A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jupiter is a pulsar (2002 proof) and caused by EM-gravity on itspoles Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1484 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th 13, 06:15 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Jupiter is a pulsar (2002 proof) and caused by EM-gravity on itspoles Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1484 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed


Today must be a lucky day for me, for now we have Jupiter a pulsar
within the Solar System.

-- quoting from
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...jupiterpuzzle/

"The pulses are coming from the north pole of Jupiter," says Randy
Gladstone, a scientist at the Southwest Research Institute and leader
of the team that made the discovery using NASA's orbiting Chandra X-
ray Observatory.
Above: Every 45 minutes an x-ray source blinks near Jupiter's north
magnetic pole. This animation, based on data from the Chandra X-ray
Observatory, shows the hot spot pulsing 15 times during one complete
10-hour rotation of the giant planet.
-- end quote --

Now the 5th edition of this book is going to simplify the 4th edition
very much so, and by that I mean odd exotica in astronomy of pulsars,
neutron stars, black-holes, and quasars are easily dismissed in this
5th edition as nothing more elaborate than the Maxwell Equations
yielding X-rays from the Maxwell Equations.

So, what I have is that quasars are just normal galaxies nearby to the
Milky Way with their galactic nucleus of EM-gravity in gravity-cells
of large stars emitting gamma rays and X-rays. Pulsars are binary
stars with gravity-cells clashing to produce pulsed signals. The Sun
and Jupiter are two gravity cells clashing and producing Jupiter's
pulses as noted above. Stars as neutron stars are nonexistent and they
are simply normal stars or large planets of a binary pair in which
their gravity cells are clashing and emitting X-rays and gamma rays.
Black holes are nonexistent and simply are two gravity cells of large
binary stars clashing.

So in a Universe where physics is axiomatized by the Maxwell
Equations, gravity is EM-gravity and when two large bodies form
gravity cells that clash, they form a X-ray tube. See how the Maxwell
Equations derives the X-ray tube as a source of X-rays and gamma rays.

Now I see this discovery of Jupiter was made in 2002 yet this is 2013
and there should have been a huge important news broadcast of this
important fact. However it was squashed and suppressed in the news. I
just found out of this news last night. And the reason it was
suppressed is because it goes against the mainstream muddle headed and
wrong scientists who want to keep their fantasy of black-holes,
quasars, neutron stars and pulsars, keep that fictional fantasy going
on longer, when it should have been swept out of physics in shame by
2002.

--

Science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, 
sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag need to
be hosted the same as what Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. The world has plenty of
good colleges and Universities to
host each of the science newsgroups.
Divide them up and spread them
out. Science belongs in education, not
in private companies trying to make more money. People
reading science
do not need silly ads continually distracting and
nagging them. Google
and Bing are ill suited to host science 
newsgroups, not just
advertisement, but Â*because of three major
flaws: (1) search engine
bombing (2) fake names allowed (3) no limit of posts per day. When you
have those three evils, the signal to noise ratio is off the charts.
In the old days, before May 2012 where Google
had author-search, you
could follow an author. Now that Google no
longer keeps an author
archive the newsgroups are nothing more than 
chat rooms. Google,
metaphorically used to be the PBS of Usenet and now they want to
become the mind-rot of CBS, NBC, ABC for Usenet.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen he

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Binary stars prove that Gravity-cells exist Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1481 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 9th 13 09:23 PM
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modern dayAntikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 2 April 6th 13 07:10 AM
may have found a mechanism for Pulsar stars Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1472 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 April 6th 13 03:30 AM
Table of Resonances Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1455 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 3rd 13 08:10 PM
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 March 31st 13 08:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.