A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Zombie World of Albert Einstein



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 27th 16, 09:34 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,541
Default The Zombie World of Albert Einstein

https://www.timeshighereducation.com...lli-allen-lane
"If you think that you know what space and time are, be prepared for your intellectual foundations to be vaporised. Carlo Rovelli will melt your synapses with this exploration of physical reality and what the universe is formed of at the very deepest level. His story starts with the ideas of ancient Greeks and accelerates through the Newtonian revolution to the strange worlds of quantum physics and relativity, and their even weirder recent marriage in quantum gravity theory. Reality here is "a world which does not exist in space and does not develop in time"."

Bingo thinks he knows what his real name is but the Clown vaporizes his intellectual foundations:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX5ajyPr96M
Bingo the Clowno

Joe Wolfe's students think they know what speed is but Joe Wolfe vaporizes their intellectual foundations:

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einstein...eird_logic.htm
Joe Wolfe: "At this stage, many of my students say things like "The invariance of the speed of light among observers is impossible" or "I can't understand it". Well, it's not impossible. It's even more than possible, it is true. This is something that has been extensively measured, and many refinements to the Michelson and Morley experiment, and complementary experiments have confirmed this invariance to very great precision. As to understanding it, there isn't really much to understand. However surprising and weird it may be, it is the case. It's the law in our universe. The fact of the invariance of c doesn't take much understanding."

Steve Carlip helps Joe Wolfe in vaporizing students' intellectual foundations: The speed of light is constant by definition. Einstein said the speed of light is variable in a gravitational field - an interpretation which is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense - but after Einstein the speed of light in a gravitational field became constant and is going to remain so forever. So constant that "it does not even make any sense to say that it varies":

http://www.desy.de/user/projects/Phy..._of_light.html
Steve Carlip: "Is c, the speed of light in vacuum, constant? At the 1983 Conference Generale des Poids et Mesures, the following SI (Systeme International) definition of the metre was adopted: The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second. This defines the speed of light in vacuum to be exactly 299,792,458 m/s. This provides a very short answer to the question "Is c constant": Yes, c is constant by definition! [...] Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: "...according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [...] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position." Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity suggests that he did mean so. This interpretation is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense, but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity. [...] Finally, we come to the conclusion that the speed of light is not only observed to be constant; in the light of well tested theories of physics, it does not even make any sense to say that it varies."

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old October 27th 16, 10:28 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,541
Default The Zombie World of Albert Einstein

Einsteinians know no limits:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-in-spacetime/
"The notion that spacetime has bits or is "made up" of anything is a departure from the traditional picture according to general relativity. According to the new view, spacetime, rather than being fundamental, might "emerge" via the interactions of such bits. What, exactly, are these bits made of and what kind of information do they contain? Scientists do not know. Yet intriguingly, "what matters are the relationships" between the bits more than the bits themselves..."

Other Einsteinians reject Einstein's spacetime but "don't know what it's replaced by":

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26563
Nobel Laureate David Gross observed, "Everyone in string theory is convinced...that spacetime is doomed. But we don't know what it's replaced by."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U47kyV4TMnE
Nima Arkani-Hamed (06:09): "Almost all of us believe that space-time doesn't really exist, space-time is doomed and has to be replaced by some more primitive building blocks."

http://www.thebatt.com/science-techn...3aa345281.html
"Arkani-Hamed said."Because of the existence of gravity and quantum mechanics, we believe that the concept of spacetime is doomed and there are many simple thought experiments that tell us that space time is doomed."

https://edge.org/response-detail/25477
What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime... [...] The apparent need to retire classical spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...spacetime.html
"Rethinking Einstein: The end of space-time [...] The stumbling block lies with their conflicting views of space and time. As seen by quantum theory, space and time are a static backdrop against which particles move. In Einstein's theories, by contrast, not only are space and time inextricably linked, but the resulting space-time is moulded by the bodies within it. [...] Something has to give in this tussle between general relativity and quantum mechanics, and the smart money says that it's relativity that will be the loser."

A typical physics student (Bingo the Einsteiniano):

http://www.infonetworkmarketing.org/...anza-paure.jpg

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CLAUSIUS ZOMBIE WORLD IS MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 4 September 12th 08 02:51 PM
INTROSPECTION IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 October 23rd 07 07:04 AM
NEW AETHER IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 October 12th 07 10:03 AM
Albert Einstein, the Rational World and the Zombie World brian a m stuckless Policy 0 October 25th 05 09:48 PM
Albert Einstein, the Rational World and the Zombie World brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 October 25th 05 09:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.