we did
indeed sucessfully land humans on the Moon and return them safely to
Earth on all the missions so reported. If you continue to believe
otherwise, then I can only assume that you're off your meds or are
communicating from some loony bin. Or perhaps you desire to sell books
to other people with "tin foil hats."
Sy Liebergot
"Apollo EECOM: Journey of a lifetime"

....Ah, but you were part of the *conspiracy*. You know, the one where
we refuse to admit that Guth's interpretation of a photo of a cheese
pizza is proof that life exists on Mars...er, Venus.
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On Sat, 06 May 2006 13:30:41 GMT, PowerPost2000 wrote:

If the first moon landing was faked, why do more?

....Apparently they spent a bundle on the extra FX footage, and didn't
want any to go to waste. Which explains why A12 had to abort their TV
coverage when the footage got eaten up by the film chain, and some
NASA PAO dweeb failed to secure a backup copy.
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On 10 May 2006 07:37:32 -0700, wrote:

See? Although he brought back the "borg" reference and dropped "incest
clone" this time. There isn't a lot of difference.

....He finally realized that bashing clones created via incest was, in
fact, bashing himself.
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On 15 May 2006 02:33:47 -0700, wrote:

So I ask again.

....No, you won't. Killfile Brad Guth *NOW* and put the willingly
molested ******* out of our misery. Enough is ****ing enough, Ed.
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[