|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
"lechergod" wrote in message
ups.com h aha hahahahaah KvekIT / Date: Thurs, Nov 30 2006 12:24 pm If you rely on the last 500 years, it is not evident to point out China as a great culture and technology source. But if you go back a little further, China was the most advanced civ of the world. China will be again the most advanced civ soon. Its domination will have left place to european civs for a few centuries. But it is heading for success again. 500 years will be the duration of european domination. What will be next is very hard to predict, but China will soon be back as a powerful empire. Unlike yourself, I think China represents a rather intellectually powerful empire as is, and certainly scientifically it isn't all that far behind, if at all. It takes spare energy in order to produce/reproduce products and services. China has spare energy and obviously more than a sufficient number of intelligent folks that are not about to let such go to waste. Short of natural disasters or the fiasco of our perpetrating the world into WW-III, there's nothing keeping China from the holy grail of owning our moon's L1. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
Just wondering as to how much if any of theis 'soc.culture.china' NG of
Usenet is available to the general public of China? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
KvekIT wrote: Are you ok? He's not OK. He's just the usual communist dog lecher dog telling lies and cheating again yelling slogans making quarrels to seal dissenters mouths arsehole licking lice. I'm just imitating him to annoy and agitate him. Until he learn to use proper English, I will continue to harrass, annoy, agitate and goat him. hahahahahahahahahaha lechergod wrote: ha ha h ahaha this communists' dog is really brain-washed to be such a fool !!! just take hearsay to be screwed in full !!! ha ha hahahaha since this communists' dog had got soul-sold, so cannot see how the dynasty changes so frequently and how anti-harmonic within each dynasty is. liars can only hear to lies-telling and can only rely on such lies !!! that is the only way for communists' dogs !!!! h aha hahahahaah KvekIT wrote: captain. wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message news:eae6e59d5164ece11a955239ae99df47.49644@mygate .mailgate.org... flush Besides, I'm absolutely certain that China will know exactly what to do. So, why are so many of you folks getting yourselves so gosh darn huffy or otherwise naysay about all of this? Just because you don't have a masters degree in Chinese Mandarin doesn't mean that we're out of luck. That's because China being smarter than us, as such they'll learn our language (as many already have) in order to accommodate their less fortunate (Mandarin illiterate) clients, such as us. if they are so great, what have they contributed in the last 500 years to the rest of the world? sure, some things, but the country of china hardly comes to mind when one thinks of great leaps forward in culture and technology. if they are superior, as you suggest, then let them prove it by achieving great accomplishments. If you rely on the last 500 years, it is not evident to point out China as a great culture and technology source. But if you go back a little further, China was the most advanced civ of the world. China will be again the most advanced civ soon. Its domination will have left place to european civs for a few centuries. But it is heading for success again. 500 years will be the duration of european domination. What will be next is very hard to predict, but China will soon be back as a powerful empire. -- http://geocities.com/lechergod/predict.htm owner of email declared in http://geocities.com/lechergod that --- REAL --- lechergod is using NNTP-POSTING-HOST : cm218-254-185-182.hkcable.com.hk. all ******* of falsifying "lechergod" had just presented their mothers to be ****ed by lechergod, but are not entitled to use such email. *** THE *******S CANNOT MADE THE SIGNATURE IN VERY THIN COLOUR !!! *** --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:4aefd681278600ca9728f22aadcf26c1.49644@mygate .mailgate.org Just wondering as to how much if any of theis 'soc.culture.china' NG of Usenet is available to the general public of China? In other words, anything of "soc.culture.china" is every bit as much of a pathetic ruse as for all the rest of this MI/NSA~KGB skewed Usenet that's anti China, as much as being anti Muslim or simply anti to whatever rocks thy Old Testament boat. Gee whiz, folks, why am I not surprised that such bigotry, arrogance and lack of remorse has become part of our genetic DNA code. http://groups.google.com/groups?lnk=...i.lang.chinese Oddly, Usenet's "sci.lang.chinese" group doesn't even coexist as an option within Mailgate/Usenet, yet it's sort of there to behold within GOOGLE/Usenet naysay land of potential US/China usage, that is if it were ever allowed by our own kind to do so. talk.politics.china is however in both GOOGLE/Mailgate places, though seems a touch unlikely to have any appropriate interest in science or that of applied space technology. Not that China hasn't in the past kept a tight lid on whatever their kind could or could not do, however, clearly as of the last couple of decades it is the all-knowing gods and wizards of our Usenet and especially the likes of Mailgate.org or worse sorts of Bigots-R-Us Usenet servers that's being anti-China, and it is not actually the other way around. Perhaps what's needed instead of "sci.lang.chinese" is "sci.usa.bigot", or perhaps old.testament.upyours that's in need of being right up front and in their face. After all, it was our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s) that wasted all of those decades and of the trillions upon trillions worth of our resources upon pretending that the US/USSR thing was real, when in fact it wasn't. (it's what supposed super-powers do to one another, because it makes the rest of us village idiots pay and pay and pay for it all, and then some) - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
"lecherdog" wrote in message
ups.com KvekIT wrote: Are you ok? He's not OK. He's just the usual communist dog lecher dog telling lies and cheating again yelling slogans making quarrels to seal dissenters mouths arsehole licking lice. I'm just imitating him to annoy and agitate him. Until he learn to use proper English, I will continue to harrass, annoy, agitate and goat him. hahahahahahahahahaha In other words, putting the likes of Christ on a stick is what you'd call being ok. Taking from others, especially if they're Muslim or Cathar, is what you'd call being ok. That must be why you're not constructively contributing to the topic at hand, because it involves honest to god physics and of replicated science that anyone with so much as half a village idiot brain could take to the bank. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
Brad Guth wrote: Just wondering as to how much if any of theis 'soc.culture.china' NG of Usenet is available to the general public of China? You haven'y been paying attention in this ng. There have been many people from within China itself participating in discussion within SCC. They said they can access soc.culture.china readily and without problem. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
"lecherdog" wrote in message
ups.com You haven'y been paying attention in this ng. There have been many people from within China itself participating in discussion within SCC. They said they can access soc.culture.china readily and without problem. Thanks much, as I had been wondering about that, especially since so many here in this anti-think-tank of Usenet naysay land seem rather bent upon enforcing their Old Testament mindset, or else. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
Most folks are still not being allowed to appreciate our moon's L1. Of
course, most Americans are still pretty much dumbfounded and/or having been snookered about a great many such important things in this infomercial skewed life as we've been allowed to know of. Perhaps those more intelligent members in support of the China National Space Administration/CNSA are as such less snookered than we're giving them credit for. Basically, the average free-gravity-zone of this moon L1 is supposedly r33.5~r34 away from the moon and otherwise merely r51 from Earth (unfortunately there's still no hard-scientific and thus independently replicated proof of such actually being the case of those specific numbers), that's worthy of obtaining micro if not nano and even pico gravity, although nearly any +/- adjustment in the net gravity can be accommodated and rather efficiently interactively sustained. Within this interactive moon L1 pocket (+/- wherever it has to be) there should be as little as 1% the atoms/cm3 and of the required velocity is roughly 9 fold less than LEO (those factors alone represent a rather huge reduction in orbital friction, and thereby greatly minimizing station-keeping energy demands). There's also no pesky gauntlet of Van Allen belt radiation or SAA like nasty pocket of magnetosphere stored radiation. It's also nearly always sunny as well as having either earthshine and/or moonshine at your disposal, and of that moonshine so happens to include a great deal of useful secondary/recoil photons in the IR/FIR spectrum, plus offering loads of gamma and hard-X-rays because there's so little mass between L1 and the highly reactive naked surface of the physically dark and cosmic morgue that's represented by our moon. The moon's L1 is not technically a problem for most robotics, however our frail DNA will demand a great amount of shielding that's similar to 8 meters of water, and for any long term (multi year) human involvement demanding 16 meters of water unless an artificial magnetosphere can be sustained. There's also the pesky matter of having to survive various meteors of potentially lethal flak that isn't the least bit moderated in velocity nor being gravity diverted. This fancy enough "Clarke Station" document that's nicely revised and certainly rather interesting but otherwise seriously outdated, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications...aryland01b.pdf not to mention way under-shielded unless incorporating 8+ meters of water plus having somehow established an artificial magnetosphere, or perhaps incorporating 16+ meters of h2o if w/o magnetosphere (shielding that's necessary because it's parked within 60,000 km from our physically dark and otherwise highly reactive moon that's continually providing such a not so DNA friendly TBI worth of gamma and hard-X-rays), is simply a downright deficient document about sharing the positive science and constructive habitat/depot considerations for utilizing the moon's L1. In fact, there's hardly any mention of the tremendous L1 benefits to humanity, much less as to space exploration or the daunting task of salvaging our mascon warmed environment, and it's still not having squat to do with any primary task of actually developing, exploiting or otherwise terraforming the moon itself. On the other hand, whereas the CM/ISS portion of the LSE which I've proposed offers 50t/m2 of outter shell or hull shielding for accommodating the 1e9 m3 interior, thereby multiple decades if not an entire lifetime can be afforded, as to safely accommodating our frail DNA. That may seem like a rather great amount of tonnage deployment, though eventually 99.9% is derived from the moon itself. Of course, don't mind anything that I have to suggest, whereas you can keep thinking as small and/or as insignificant as you'd like. However, our having remained as LEO/terrestrial sequestered isn't going to help us explore, pillage and rape the other planets and of their moons, not to mention the mining and/or possible terraforming potential of digging into our very own global warming moon that's chuck full of nifty and rare elements. I guess what's needed is an open mindset that isn't afraid of it's own shadow, that isn't afraid of making a few honest mistakes nor demonstrating that perhaps we're not exactly the smartest nor the most entitled species of DNA in this universe. (sorry about that) - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
Brad, just get your ass over to rec.org,mensa, and shout about it, and
I promise I'll dig in a bit, thereafter. --' foolsrushin.' Brad Guth wrote: Most folks are still not being allowed to appreciate our moon's L1. Of course, most Americans are still pretty much dumbfounded and/or having been snookered about a great many such important things in this infomercial skewed life as we've been allowed to know of. Perhaps those more intelligent members in support of the China National Space Administration/CNSA are as such less snookered than we're giving them credit for. Basically, the average free-gravity-zone of this moon L1 is supposedly r33.5~r34 away from the moon and otherwise merely r51 from Earth (unfortunately there's still no hard-scientific and thus independently replicated proof of such actually being the case of those specific numbers), that's worthy of obtaining micro if not nano and even pico gravity, although nearly any +/- adjustment in the net gravity can be accommodated and rather efficiently interactively sustained. Within this interactive moon L1 pocket (+/- wherever it has to be) there should be as little as 1% the atoms/cm3 and of the required velocity is roughly 9 fold less than LEO (those factors alone represent a rather huge reduction in orbital friction, and thereby greatly minimizing station-keeping energy demands). There's also no pesky gauntlet of Van Allen belt radiation or SAA like nasty pocket of magnetosphere stored radiation. It's also nearly always sunny as well as having either earthshine and/or moonshine at your disposal, and of that moonshine so happens to include a great deal of useful secondary/recoil photons in the IR/FIR spectrum, plus offering loads of gamma and hard-X-rays because there's so little mass between L1 and the highly reactive naked surface of the physically dark and cosmic morgue that's represented by our moon. The moon's L1 is not technically a problem for most robotics, however our frail DNA will demand a great amount of shielding that's similar to 8 meters of water, and for any long term (multi year) human involvement demanding 16 meters of water unless an artificial magnetosphere can be sustained. There's also the pesky matter of having to survive various meteors of potentially lethal flak that isn't the least bit moderated in velocity nor being gravity diverted. This fancy enough "Clarke Station" document that's nicely revised and certainly rather interesting but otherwise seriously outdated, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications...aryland01b.pdf not to mention way under-shielded unless incorporating 8+ meters of water plus having somehow established an artificial magnetosphere, or perhaps incorporating 16+ meters of h2o if w/o magnetosphere (shielding that's necessary because it's parked within 60,000 km from our physically dark and otherwise highly reactive moon that's continually providing such a not so DNA friendly TBI worth of gamma and hard-X-rays), is simply a downright deficient document about sharing the positive science and constructive habitat/depot considerations for utilizing the moon's L1. In fact, there's hardly any mention of the tremendous L1 benefits to humanity, much less as to space exploration or the daunting task of salvaging our mascon warmed environment, and it's still not having squat to do with any primary task of actually developing, exploiting or otherwise terraforming the moon itself. On the other hand, whereas the CM/ISS portion of the LSE which I've proposed offers 50t/m2 of outter shell or hull shielding for accommodating the 1e9 m3 interior, thereby multiple decades if not an entire lifetime can be afforded, as to safely accommodating our frail DNA. That may seem like a rather great amount of tonnage deployment, though eventually 99.9% is derived from the moon itself. Of course, don't mind anything that I have to suggest, whereas you can keep thinking as small and/or as insignificant as you'd like. However, our having remained as LEO/terrestrial sequestered isn't going to help us explore, pillage and rape the other planets and of their moons, not to mention the mining and/or possible terraforming potential of digging into our very own global warming moon that's chuck full of nifty and rare elements. I guess what's needed is an open mindset that isn't afraid of it's own shadow, that isn't afraid of making a few honest mistakes nor demonstrating that perhaps we're not exactly the smartest nor the most entitled species of DNA in this universe. (sorry about that) - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon
"'foolsrushin.'" wrote in message
ups.com Brad, just get your ass over to rec.org,mensa, and shout about it, and I promise I'll dig in a bit, thereafter. You'd think, but thus far the types of folks in ROM seem as though rather deathly afraid of their own shadow, especially those shadows of having depicted their brown noses continually sucked up to the infomercial buttology of whatever their status quo collective mindset has to say. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
War in Iraq -- Moon on the Moon Hoax -- Proof of Life After Death -- Man as Old as Coal -- Catholic Gospels Corrupt -- Extraterrestrials, UFOs | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 15th 06 01:40 AM |
Of what's become nondisclosure/taboo | Jonathan Silverlight | SETI | 25 | September 22nd 05 11:10 PM |
'Christmas is taboo in America, but now people are fighting back' | Jmpngtiger | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 21st 04 12:19 AM |
BLUE MOON IN JULY,search 2x new moon FEB 2052/sky telesc | Don McDonald | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 8th 04 03:37 AM |
Will Bush nuke the moon? Will the black hole bomb be tested on the moon first? | Jan Panteltje | Astronomy Misc | 3 | December 6th 03 05:41 PM |