A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

EINSTEIN'S FUNDAMENTAL LIE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 8th 15, 11:15 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default EINSTEIN'S FUNDAMENTAL LIE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKKbkS_LOu4
2:27 : "Einstein showed that the faster one travels, the slower time goes for the traveler."

This does not follow from Einstein's 1905 postulates. The valid conclusion from the postulates is:

The faster one travels, the FASTER time goes for the traveler (he sees his clock running faster than stationary clocks):

http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf
Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, David Morin, Cambridge University Press, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. (...) For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow..."

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old September 9th 15, 08:12 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default EINSTEIN'S FUNDAMENTAL LIE

The original version of Einstein's fundamental lie:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES, A. Einstein, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B."

http://blog.hasslberger.com/Dingle_S...Crossroads.pdf
SCIENCE AT THE CROSSROADS, Herbert Dingle, p.27: "According to the special relativity theory, as expounded by Einstein in his original paper, two similar, regularly-running clocks, A and B, in uniform relative motion, must work at different rates. (...) How is the slower-working clock distinguished?"

Dingle's question is rhetorical - the slower-working clock cannot be distinguished on the basis of Einstein's 1905 postulates alone. The postulates entail that:

(A) for an observer in the moving clock's system, the stationary clock at B lags behind the moving clock;

(B) for a stationary observer, the moving clock lags behind the stationary clock at B.

Clearly there is a contradiction which means that an underlying premise, Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate, is false.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THE FUNDAMENTAL DILEMMA IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 June 4th 14 08:46 PM
Fundamental Questions Elassoto Research 0 August 27th 13 01:36 PM
FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF COSMOLOGY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 10 September 17th 08 06:10 PM
CLAUSIUS ZOMBIE WORLD IS MORE FUNDAMENTAL THAN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 4 September 12th 08 02:51 PM
A fundamental Question Researcher Astronomy Misc 17 October 17th 06 04:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.