#111
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 3:16*am, Casimiro wrote:
On 16 Nov, 06:20, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 15, 5:19, mpc755 mpc...@ gmail.com ha scritto: On Nov 15, 7:03, Brad Guth bradg...@ gmail.com ha scritto: Mi è stato chiesto; Ritiene etere causare l'atomo di forma e funzione in quanto Fa? Le particelle di materia sono condensazioni di etere. Ora tutto è fatto di etere? E `bipolare etere o semplicemente in grado di multitasking per soddisfare? Da dove e perché è questo etere nostro creatore? Cosa fa il vostro tutto citando hanno a che fare con le mie interazioni su etere? you certainly have studied Maxwell, no? Then a clown, as you think! The translation isn't coming across very good. Sorry about that. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 4:25*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 16, 12:20*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 15, 5:19*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 15, 7:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: I was asking; *Does aether cause the atom to form and function as it does? Particles of matter are condensations of aether. Now everything is made from aether? Is this aether bipolar or simply capable of multitasking to suit? From where and why is this aether our creator? What does your quoting everything have to do with my interactions about aether? 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html "Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field" The electromagnetic field is a state of the aether. Matter is condensations of aether. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEINhttp://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish. However, the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished; it still exists, as aether. Matter evaporates into aether. As matter evaporates into aether it expands into neighboring places; which is energy. Mass is conserved. When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved. If aether is the core foundation or creation of everything, they you must know where this aether originated from or is still emerging from. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/16/2012 11:00 AM, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 16, 10:57 am, wrote: On 11/16/2012 10:21 AM, mpc755 wrote: God believers love ether. Ether allows them to crowbar in almost anything they want. It allows for the correct understanding of what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors of a double slit experiment. Since I have already written you off as a lost cause, please never reply to me ever again. You're a solution in search of a problem. You asked what the Universe is spinning in relation to. The Universe spins in relation to the Universal jet emission point. Why do you ask question when you insist on remaining ignorant of understanding the answer? Because I am pigheaded. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 10:59*am, HVAC wrote:
On 11/16/2012 10:21 AM, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 16, 10:06 am, *wrote: On 11/16/2012 9:16 AM, linuxgal wrote: G=EMC^2 wrote: 11 billion years ago the universe spin started to accelerate. WHY? It knew everything was going to end on Dec 21, 2012 and decided to giddyup. This entire idea of the universe 'spinning' is gay. 'Spinning' in relations to what? The Universal jet emission point. Since there is no external frame of reference, there is no way to determine that the universe is spinning. It is complete and utter foolishness. Not only are you ignorant of the answers to your questions you are ignorant of the experimental evidence which causes you to ask you questions. There is a spin about a preferred axis. This is because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 11:19*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 16, 4:25*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 16, 12:20*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 15, 5:19*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 15, 7:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: I was asking; *Does aether cause the atom to form and function as it does? Particles of matter are condensations of aether. Now everything is made from aether? Is this aether bipolar or simply capable of multitasking to suit? From where and why is this aether our creator? What does your quoting everything have to do with my interactions about aether? 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html "Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field" The electromagnetic field is a state of the aether. Matter is condensations of aether. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEINhttp://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish. However, the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished; it still exists, as aether. Matter evaporates into aether. As matter evaporates into aether it expands into neighboring places; which is energy. Mass is conserved. When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved. If aether is the core foundation or creation of everything, they you must know where this aether originated from or is still emerging from. The Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. You are able to understand 'stuff' is continually being emitted into a black hole polar jet, correct? |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 12:26*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/16/2012 11:00 AM, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 16, 10:57 am, *wrote: On 11/16/2012 10:21 AM, mpc755 wrote: God believers love ether. Ether allows them to crowbar in almost anything they want. It allows for the correct understanding of what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity and the observed behaviors of a double slit experiment. Since I have already written you off as a lost cause, please never reply to me ever again. *You're a solution in search of a problem. You asked what the Universe is spinning in relation to. The Universe spins in relation to the Universal jet emission point. Why do you ask question when you insist on remaining ignorant of understanding the answer? Because I am pigheaded. If you ever want to stop being so ignorant and understand why there is a Universal spin about a preferred axis then understand the following. The Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/16/2012 12:37 PM, mpc755 wrote:
Since there is no external frame of reference, there is no way to determine that the universe is spinning. It is complete and utter foolishness. Not only are you ignorant of the answers to your questions you are ignorant of the experimental evidence which causes you to ask you questions. Good...GOOD! That's it, MP3...Let the hate out. There is a spin about a preferred axis. How can you tell? This is because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. That's just silly. Just like your entire 'ether' belief system. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. The only direction matter is moving in our universe is outward from each and every point, carried by the space/time that encompasses it. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. Hogwash. Give up your belief in ether and god and embrace your new lord...Satan. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 12:49*pm, HVAC wrote:
There is a spin about a preferred axis. How can you tell? Because there is evidence of it. 'Was the universe born spinning?' http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688 "The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis" The Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/16/2012 12:39 PM, mpc755 wrote:
If you ever want to stop being so ignorant and understand why there is a Universal spin about a preferred axis then understand the following. The Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. Ether is gay. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 16, 1:01*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/16/2012 12:39 PM, mpc755 wrote: If you ever want to stop being so ignorant and understand why there is a Universal spin about a preferred axis then understand the following. The Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. Ether is gay. 'Was the universe born spinning?' http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688 "The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis" The Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. There is directionality to the movement of the matter in the Universe which not only can't be explained by the big bang, it refutes the big bang. There is directionality to the motion of the matter in the Universe because the Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs att | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 16th 05 08:54 AM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 15th 05 12:22 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |