|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:43:04 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:14 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Hagar wrote: *** so, Bast, regale us one more time: In which of the sciences is your college degree??? From the response below it looks as if she's admitting in that Bast sort of way that she didn't go to college at all. I should have thought that even you would eventually realize that a piece of paper does not particularly prove the amount of knowledge a lifetime of experience can offer. Do you feel the same way about your doctor, Bastie? Degrees don't mean anything? How about going over a bridge designed by a pizza delivery girl aka YOU? You want the local Gold Gym rat defending you next time in court? Especially since the paper only proves that back at the time I recieved them, "recieved" Did you even get a GED? LOL What paper which you refer here as "them" are you claiming to have received, Bastie? You however, seem to be just as wet behind the ears as you were back then. Engineering requires mastering a crap load of advanced math. How has math changed in say the past 30 years? .....Apparently you AND Hagar both went to the same spewling polyce skool. How can I ever hope to carry on a DEBATE about science WITH those with your mental acuities. You can't handle it Bastie. Hagar and I *are* both head and shoulders over you. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:27:57 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:34:54 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:31:08 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:45:03 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: Nope. You're never right when you spout your crazy conspiracy stories. Let's leave it with - you can't find the answer to the UK uni. and refuse to address any of my challenges. I accept your capitulation. Spoken like a true SJW libertard feminist !!! After all the things you know about me, Bastie, you have the audacity to accuse me of being a screeching SJW libertard feminist??? AH ...... HAHAHAHAHAHA! Well,... Stop fishing, Bastie. You are doing my job for me. Then your job is making yourself look like a delusional conspiracy nutcase. Glad that's sorted. Don't flatter yourself. You have been making that same unfounded claims for years. It's never unfounded when dealing with you. So I must have put in the effort, You have indeed made yourself look like a delusional conspiracy nutcase. and you are only trying to take the credit, after the fact. I said it was your job. Am I now your boss? Are you now going to tell us that givesyou any credibility at all ? Looks like I own you Bastie. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:43:04 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:57:14 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Hagar wrote: *** so, Bast, regale us one more time: In which of the sciences is your college degree??? From the response below it looks as if she's admitting in that Bast sort of way that she didn't go to college at all. I should have thought that even you would eventually realize that a piece of paper does not particularly prove the amount of knowledge a lifetime of experience can offer. Do you feel the same way about your doctor, Bastie? Degrees don't mean anything? How about going over a bridge designed by a pizza delivery girl aka YOU? You want the local Gold Gym rat defending you next time in court? Especially since the paper only proves that back at the time I recieved them, "recieved" Did you even get a GED? LOL What paper which you refer here as "them" are you claiming to have received, Bastie? You however, seem to be just as wet behind the ears as you were back then. Engineering requires mastering a crap load of advanced math. How has math changed in say the past 30 years? .....Apparently you AND Hagar both went to the same spewling polyce skool. How can I ever hope to carry on a DEBATE about science WITH those with your mental acuities. You can't handle it Bastie. Hagar and I *are* both head and shoulders over you. ROTFFLMAO Thanks for the laugh to start my day. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:27:57 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 01:34:54 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:31:08 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 21:45:03 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: Nope. You're never right when you spout your crazy conspiracy stories. Let's leave it with - you can't find the answer to the UK uni. and refuse to address any of my challenges. I accept your capitulation. Spoken like a true SJW libertard feminist !!! After all the things you know about me, Bastie, you have the audacity to accuse me of being a screeching SJW libertard feminist??? AH ...... HAHAHAHAHAHA! Well,... Stop fishing, Bastie. You are doing my job for me. Then your job is making yourself look like a delusional conspiracy nutcase. Glad that's sorted. Don't flatter yourself. You have been making that same unfounded claims for years. It's never unfounded when dealing with you. So I must have put in the effort, You have indeed made yourself look like a delusional conspiracy nutcase. and you are only trying to take the credit, after the fact. I said it was your job. Am I now your boss? Are you now going to tell us that givesyou any credibility at all ? Looks like I own you Bastie. So you DO finally accept that Apollo was a lie, and that no one went to the moon and returned alive. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. But no actual proof. You can't even provide proof that anyone in the UK was listening for ANY signals. However maybe they were catching an episode of the goon show. Sellers and Mulligan were at their best in the 60's But they were not on the moon either,.....just sent the signal from BBC studios |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. But no actual proof. I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to find it in the thread and read it. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. But no actual proof. I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to find it in the thread and read it. You only provided a vague referrence to something that only you, would consider "proof" You convinnced no one, that Apollo and NASA was/is not a massive money sucking lie. Now my proof again. "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:27:14 -0500, "Bast"
wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. But no actual proof. I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to find it in the thread and read it. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. You only provided a vague referrence to something that only you, would consider "proof" Keep lying, Bastie. These are still in the thread. Message-ID: Message-ID: You convinnced no one, that Apollo and NASA was/is not a massive money sucking lie. I don't need to convince anyone of the truth. There are thousands of verifiable and scientific proof on the web. You're simply to stupid to find them and too dumb to understand what they say. Not my problem. Now my proof again. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Hagar still willingly bending over to let NASA do it to him
Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:27:14 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast" wrote: Sarah Ehrett wrote: So you Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. So your story still goes. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. But no actual proof. I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to find it in the thread and read it. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. You only provided a vague referrence to something that only you, would consider "proof" Keep lying, Bastie. These are still in the thread. Message-ID: Message-ID: You convinnced no one, that Apollo and NASA was/is not a massive money sucking lie. I don't need to convince anyone of the truth. There are thousands of verifiable and scientific proof on the web. You're simply to stupid to find them and too dumb to understand what they say. Not my problem. Now my proof again. Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six missions landed on the moon, Bastie. Ya right,....and it's just as plausible that I went to the planet Mars for my Christmas vacation last year. I say it's true, so no one better contradict me with logical arguments, or I will call them conspiracy theorists. Oh ya,....and I say that the proof is that some UK crackpot with a retrofitted TV dish, monitored all my radio signals, .....so there. PROOF POSITIVE. This year me and my partner are going back there and we will show you some rocks, that we painted red, and so are MARS ROCKS, to prove it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FR Bending of Light -- Proof | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 25th 10 08:14 PM |
FR Bending of Light | philippeb8 | Astronomy Misc | 221 | December 8th 09 06:31 PM |
A question about the bending of light. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 1st 06 11:46 PM |
A question about the bending of light. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 1st 06 04:53 PM |
A question about the bending of light. | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 1st 06 04:53 PM |