|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Binary stars prove that Gravity-cells exist Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1481 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Now I thought perhaps I could validate the Titius Bode Rule as a form
of the Balmer Rydberg spectral lines of physics not only by the planets around the Sun, but by binary stars. Trouble is that binary stars revolve around a center of mass, and not like our planets around the center of the Sun. But I still maybe able to show that binary stars show a doubling effect in distance the same way that the Titius Bode Rule is a doubling in distance for the planets. So far, I have not spied a data filled report on binaries with a doubling in distance orbits. But I will keep looking. But what I did discover, is that Binary Stars are a supportive truth that Gravity Cells exist. Now some would and could be skeptical that Mercury with its 47km/sec speed whilst the Sun is 220km/sec speed would have the Sun flying away from Mercury and have Mercury end up in the Kuiper belt some 10 years hence, if not for the Sun's gravity cell. Neither Newtonian gravity nor General Relativity can explain how Mercury going at 47km/sec can be bound to the Sun going at 220km/sec. If Mercury was going 267km/sec, then Newtonian gravity and General Relativity would be acceptable. But that is not the case. So what keeps Mercury bound to the Sun, is that the Sun has a gravity cell of the Maxwell Equations. A gravity cell is space itself and is composed of magnetic monopoles. The Sun bends Space around it, and bends it so much that it is a sphere shape stretching out to the Oort Cloud, and in this manner, you can have Mercury going at 47 km/sec while the Sun is going 220km/sec, because the gravity cell is itself rotating about an axis. This rotation compensates for the speed of Mercury so that it would be 267km/sec. But I explained all of this in prior posts. What is different here, today, is that Binary Stars need that same explanation of a Gravity Cell in order to even have a concept of "Center of Mass" for binaries because that center-of-mass is just empty space. So when Stars become binary stars, the Gravity Cell is not the center of one star and the center of the second star, but the gravity cell has its own center in empty space. So without Gravity Cells in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, we would not have Mercury bound to the Sun but be abandoned by the Sun flying away at 220km/sec, and we would not have the existence of Binary Stars, because a center of mass has to be a gravity-cell. So binary stars prove that Gravity-Cells exist. Now I will still hunt to see if binary star orbits are quantized into a doubling of distance. -- Science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag need to be hosted the same as what Drexel University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. The world has plenty of good colleges and Universities to host each of the science newsgroups. Divide them up and spread them out. Science belongs in education, not in private companies trying to make more money. People reading science do not need silly ads continually distracting them. Google and Bing are ill suited to host science newsgroups, not just advertisement, but because of three major flaws: (1) search engine bombing (2) fake names allowed (3) no limit of posts per day. When you have those three evils, the signal to noise ratio is off the charts. In the old days, before May 2012 where Google had author-search, Google was good, but now that Google does not even have author archive search, Google is no better than a crude chat room. Now Drexel's Math Forum allows fake names and no limit of posts per day, but should they adopt those two rules, their Math Forum could rival and out-best a peer reviewed journal of mathematics, both in truth and diversity of ideas. Most would say that peer reviewed journals are the best forum for any science, but that is not true since peer reviewed journals are filled with Doppler redshift, Big Bang and black holes and when found wrong, means those journals were nearly 100% wrong in all they had published. If peer reviewed journals had been around in medicine, they would have had you believe that leeches and blood-letting were cures for ailments. Science routinely goes around throwing out onto the trash pile the peer reviewed science of past by gone eras. The flaw of peer reviewed is that it is too closed and not open, too much clubhouse, and stifles the new and true. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- 
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen 
he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds Binary stars prove thatGravity-cells exist Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1482 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
On Apr 9, 2:52Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote: Now I thought perhaps I could validate the Titius Bode Rule as a form of the Balmer Rydberg spectral lines of physics not only by the planets around the Sun, but by binary stars. Trouble is that binary stars revolve around a center of mass, and not like our planets around the center of the Sun. But I still maybe able to show that binary stars show a doubling effect in distance the same way that the Titius Bode Rule is a doubling in distance for the planets. So far, I have not spied a data filled report on binaries with a doubling in distance orbits. But I will keep looking. But what I did discover, is that Binary Stars are a supportive truth that Gravity Cells exist. Now some would and could be skeptical that Mercury with its 47km/sec speed whilst the Sun is 220km/sec speed would have the Sun flying away from Mercury and have Mercury end up in the Kuiper belt some 10 years hence, if not for the Sun's gravity cell. Neither Newtonian gravity nor General Relativity can explain how Mercury going at 47km/sec can be bound to the Sun going at 220km/sec. If Mercury was going 267km/sec, then Newtonian gravity and General Relativity would be acceptable. But that is not the case. So what keeps Mercury bound to the Sun, is that the Sun has a gravity cell of the Maxwell Equations. A gravity cell is space itself and is composed of magnetic monopoles. The Sun bends Space around it, and bends it so much that it is a sphere shape stretching out to the Oort Cloud, and in this manner, you can have Mercury going at 47 km/sec while the Sun is going 220km/sec, because the gravity cell is itself rotating about an axis. This rotation compensates for the speed of Mercury so that it would be 267km/sec. But I explained all of this in prior posts. What is different here, today, is that Binary Stars need that same explanation of a Gravity Cell in order to even have a concept of "Center of Mass" for binaries because that center-of-mass is just empty space. So when Stars become binary stars, the Gravity Cell is not the center of one star and the center of the second star, but the gravity cell has its own center in empty space. So without Gravity Cells in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, we would not have Mercury bound to the Sun but be abandoned by the Sun flying away at 220km/sec, and we would not have the existence of Binary Stars, because a center of mass has to be a gravity-cell. So binary stars prove that Gravity-Cells exist. Now I will still hunt to see if binary star orbits are quantized into a doubling of distance. -- Science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag need to be hosted the same as what Drexel University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. The world has plenty of good colleges and Universities to host each of the science newsgroups. Divide them up and spread them out. Science belongs in education, not in private companies trying to make more money. People reading science do not need silly ads continually distracting them. Google and Bing are ill suited to host science newsgroups, not just advertisement, but Â*because of three major flaws: (1) search engine bombing (2) fake names allowed (3) no limit of posts per day. When you have those three evils, the signal to noise ratio is off the charts. In the old days, before May 2012 where Google had author-search, Google was good, but now that Google does not even have author archive search, Google is no better than a crude chat room. Now Drexel's Math Forum allows fake names and no limit of posts per day, but should they adopt those two rules, their Math Forum could rival and out-best a peer reviewed journal of mathematics, both in truth and diversity of ideas. Most would say that peer reviewed journals are the best forum for any science, but that is not true since peer reviewed journals are filled with Doppler redshift, Big Bang and black holes and when found wrong, means those journals were nearly 100% wrong in all they had published. If peer reviewed journals had been around in medicine, they would have had you believe that leeches and blood-letting were cures for ailments. Science routinely goes around throwing out onto the trash pile the peer reviewed science of past by gone eras. The flaw of peer reviewed is that it is too closed and not open, too much clubhouse, and stifles the new and true. Alright, good, for I am going to have a tremendous reduction on the topic of Tifft quantized galaxy speeds and the topic of Galactic Mapping as by Jarrett and Juric of the 4th edition of this book. In the 4th edition I had many posts of Tifft quantized galaxy speeds and Jarrett and Juric maps of the galaxies. You see, when Doppler redshift is no longer true physics because it violates Special Relativity, then the Doppler Redshift is caused by diffraction or refraction of light as it travels in curved and bent space. Now Hubble discovered redshift but he himself came to despise the redshift as a distance measure. The redshift measures only the degree of bending Space. So that when Tifft was looking for a quantization of Doppler Redshift, he truly did find a quantization because along any smooth surface that is uniformly bent, you will find lines of curvature which has galaxies and which would register the same redshift because they lie on that same curvature. But what is more important is the quantization of orbits of planets, stars and even galaxies. With gravity being EM-gravity, we have quantization of distances that planets orbit stars and distances that stars orbit other stars. We have quantization of distances that galaxies are separated from other galaxies. So in this edition, the 5th edition, I need no longer dwell on Tifft because Doppler Redshift was never true physics anyway. And as for galaxy mapping of Jarrett and Juric, theirs is all based on Doppler Redshift and thus all is rotten and almost worthless to consider in science. When the Maxwell Equations are the axioms over all of physics and gravity is EM-gravity, then redshift is a curvature indicator, not a distance measure. And so the Galactic Mapping in EM-gravity is more like that of a patterned orderly map resembling Spectral Lines in physics where galaxies are spaced almost like fruit tree orchards. -- Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- 
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen he http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solar gravity cell spins at 72.5 days for 1 revolution; Modern dayAntikythera Mechanism Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1473 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 6th 13 07:10 AM |
may have found a mechanism for Pulsar stars Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1472 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 6th 13 03:30 AM |
110 days for a complete Solar gravity cell rotation Chapt16.15Gravity Cells #1469 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 5th 13 06:08 PM |
Table of Resonances Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1455 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 3rd 13 08:10 PM |
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 31st 13 08:19 AM |