#21
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
Dear Martin,
Here in America, secondary school standards have gone down. But, we now educate a larger proportion of the population. And, I keep expecting my students to have the sort of education that I had at Bronx High School of Science in the 1960's. That is unfair, since this school is probably the best school in the USA. best Penny Still, whatever happened to spherical trig, solid geometry, and the law of tangents in the high schools C.,? Instituting A levels here, would be a BIG improvement. There is starting to be some use of the international Bac., at the better schools. It's hard to believe the people actually think standards have gone down - they have utterly forgotten what education was really like for half to three-quarters of the population. Right. In America, high schools were rather good in my dad's day ( 1930's) when 2% of the population achieved a college prep degree. They are somewhat worse now that 75% of the population achieves a college prep degree. Oh, Horrors, the sky is falling. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
Dear j,
I hope they haven't just been delayed. best Penny But be thankful Gene got his future history wrong - we've been spared the Eugenics Wars. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
Dear j,
I hope they haven't just been delayed. best Penny But be thankful Gene got his future history wrong - we've been spared the Eugenics Wars. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
Dear john,
Much thanks. Best Penny I know the name Wiley Ley well, but cannot remember much. Will have a google after this. Seeking "Willy Ley" might be more effective. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
Dear john,
Much thanks. Best Penny I know the name Wiley Ley well, but cannot remember much. Will have a google after this. Seeking "Willy Ley" might be more effective. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:22:06 +0100, Jonathan Silverlight
wrote: In message , Dr Robin Bignall writes On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:09:51 +0100, Martin Frey wrote: Dr Robin Bignall wrote: I did not say that I got a bad education; merely that my school did not take exams. In fact, the majority of my teachers were ex-service, and vastly overqualified for teaching young erks such as me. The guy who taught me maths was an ex-regular soldier who had been a gunnery instructor. What he didn't know about the sort of maths I needed at 15 wasn't worth knowing. SNIP Forgive my presumption. No problem. I thought the school was lousy until I grew up and found that kids seemed to know less about the three R's than we did in 1950. Set theory will, however, be invaluable to them when they are watching TV or shopping. IIRC, Robert Heinlein writes about children learning set theory in his novel "Beyond This Horizon" (1942) Even in his worst nightmares I doubt he expected it would actually happen. And as for idiocies like Initial Teaching Alphabet..... Quite! Rant But, I expect that the ageist world of today, where to get that elusive 15 minutes on TV one has to have a physical (and certainly mental) age of less than a backward 16, considers anyone over 40 to be past it and an old duffer. /Rant As if we give a damn! -- wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall Quiet part of Hertfordshire England http://homepage.ntlworld.com/docrobin/homepage.htm |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:22:06 +0100, Jonathan Silverlight
wrote: In message , Dr Robin Bignall writes On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:09:51 +0100, Martin Frey wrote: Dr Robin Bignall wrote: I did not say that I got a bad education; merely that my school did not take exams. In fact, the majority of my teachers were ex-service, and vastly overqualified for teaching young erks such as me. The guy who taught me maths was an ex-regular soldier who had been a gunnery instructor. What he didn't know about the sort of maths I needed at 15 wasn't worth knowing. SNIP Forgive my presumption. No problem. I thought the school was lousy until I grew up and found that kids seemed to know less about the three R's than we did in 1950. Set theory will, however, be invaluable to them when they are watching TV or shopping. IIRC, Robert Heinlein writes about children learning set theory in his novel "Beyond This Horizon" (1942) Even in his worst nightmares I doubt he expected it would actually happen. And as for idiocies like Initial Teaching Alphabet..... Quite! Rant But, I expect that the ageist world of today, where to get that elusive 15 minutes on TV one has to have a physical (and certainly mental) age of less than a backward 16, considers anyone over 40 to be past it and an old duffer. /Rant As if we give a damn! -- wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall Quiet part of Hertfordshire England http://homepage.ntlworld.com/docrobin/homepage.htm |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
On 08 Jul 2003 01:54:01 GMT, (PSmith9626) wrote:
Dear Martin, Here in America, secondary school standards have gone down. But, we now educate a larger proportion of the population. And, I keep expecting my students to have the sort of education that I had at Bronx High School of Science in the 1960's. That is unfair, since this school is probably the best school in the USA. best Penny Still, whatever happened to spherical trig, solid geometry, and the law of tangents in the high schools C.,? Instituting A levels here, would be a BIG improvement. There is starting to be some use of the international Bac., at the better schools. It's hard to believe the people actually think standards have gone down - they have utterly forgotten what education was really like for half to three-quarters of the population. Right. In America, high schools were rather good in my dad's day ( 1930's) when 2% of the population achieved a college prep degree. They are somewhat worse now that 75% of the population achieves a college prep degree. But are those college prep degrees (whatever they are?) today of the same standard as the one your dad took? Oh, Horrors, the sky is falling. It probably has fallen and nobody noticed. -- wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall Quiet part of Hertfordshire England http://homepage.ntlworld.com/docrobin/homepage.htm |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur C.Clarke
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:37:30 GMT, Ned Kelly
wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:16:04 +0100, Dr Robin Bignall sat down and wrote: On 08 Jul 2003 01:56:53 GMT, (PSmith9626) wrote: Dear Robin, Right. I have just finished the biography of Isador Rabi. His dad was uneducated and worked at Odd jobs, and Rabi's opinion was that he was just as smart as his Nobel Laureate child. best Penny Uneducated does not equal stupid. The biggest problem with the secondary modern system is that it assumes that kids have reached their full potential at 11, which is not the case for all by any means. What about the brilliant children who have serious emotional issues? Do they get a second chance? Not under the 11+ system. They do actually, you just don't know it! Listen sunshine, I went through the 11+ system in 1950, as an 11 year-old late developer with emotional problems. You don't know what you are talking about, so I suggest you just STF up. -- wrmst rgrds Robin Bignall Quiet part of Hertfordshire England http://homepage.ntlworld.com/docrobin/homepage.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Arthur C. Clarkes 86th BDay | Andrew Gray | History | 27 | December 27th 03 02:56 PM |
Arthur C. Clarkes 86th BDay | Andrew Gray | Policy | 2 | December 17th 03 06:58 PM |
Arthur C. Clarkes 86th BDay | Chris Jones | History | 0 | December 16th 03 06:56 PM |
Arthur C. Clarke's 86th B'Day | Michael Gallagher | Policy | 0 | December 16th 03 03:39 PM |
NEWS - Bush May Announce Return To Moon At Kitty Hawk - Space Daily | Rusty B | History | 118 | November 11th 03 06:00 PM |