|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
STUPID To Crash Cassini Probe
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 14:00:58 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote: Mr. B1ack wrote: On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:25:38 -0400, SteveGG wrote: I couldn't agree more ! The contamination issue would be totally laughable, if it wasn't so sad and ridiculous, but that's the official "reason". What a waste. It could have been parked in a stable orbit and made available for future science, historians, etc. Hey, it's got some memory space onboard ... it could be instructed to save up periodic observations so every once in a while we could download the stash. Doesn't hurt to have an eye way "out there" either in case something interesting happens. How much memory do you think it has on board? How do you think we normally talk to it. It was already extended for NINE YEARS. We could get some useful stuff form it NINTEEN years from now. Why did we waste that opportunity ??? The Voyagers seemed useless relics too ... until we got all interested in the heliopause. Surprise, we had usable spacecraft in the vicinity because nobody'd bothered to crash them into anything. The "contamination" thing is one of the worst excuses I've ever heard. MIGHT, under some circumstances, have some merit for Mars if we were worried about mold spores or whatever, but Saturn ... nah. A nice safe orbit was possible. Not Saturn. The moons. Which we might decide to inhabit some day. In some ways they're better than Mars. You can't just park it and forget about it. How long have those moons been there ? Yes, we could have parked it and pretty much forgotten about it. And if grey aliens kicked it into a moon, so what ? It's a flyspeck. Those moons get bombarded with random galactic crap all the time. I think somebody said "Hey, let's CRASH it into Saturn, that'd be like SO cool !" ... and there went a taxpayer gigabuck. I think you should let someone else do the thinking. That's a preposterous notion. Um ... not so much actually ......... socialize with some tech-nerds for awhile and you'll see :-) Hmm ... Pence is now nominally the top dog of the US space effort so it might not hurt to complain to him about this sort of thing. Policy CAN change. Gigabuck probes should not be considered part of a first-person-shooter game by JPL nerds. If it still mostly works, KEEP it around. Policy CAN change but this one wouldn't have. A number of studies were done to figure out a 'safe' way to dispose of or park the thing. It didn't need to be disposed of AT ALL. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why did NASA intentionally crash the Galileo probe into Jupiter? | Metspitzer | Misc | 1 | December 23rd 13 12:18 AM |
FWD: Crash site of Mars probe 'disappears' | OM | History | 3 | October 23rd 05 02:34 AM |
Genesis probe crash | Jonathan Silverlight | Satellites | 3 | September 9th 04 06:42 AM |
risky path for cassini probe? | simon.coombs3 | UK Astronomy | 13 | July 4th 04 10:38 PM |
Cassini space probe | Lloyd Jones | Misc | 16 | July 2nd 04 02:57 PM |