Dark Energy really is an Energy, not a different behaviour of Gravity

On May 22, 1:25*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On May 20, 4:56 pm, "hanson" wrote:

Professor Pante wrote:

I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
is really really bad.
He had no clue, and died without one.
That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.

Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:

** * * * *FAITH IS THEORY
** * * * *LYING IS TEACHING
** * * * NITWIT IS GENIUS
** * * * OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** * * *PARADOX IS KOSHER
** * * *FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** * * BULL**** IS TRUTH
** * *BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** * *MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** * *IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** * CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** * PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** *MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS

Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
is positive, gravitational force is attractive. *The reverse, although
never been observed, must be true. *That is if the gravitating mass is
negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
shrug

Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
In free space, this mass density is zero. *However, it does not take a
genius to figure out if the mass density is negative, gravitational
effect becomes repulsive. *Poisson was the very first person to
suggest antigravity but knew better not to. *Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this
nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
shrug

Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. *What the ****
does negative mass mean? *The only plausible answer is ignorance.
After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god. *Anything this nitwit, the
plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
these self-styled physicists. *That is called Dingleberry
worshipping. *shrug

Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
exponentially amplifies. *The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
Hilbert not Schwarzschild. *Both metrics are mathematically legal
solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. *Schwarzschild’s original solution
does not allow for the existence of black holes. *Let’s look at the
Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
gravity. *There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
this discussion, they are ignored.

** *ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 – dr^2 / (1 + K / r) – r^2 dO^2

Where

** *K = One of the many integration constants
** *dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
gravitation to antigravity. *There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
point this particular integration constant as the following besides
through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always
20/20. *shrug

** *K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement

This point collaborates with Professor Ponte’s astute observation of
how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned.
shrug

lost in mathland

On May 22, 2:42*am, john wrote:
On May 22, 1:25*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:





On May 20, 4:56 pm, "hanson" wrote:

Professor Pante wrote:

I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
is really really bad.
He had no clue, and died without one.
That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.

Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:

** * * * *FAITH IS THEORY
** * * * *LYING IS TEACHING
** * * * NITWIT IS GENIUS
** * * * OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** * * *PARADOX IS KOSHER
** * * *FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** * * BULL**** IS TRUTH
** * *BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** * *MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** * *IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** * CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** * PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** *MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS

Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
is positive, gravitational force is attractive. *The reverse, although
never been observed, must be true. *That is if the gravitating mass is
negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
shrug

Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
In free space, this mass density is zero. *However, it does not take a
genius to figure out if the mass density is negative, gravitational
effect becomes repulsive. *Poisson was the very first person to
suggest antigravity but knew better not to. *Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this
nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
shrug

Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. *What the ****
does negative mass mean? *The only plausible answer is ignorance.
After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god. *Anything this nitwit, the
plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
these self-styled physicists. *That is called Dingleberry
worshipping. *shrug

Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
exponentially amplifies. *The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
Hilbert not Schwarzschild. *Both metrics are mathematically legal
solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. *Schwarzschild’s original solution
does not allow for the existence of black holes. *Let’s look at the
Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
gravity. *There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
this discussion, they are ignored.

** *ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 – dr^2 / (1 + K / r) – r^2 dO^2

Where

** *K = One of the many integration constants
** *dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
gravitation to antigravity. *There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
point this particular integration constant as the following besides
through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always
20/20. *shrug

** *K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement

This point collaborates with Professor Ponte’s astute observation of
how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned.
shrug

lost in mathland- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

For every pound of nonsense in your brain your soul has to travel an
extra 6.8 light years when you die.

"Don Stockbauer" wrote:
-- john wrote:
--- Koobee Wublee wrote:
---- Jan Panteltje wrote:
----- "hanson" wrote:



hanson wrote:
Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he
folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked
the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,....
Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso:

|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
|||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
|||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
|||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous
|||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire
|||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included."
|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)]
http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein

So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy
career-journey which concludes, long last, with what
most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time,
if not outright from the start, that:
====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ======
===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ====

Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after
he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then
noble political agenda. (2)
http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1)
http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1)
http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1)
http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2)
http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2)

GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being
"a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries
to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said
not to do that.

Professor Panteltje wrote:
I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
is really really bad.
He had no clue, and died without one.
That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.

KW wrote:
Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:

** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS

Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although
never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is
negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
shrug

Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero.

hanson wrote:
Revisiting an earlier discussion:
http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question
Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years
before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2.
Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe
Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession
and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2.
http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein
http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2
http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft

Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists,
current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's
sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years,
experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be:
G = H^2/rho
wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the
mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some
small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can
be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic
envelope as
c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4
IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has
any use in the here and real universe that we
live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment

KW continued & wrote:
However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the
mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes
repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest
antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this
nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
shrug

Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the ****
does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance.
After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the
plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry
worshipping. shrug

Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal
solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild’s original solution
does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let’s look at the
Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
this discussion, they are ignored.

** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 – dr^2 / (1 + K / r) – r^2 dO^2
Where
** K = One of the many integration constants
** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
point this particular integration constant as the following besides
through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always
20/20. shrug

** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement

This point collaborates with Professor Ponte’s astute observation of
how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned.
shrug

John, the vegan admitted & wrote:
John is lost in mathland & Hid quoted text then Showed quoted text -

Don KalterBauer wrote:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kalter_Bauer
For every pound of nonsense in your brain your soul has
to travel an extra 6.8 light years when you die

hanson wrote:
Luckily in your case, Kalter Bauer, you won't have
to travel nor die. You speak nonsense here and now.
What happened to you?
You seemed to be rational in the past when you...

Don Stockbauer wrote:
||| Don said: I actually think that you're discussing an
||| Don said: important topic. We are better than Einstein.
||| Don said: That Einstein. I can't stand the guy, OOOHHHH,
||| Don said: he makes me want to chew the bark off a tree.
||| Don said: I hate him. Einstein has trouble standing up
||| Don said: against the intellect of the current Global Brain.
||| Don said: Einstein is no match for the Global Brain, thus
||| Don said: he is ridiculed today. Einstein should be shot.