|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Einsteinians Confuse the World
http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ods/index.html
John Norton: "If we are to retain both of Einstein's postulates, we will have to make systematic changes throughout our physics. Let us begin investigating these changes. They will overturn our classical presumptions about space and time. The first change we will investigate has to do with time. An inertially moving clock runs more slowly than one at rest." The conclusion "An inertially moving clock runs more slowly than one at rest" does not follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates. What follows is: (A) An inertially moving clock runs more slowly than one at rest, as judged from the system at rest. (B) An inertially moving clock runs faster than one at rest, as judged from the moving system. The combination of (A) and (B), a deductive consequence of Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate, makes the famous time travel into the future impossible and converts Einstein's special relativity into an absurdity. Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How Einsteinians Confuse the World
http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teachi...ved/index.html
John Norton: "Every sound or light wave has a particular frequency and wavelength. In sound, they determine the pitch; in light they determine the color. Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to have increased (and correspondingly for the wavelength - the distance between crests - to have decreased)." The "observer" can be just a clock that registers the time of arrival of wavecrests. It can neither change nor measure the wavelength of the incoming light: http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ler_static.gif (stationary observer) http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif (moving observer) John Norton is forced to lie blatantly here because, since the motion of the observer can by no means change the wavelength of the incoming light, it is the speed of the light relative to the observer that increases and causes the frequency shift, in violation of Einstein's relativity. Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How Einsteinians Confuse the World
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._of_light.html
"To state that the speed of light is independent of the velocity of the observer is very counterintuitive. Some people even refuse to accept this as a logically consistent possibility, but in 1905 Einstein was able to show that it is perfectly consistent if you are prepared to give up assumptions about the absolute nature of space and time." To state that two and two make five is very counterintuitive. Some people even refuse to accept this as a logically consistent possibility, but in 1984 Big Brother was able to show that it is perfectly consistent if you are prepared to give up rationality. http://i1297.photobucket.com/albums/...s50f1e6f8..png http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvlrwnJIUAAe5Z2.jpg Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quantum micro world vs Classical macro world | G=EMC^2TreBert | Misc | 1 | January 30th 15 10:24 PM |
HOW EINSTEINIANS CAN LEAVE THEIR SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | July 22nd 09 09:56 AM |
WHERE ARE THE EINSTEINIANS? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 28 | November 16th 08 03:52 AM |
She'd send secondly than confuse with Greg's provincial figure. | Atiqullah Said al-Islamia | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 13th 07 10:17 AM |
Does your Newtonian confuse you? | Rich | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 22nd 05 01:57 AM |