|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MEMS robots and another way to power the world
MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems) uses the technology of
building integrated circuits to build mechanical devices on a tiny scale. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microel...anical_systems This has been used to make tiny robots that can be controlled remotely http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/06/agi...s-smaller.html MEMS based rockets have been built http://www.me.berkeley.edu/mrcl/rockets.html So, tiny flying robots are possible http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=get...er= ADA469488 Since the weight of an object varies as the cube of its dimension, while the surface area of an object varies as the square of its dimension, the thrust to weight ratio of rockets fans props and wings increase dramatically as sizes are reduced. Also, the power to weight ratio of solar powered systems increases as size is reduced as well. Density of silicon: 2.33 grams per cc Power of sunlight: 100 milli-watts per cm2 Cube Area: 6 * d^2 Cube Volume d^3 Sphere Area: pi * d^2 Sphere Volume pi/6 * d^3 So, for a centimeter scale device; Power: 100 milliwatts to 157 milliwatts Weight 2.33 grams to 1.71 grams Power/Weight 50 W/kg to 100 W/kg Which lets us estimate devices of the following sizes 10.00 mm 50 W/kg - 100 W/kg 1.00 mm 500 W/kg - 1,000 W/kg 0.10 mm 5,000 W/kg - 10,000 W/kg 0.01 mm 50,000 W/kg - 100,000 W/kg Nature has a whole range of 'no-see-ems' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairyfly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_dust_mite http://thelongestlistofthelongeststu...mallest49.html What can we do with machines such as these? Well, we can gather sunlight - and since processed silicon costs about $890 per kg - we can see we can make power at $0.01 per peak watt. About 10 grams of silicon devices are needed to power a home, or a hybrid car. 100 grams of silicon devices are enough to power a home and two cars with synthetic fuel made from sunlight and air. We can create a fog where the elements communicate with one another via open optical laser - very similar to the way IR remote controls work - but at a peta-bit rate. This lets us create a global fog that provides a global wireless hotspot without satellites or any large hardware whatever - other than the factory that churns out the solar powered no-see-ums. We can also use them as a means to sense the environment and create a virtual model in any attached computer of the entire world - that can then be interrogated remotely by any authorized user. So, we could create a DVR for the whole world and make it available to anyone or everyone. Small mites could penetrate any storage container and cover every document - scanning it and communicating the information to the fliers - which then communicate it to the virtual reality model - so documents and in fact all records - could be placed in the virtual model A spherical device 0.1 mm in diameter masses 12 nanograms. A fog of 1,000 fliers surrounding every individual on the planet would require 7 billion x 1,000 x 12e-9 grams = 84 kilograms - which costs less than $84,000 - once the core technology is in place. A fog of fliers covering the entire Earth with a 1 cubic centimeter per element - to a depth of 100 meters - would mass 9,600 kg. $9.6 million. Increasing separation to 1 meter reduces this to 9.6 grams - costing $10. Clearly, once the core technology is developed - which can be done for less than $100 million - using an old wafer fab - we could build a power infrastructure and communication infrastructure and an information infrastructure that is tremendously important. Is there any way we can use these no-see-ums for anything else? Consider Newton's third law of motion; mv = MV Imagine a tiny 12 nanogram no-see-um moving at a velocity and hitting a surface. First, the object is likely not to be hurt. Second, the no-see-um will impart a force to the object. A large number of objects will impart a continuous force. F = mdot * velocity 1 newton = mdot * velocity With 100 m/sec velocity then mdot = 1 Newton / 100 = 0.01 10 grams per second - moving at 100 m/sec produces 1 newton of thrust. 800,000 no-see-ums per second at this speed are needed per Newton of thrust. Since the no-see-ums may be recycled - creating a current or flow of particles - the total mass of particles may be quite small. At 100 m/ sec - and moving over say 10 cm - particles may be reused 1,000x per second - so, 800 particles are needed to produce 1 Newton of force. So, to lift requires the following amount of material 1 pound (4.46 Newtons) 3,568 particles 0.05 mg 10 pounds (44.55 Newtons) 35,680 particles 0.5 mg 100 pounds (445.55 Newtons) 356,800 particles 4.4 mg 1,000 pounds (4.5 kN) 3.6 million particles 43.2 mg So, only a few cents of solar powered devices can be organized to lift anything anyone could reasonably deal with even with Earth moving equipment. This can be done in any direction, location, and so forth. Its easy to see that combining the communications, sensing, and virtual model with a force application - would allow people to do useful work anywhere from anywhere. An apple could be identified picked by remote control - and carried to anyone anywhere. People could know what others are doing or have done. People would also have the capability of acting anywhere upon this knowledge. The ability to do good, or not, of all people will be greatly magnified. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MEMS Rocket Fabric Fuel? | David Spain | Policy | 0 | December 17th 09 10:43 PM |
I guess asking for an apology from radical suppression psychos, pigsuckers of Marxes of power in the head is not going to work as George Sorosdiscovered in 2004. Racist world, human crimes, New Direction problem,destroyed economy in a world of racism | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 08 08:30 PM |
MEMs rockets and jets - a fabulous opportunity | Williamknowsbest | Policy | 11 | May 11th 08 04:48 AM |
Answer to a critic's question about MEMs | [email protected] | Policy | 2 | May 11th 08 12:56 AM |
Random thoughts on MEMs based robotics | [email protected] | Policy | 1 | September 17th 07 11:33 AM |