|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
US captured V-1 missile tests 1949 - 1951
Rick Jones wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote: The V-2 was the flip side of that...gawdawful expensive to produce, doing a lot less damage from a economic sense per missile launched than the production costs of the missile, and since there was no way to defend against it once launched, not diverting any Allied resources to the defense of its targets. I thought though that capturing V-2 launch sites were a top priority and so diverted offensive attention from other, perhaps more promising areas of the front? Or did I just read too much into the dialog of "Patton?-)" Unlike the V-1, which needed its fixed catapult for launching, the V-2 could be launched from any site within a few hours once it had been surveyed to determine its exact longitude and latitude - as the whole launching infrastructure was road-mobile. So the only way to stop attacks on England by it was to capture all territory that would have allowed it to get in range of its targets (its range was 234 miles). The V-1 sites were a target for allied ground forces to grab in France, but I don't know if the V-2 sites mentioned in the movie were a confusion with those. There's info on the mobile V-2 operations he http://www.v2rocket.com/start/deploy...perations.html And where they were fired from at various cities he http://www.v2rocket.com/start/deploy...ile_front.html Pat Pat |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
US captured V-1 missile tests 1949 - 1951
On Sep 4, 10:27*am, Pat Flannery wrote:
Rick Jones wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: The V-2 was the flip side of that...gawdawful expensive to produce, doing a lot less damage from a economic sense per missile launched than the production costs of the missile, and since there was no way to defend against it once launched, not diverting any Allied resources to the defense of its targets. I thought though that capturing V-2 launch sites were a top priority and so diverted offensive attention from other, perhaps more promising areas of the front? *Or did I just read too much into the dialog of "Patton?-)" Unlike the V-1, which needed its fixed catapult for launching, the V-2 could be launched from any site within a few hours once it had been surveyed to determine its exact longitude and latitude - as the whole launching infrastructure was road-mobile. So the only way to stop attacks on England by it was to capture all territory that would have allowed it to get in range of its targets (its range was 234 miles). The V-1 sites were a target for allied ground forces to grab in France, but I don't know if the V-2 sites mentioned in the movie were a confusion with those. There's info on the mobile V-2 operations hehttp://www.v2rocket.com/start/deploy...perations.html And where they were fired from at various cities hehttp://www.v2rocket..com/start/deplo...ile_front.html Pat Pat Quite a few V-1s were also airlaunched from carrier aircraft. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
US captured V-1 missile tests 1949 - 1951
Dean wrote:
Quite a few V-1s were also airlaunched from carrier aircraft. I've got a 1/48th scale model of one of those by Revell Monogram. It's a He-111 H-22, and is a really nice kit. Accuracy on the air-launched ones was really bad, to the point where the British couldn't figure out what the intended target city was in some cases. The V-1s also sometimes exploded while being carried or at launch, destroying the carrier aircraft. There's footage of one being launched starting at the 1:45 part of this video (the first part is the Hs-293 rocket-boosted glide bomb): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcFmagrdgI4 As you can see, the V-1 oscillates quite a bit after launch as the gyro tries to get it on course and stabilized into level flight. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ÐÂÎÅ:¹Å¶£¨1912-1949£©Ãñ¹ú´É²èºø528°Ñ¡¢´ÉÆ÷400¼þÇë¹ÛÉÍ£¡News,Antique (1912-1949) Porcelain Teapot 528 Chinaware 400,Invitation Visit! | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | November 1st 07 03:03 AM |
¹Å¶£¨1912-1949£©Ãñ‡ø´É²è‰Ø528°Ñ¡¢´ÉÆ÷400¼þ£¬ÑûÕˆÓ^Ùp£¡Antique (1912-1949) Porcelain Teapot 528 Chinaware 400,Invitation Visit ! | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | October 12th 07 06:46 AM |
¹Å¶£¨1912-1949£©Ãñ¹ú´É²èºø528°Ñ¡¢´ÉÆ÷400¼þ£¬ÑûÇë¹ÛÉÍ£¡Antique (1912-1949) Porcelain Teapot 528 Chinaware 400, Invitation Visit! | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | September 24th 07 05:23 AM |
¹Å¶£¨1912-1949£©Ãñ¹ú´É²èºø528°Ñ¡¢´ÉÆ÷400¼þÇë¹ÛÉÍ£¡Antique 1912-1949 Porcelain teapot 528 chinaware 400 invitation visit | xjx588[_3_] | SETI | 0 | September 17th 07 09:11 AM |
¹Å¶£¨1912-1949£©Ãñ¹ú´É²èºø528°Ñ´ÉÆ÷400¼þ£¬ÑûÇë¹ÛÉÍ£¡Antique(1912-1949)Porcelain Teapot528 Chinaware400,invitation visit! | 456 | Misc | 0 | September 17th 07 03:06 AM |