|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory
Painius I do not agree that todays science leads to a dead end. I do
think it needs a brighter light at the end of rthe tunnel TreBert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory
Bert wrote, replying to Painius:
...I do not agree that todays science leads to a dead end. Bert, he's referrin' specifically and exclusively to the arena of cosmology, astrophysics and theoretical physics. That is where science has impaled itself on the 'no medium', space-as-void dogma which forever precludes understanding the mechanism of gravity and conciliation of QM and relativity. I do think it needs a brighter light at the end of rthe tunnel. Yeah, replace the "void" of space with the universe-filling, fluidic Plenum of space that's compessible/expansible and amenable to density gradients. Until this simple adjustment to the sitting paradigm is made, cosmology will remain a dilemma impaled upon the rapacious horns of an enigma. * |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory
"Saul Levy" wrote in message...
... On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:42:34 -0500, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Painius I do not agree that todays science leads to a dead end. I do think it needs a brighter light at the end of rthe tunnel TreBert You so sure it won't be a TRAIN, . . . ? lmfjao! . . . Saul Levy I had to think about that for a minute. Good one, Saul. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: "You can't have a light without a dark to stick it in." Arlo Guthrie P.P.S.: http://Astronomy.painellsworth.net http://PoisonFalls.painellsworth.net http://TheInternetStory.painellsworth.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ... Painius I do not agree that todays science leads to a dead end. I do think it needs a brighter light at the end of rthe tunnel TreBert No, Bert, you're right. Science does not lead to a dead end. Science will eventually dig itself out of the quagmire it's in. What i said is that science IS AT a dead end. And it will remain stuck in the mud as long as it persists with an oversimplified concept of space. Physics got off track when Occam's razor was applied to Einstein's quip about not needing an ether. Occam was applied just a little *too* sharply. Even Einstein said that answers and solutions ought to be as simple as possible, but... N O T T O O S I M P L E ! Until astrophysicists open their eyes to see space as comprised of a powerful energy that flows into matter and causes gravity, they will continue to be puzzled by most everything they observe in the Universe. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: "You can't have a light without a dark to stick it in." Arlo Guthrie P.P.S.: http://Astronomy.painellsworth.net http://PoisonFalls.painellsworth.net http://TheInternetStory.painellsworth.net |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory
Painius Einstein gave space a concave curve for gravity falling in,and
I added a convex curve for space pushing out. We know two metal plates are pushed together by the energy of space having waves. My theory on gravity compressing space energy and creating the original big bang gave me my E=EMC^2(1946) I have my "Spin is in" theory and photon cloud structure of electrons all coming out at a spacetime of the very first minutes of the big bang. Space energy and gravity are all mother nature needed to create universes. They were intrinsic to the cosmic. They are all there is,and make space so dynamic. The space between the stars holds the universe's biggest mysteries. There can be no TOE unless space is understood. There is no nothing TreBert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ... Painius Einstein gave space a concave curve for gravity falling in,and I added a convex curve for space pushing out. We know two metal plates are pushed together by the energy of space having waves. My theory on gravity compressing space energy and creating the original big bang gave me my E=EMC^2(1946) I have my "Spin is in" theory and photon cloud structure of electrons all coming out at a spacetime of the very first minutes of the big bang. Space energy and gravity are all mother nature needed to create universes. They were intrinsic to the cosmic. They are all there is,and make space so dynamic. The space between the stars holds the universe's biggest mysteries. There can be no TOE unless space is understood. There is no nothing TreBert From your mouth to God's (and Physics') ear, Bert! happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: "You can't have a light without a dark to stick it in." Arlo Guthrie P.P.S.: http://Astronomy.painellsworth.net http://PoisonFalls.painellsworth.net http://TheInternetStory.painellsworth.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Let's discuss big bang theory some more. | Max Keon | Astronomy Misc | 26 | February 20th 09 11:43 AM |
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 14 | February 6th 09 01:23 AM |
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | January 29th 09 12:46 PM |
Lets discuss Big Bang Theory | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 0 | January 7th 09 07:01 PM |
Lets VOTE Einstine Theory. | oldcoot | Misc | 1 | August 14th 08 05:25 AM |