A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 10th 19, 02:02 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo

One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and
judge for yourselves.



  #2  
Old June 10th 19, 03:11 AM posted to alt.astronomy
palsing[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,068
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo

On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and
judge for yourselves.


You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's Bible Blessings" too?

Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours...

http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon

"Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade."

You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you are proud of it!
  #3  
Old June 10th 19, 04:24 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo



palsing wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it
and judge for yourselves.


You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a
conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's
Bible Blessings" too?

Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours...

http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon

"Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny
Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo,
strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature
conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in
the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually
filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was
not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are
immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history
and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command
Module or accurate mockup," says McDade."

You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you
are proud of it!








giggle Wikipedia ?
Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake
news is so much funnier.
You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy,
fiction stories.

Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The
Moon "
And you can view it here,...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4



  #4  
Old June 10th 19, 07:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo

"Bast" wrote in message ...

One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and
judge for yourselves.


*** OK, one more time, you demented chromosome challenged weirdo: Radio
signals are directional. Pilots use the directional beacon of a radio
station near the airport at which they want to land and it displays the
direction, in degrees, on the screen of the direction finder.
Now the Russians would have loved nothing more than to expose the "hoax",
however, when they monitored the transmissions between the astronauts and
Ground control, they discovered that they beacon came from the same spot on
the Moon for the duration of each Moon landing. Not from the orbiter, where
the signal direction constantly moved and even disappeared when the orbiter
went to the "Dark Side". The beacons are so accurate, that the Russkies
could even determine the exact location of each landing.

Secondly, on one of the landings the astronauts placed a reflector plate to
bounce back radar signals sent from Earth. The transit times of the radar
signals were measured and gave scientists the exact distance of the Moon
from Earth, which allowed them to calculate the rate of recession, which is
about 1.5 inches per year. The reflector plate took quite some time to
adjust for maximum effectiveness and that could have only been done by
manual finetuning made by astronauts on the Moon.

So please, Bast, spare us any more of your ridiculous drivel about the "Moon
Landing Hoax" ... you are not well.

  #5  
Old June 10th 19, 08:11 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo

On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it
and judge for yourselves.


You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a
conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's
Bible Blessings" too?

Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours...

http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon

"Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny
Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo,
strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature
conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in
the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually
filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was
not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are
immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history
and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command
Module or accurate mockup," says McDade."

You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you
are proud of it!








giggle Wikipedia ?
Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake
news is so much funnier.
You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy,
fiction stories.

Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The
Moon "
And you can view it here,...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4


I watch all launching first hand.They were 100% true.Than GOPer Mafia killed JFK and we got 43 years of stuttles thanks to Nixon Annenberg and Kissinger.During those 43 years Walter Annenberg stole 2 billion each year.86 billion WOW so sad o true.Bert
  #6  
Old June 10th 19, 08:22 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo



Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it
and judge for yourselves.

You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a
conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's
Bible Blessings" too?

Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours...

http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon

"Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny
Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods,
innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and
premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and
weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were
actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that
Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things
that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read
Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside
an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade."

You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you
are proud of it!








giggle Wikipedia ?
Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your
source,.....their fake news is so much funnier.
You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy,
fiction stories.

Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To
The Moon "
And you can view it here,...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4


I watch all launching first hand.They were 100% true.Than GOPer Mafia
killed JFK and we got 43 years of stuttles thanks to Nixon Annenberg
and Kissinger.During those 43 years Walter Annenberg stole 2 billion
each year.86 billion WOW so sad o true.Bert






No one is ever claiming there were no Apollo rocket launches.
But you would know that if you took the time to watch ANY of the videos.

However there is a big difference between putting a rocket into low earth
orbit for a week, than going to the moon and back.
Watch the videos, THINK, then come to your own conclusions.

But don't tell me something happened, just because you were told it did.


  #7  
Old June 10th 19, 08:36 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo



Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message ...

One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it
and judge for yourselves.


*** OK, one more time, you demented chromosome challenged weirdo: Radio
signals are directional. Pilots use the directional beacon of a radio
station near the airport at which they want to land and it displays the
direction, in degrees, on the screen of the direction finder.
Now the Russians would have loved nothing more than to expose the
"hoax", however, when they monitored the transmissions between the
astronauts and Ground control, they discovered that they beacon came
from the same spot on the Moon for the duration of each Moon landing. Not
from the orbiter, where the signal direction constantly moved and
even disappeared when the orbiter went to the "Dark Side". The beacons
are so accurate, that the Russkies could even determine the exact
location of each landing.
Secondly, on one of the landings the astronauts placed a reflector
plate to bounce back radar signals sent from Earth. The transit times
of the radar signals were measured and gave scientists the exact
distance of the Moon from Earth, which allowed them to calculate the
rate of recession, which is about 1.5 inches per year. The reflector
plate took quite some time to adjust for maximum effectiveness and that
could have only been done by manual finetuning made by astronauts on
the Moon.
So please, Bast, spare us any more of your ridiculous drivel about the
"Moon Landing Hoax" ... you are not well.







Hagar, how many times do I have to tell you that they were bouncing lasers
off the moon. long before Apollo.
And even if they did need this magical reflector pad you claim, that is
little more than 2 feet square.
It was claimed just to have prisms that reflect from every direction.
Much llike reflective tape on a yellow construction vest, or even a movie
screen
What makes you think it could not have just been sent there by an unmanned
lander ?

Do you have any idea how wide even a laser would diverge going to the moon
and back.
ANSWER - A lot more than 2 FEET


And radio / TV signals have been bounced off satelites since the 1950's
So tell me why that same unmanned lander the put your magical reflctor on
the moon, could not also be reflecting radio signals from earth.
NO MEN NEEDED


  #8  
Old June 10th 19, 09:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo

On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 12:11:07 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ

Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it
and judge for yourselves.

You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a
conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's
Bible Blessings" too?

Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours...

http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon

"Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny
Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo,
strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature
conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in
the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually
filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was
not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are
immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history
and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command
Module or accurate mockup," says McDade."

You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you
are proud of it!








giggle Wikipedia ?
Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake
news is so much funnier.
You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy,
fiction stories.

Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The
Moon "
And you can view it here,...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4


I watch all launching first hand.They were 100% true.Than GOPer Mafia killed JFK and we got 43 years of stuttles thanks to Nixon Annenberg and Kissinger.During those 43 years Walter Annenberg stole 2 billion each year.86 billion WOW so sad o true.Bert



Yes, I watched too live on my black and white television while Neil Armstrong took his firs tentative step onto the surface of the Moon! How could they fake that? With all the delayed and cancelled launches along the line, Hollywood would have scripted it much better!

During those Shuttle years, you never heard the mainline media complain about the stalled space program, did you?

Double-A

  #9  
Old June 10th 19, 09:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy
palsing[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,068
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo

On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 12:37:27 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:

Do you have any idea how wide even a laser would diverge going to the moon
and back.
ANSWER - A lot more than 2 FEET


Are you incapable of doing your own research? Do you learn everything you know from bloggers?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_...ing_experiment

"At the Moon's surface, the beam is about 6.5 kilometers (4.0 mi) wide and scientists liken the task of aiming the beam to using a rifle to hit a moving dime 3 kilometers (1.9 mi) away. The reflected light is too weak to see with the human eye. Out of 1017 photons aimed at the reflector, only one is received back on Earth, even under good conditions. They can be identified as originating from the laser because the laser is highly monochromatic. This is one of the most precise distance measurements ever made... and is equivalent in accuracy to determining the distance between Los Angeles and New York to within 0.25 mm (0.01 in)."

Sure, you think little of Wikipedia, but their articles are heavily referenced and are highly respected sources of information, in general...

https://www.livescience.com/7946-wik...-accurate.html

"Well-sourced articles written according to Wikipedia guidelines should have citations listed at the bottom of each page, with links to other information sources. This means that savvy readers can use Wikipedia as an information hub to follow the link trail to more expert or authoritative websites, and students can likewise find useful primary sources through Wikipedia."

How many of your precious bloggers give such references? Hmmmmm?



  #10  
Old June 11th 19, 12:36 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo



palsing wrote:
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 12:37:27 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:

Do you have any idea how wide even a laser would diverge going to the
moon and back.
ANSWER - A lot more than 2 FEET


Are you incapable of doing your own research? Do you learn everything
you know from bloggers?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_...ing_experiment

"At the Moon's surface, the beam is about 6.5 kilometers (4.0 mi) wide
and scientists liken the task of aiming the beam to using a rifle to
hit a moving dime 3 kilometers (1.9 mi) away. The reflected light is
too weak to see with the human eye. Out of 1017 photons aimed at the
reflector, only one is received back on Earth, even under good
conditions. They can be identified as originating from the laser
because the laser is highly monochromatic. This is one of the most
precise distance measurements ever made... and is equivalent in
accuracy to determining the distance between Los Angeles and New York
to within 0.25 mm (0.01 in)."

Sure, you think little of Wikipedia, but their articles are heavily
referenced and are highly respected sources of information, in
general...

https://www.livescience.com/7946-wik...-accurate.html

"Well-sourced articles written according to Wikipedia guidelines should
have citations listed at the bottom of each page, with links to other
information sources. This means that savvy readers can use Wikipedia as
an information hub to follow the link trail to more expert or
authoritative websites, and students can likewise find useful primary
sources through Wikipedia."

How many of your precious bloggers give such references? Hmmmmm?







Wikipedia again ?
giggle They NEVER LEARN


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proof that Apollo 11 happened mick Amateur Astronomy 12 September 5th 07 08:08 PM
Was the Apollo moon landing faked? HERE'S PROOF Brian Pemberton Space Shuttle 0 November 18th 03 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.