|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Largest APO built in the last ~10 years?
John Steinberg wrote: What are the current *practical* limits on size of an APO refractor? I don't think the necessary material is available in blanks much larger than about 14". Assuming you use a 1/3 diameter sub-aperture corrector to achieve apochromatism, then it should be possible to achieve a 40-45" diameter apochromat. Of course, you could always create a very large glass blank by cementing together polygonal "puzzle pieces". I know this was done back in the 1960's to create calcium fluoride lenses larger than the available raw material would allow. Using the latter technique should allow you to make a truly monumental APO refractor, assuming that thermal expansion wouldn't cause cracking in ordinary use. I think if the survival of the species depended on it we could make an apochromat considerably larger than 100" in diameter. Brian www.caldwellphotographic.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What are the current *practical* limits on size of an APO refractor?
Pocketbook. ;-) Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ Are you interested in understanding optics? Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ATM_Optics_Software/ ************************************ -- -John Steinberg email: lid |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What are the current *practical* limits on size of an APO refractor?
Obviously availibility of glass is the big problem, but even if glass becomes available, as the size is increased, so does the deflection of the glass under its own weight, this will definitely set a limit for the size of very large apo. Another problem is the color correction, as the aperture is increased so does the chromatic aberration, for instance if a given formula results in an acceptable color correction for a 6" F/8, a much larger apo based on a similar design may have to go up to F/12 to f/15 to allow for the same color correction, resulting in a huge & massive instrument. As the size is increased negatives pile up big time making very large apo's not cost effective and or practical. My guess is that 12" is the practical limit for the super size apo with fluorite element. Thanks, Vahe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
vahe240d wrote: My guess is that 12" is the practical limit for the super size apo with fluorite element. Actually, modelling after James Baker's suggestion, I found you might be able to cheat a bit on that, e.g.: http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/baker2-75z.len http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/baker2-75z.txt Thanks, Vahe |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Actually, modelling after James Baker's suggestion, I found you might
be able to cheat a bit on that, e.g.: Cheating no doubt will result in considerably larger apo, as long as the design remains on paper or on the computer screen everything should appear just fine. But try to build that, you now face tons of practical problems that are non issue during the design. When you face these practical problems the real fun begins, and cheating will not save the day. Thanks, Vahe |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
John Steinberg wrote: How big and what are the specs? Where is it located? Who built it? What are the current *practical* limits on size of an APO refractor? Believe Markus Ludes of APM has commissioned a 21 inch APO from LZOS for his own personal use. This may be the largest APO on the planet. Believe there are also a couple 14 inch APOs out there that were also built by LZOS. Cheers, Tom Mack |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:33:47 +0000, "Richard F.L.R. Snashall"
wrote: vahe240d wrote: My guess is that 12" is the practical limit for the super size apo with fluorite element. Actually, modelling after James Baker's suggestion, I found you might be able to cheat a bit on that, e.g.: http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/baker2-75z.len http://users.rcn.com/rflrs/baker2-75z.txt It's good that this is all speculation. Because if anyone were going to spend the kind of money that would take, they could invest in any kind of reflector, get a better instrument for what, about 1/5th the cost? And the mirror could be larger too. -Rich |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
RichA wrote: It's good that this is all speculation. Because if anyone were going to spend the kind of money that would take, they could invest in any kind of reflector, get a better instrument for what, about 1/5th the cost? And the mirror could be larger too. Let me guess... you like reflectors over refractors? -Rich |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
knowledge is power | mostafa dia | Satellites | 3 | August 11th 04 07:17 AM |
knowledge is power | mostafa dia | SETI | 4 | August 7th 04 02:24 PM |
knowledge is power | mostafa dia | FITS | 0 | August 7th 04 02:37 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
The largest telescopes in the world | Paul Schlyter | Amateur Astronomy | 82 | October 11th 03 08:19 AM |