|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Jupiter's pulsar period compared to pulsar stars Chapt16.15 GravityCells #1487 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Sorry I forget to include "hard" in the X-ray of previous posts, for
the scientists found Jupiter's X-rays as soft -- less energy than 1keV. I changed that error on the original with a (sic) sign. --- quoting --- http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...jupiterpuzzle/ "The 45-minute pulsations are very mysterious," adds Elsner. They're not perfectly regular like a signal from E.T. might be; the period drifts back and forth by a few percent. "This is a natural process," he adds, "we just don't know what it is...." --- end quote --- But let me see if any pulsars come anywhere close to a 45 minute pulse. According to Wikipedia on pulsars, the longest period is that of 9.437 seconds. The shortest so far are millisecond. But here is where the idea that pulsars are the clashing together of gravity cells of binary stars is superior, in that the shortest period does not depend on physical entity rotation but rather the rotation of Faraday lines of force of magnetic monopoles. In Old Physics, they had you believe a actual physical star is spinning in milliseconds, but in New Physics we have no millisecond spinning but rather we have Faraday lines of force interacting with other Faraday lines of force. Now 9.4 seconds is far away from 45 minutes pulse period, but Jupiter is a planet around the Sun whereas all those pulsars are binary stars. Now I do not know if the South Pole of Jupiter also has these soft X- rays and whether only the North Pole. If we consider the Wimshurst generator as model of Jupiter pulses where the pulse is the discharge of the capacitors across the electrode, then we should never expect the discharge to be at two places but only one place. Now as for the 15 pulses per 1 complete Jupiter rotation on axis, I am concerned the number 15 is more connected with the orbital speed of Jupiter of its 13 km/sec compared to the Sun's 220km/sec, because if we take 13 x 15 we end up with 195, but Jupiter in its fastest speed around the Sun is 14.5 where 14.5 x 15 is 217 km/sec and close to that of 220km/ sec of the Sun. So I think the orbit of Jupiter is more related to this 45 minute pulses than is the Jupiter rotation. As for binary stars that are pulsars, the pulses do not come from the rotation or spinning of the stars but rather the gravity cells interacting and following Faraday's lines of force and Faraday's law to create a X-ray tube of the star and to create pulses. -- Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
deriving Jupiter's 15 pulsar pulses per 10 hours Chapt16.15 GravityCells #1485 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 10th 13 10:55 PM |
Jupiter is a pulsar (2002 proof) and caused by EM-gravity on itspoles Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1484 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 10th 13 06:15 PM |
solving Retrograde motion of our Solar System Chapt16.15 GravityCells #1475 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 7th 13 06:47 AM |
may have found a mechanism for Pulsar stars Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1472 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 6th 13 03:30 AM |
no Gamma Ray Pulsar; no Laser Pulsar are tentative proof of the FusionBarrier Principle | a_plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 17th 06 06:48 AM |