|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1431
|
|||
|
|||
why did Kupie Woopie delete himself?
On Nov 9, 8:09*pm, John Gogo wrote:
On Nov 9, 8:05*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote: you cannot answer a single question for your *soi-dissant* theory of every thing. thus: I only found one thing, that relates the continuing rate of supply of mel****er, compared to the recent *surge*; "surge" is really the only applicable term, and it could be because of "not the very first thing that a French glacialologist thinks of." there was a good survey article about this subject, re Alaskan glaciers, in Eos, a few months ago; totally non-extremist, Denierist or Confirmerist format. thus quoth: Because the amount of precipitation has not changed much over the past few decades, researchers blame rising temperatures for the glacial retreat Three-quarters of the Earth is ocean. *If ocean temperatures are rising- that should be a major red flag! *That should be the canary in a coal mine. Or, maybe, there is no controlling ourselves. |
#1432
|
|||
|
|||
why did Kupie Woopie delete himself?
On Nov 9, 8:18*pm, John Gogo wrote:
On Nov 9, 8:09*pm, John Gogo wrote: On Nov 9, 8:05*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote: you cannot answer a single question for your *soi-dissant* theory of every thing. thus: I only found one thing, that relates the continuing rate of supply of mel****er, compared to the recent *surge*; "surge" is really the only applicable term, and it could be because of "not the very first thing that a French glacialologist thinks of." there was a good survey article about this subject, re Alaskan glaciers, in Eos, a few months ago; totally non-extremist, Denierist or Confirmerist format. thus quoth: Because the amount of precipitation has not changed much over the past few decades, researchers blame rising temperatures for the glacial retreat Three-quarters of the Earth is ocean. *If ocean temperatures are rising- that should be a major red flag! *That should be the canary in a coal mine. Or, maybe, there is no controlling ourselves. Or, maybe this is just a 100 year weather cycle for which we are so ignorant of? |
#1433
|
|||
|
|||
why did Kupie Woopie delete himself?
On Nov 9, 8:20*pm, John Gogo wrote:
On Nov 9, 8:18*pm, John Gogo wrote: On Nov 9, 8:09*pm, John Gogo wrote: On Nov 9, 8:05*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote: you cannot answer a single question for your *soi-dissant* theory of every thing. thus: I only found one thing, that relates the continuing rate of supply of mel****er, compared to the recent *surge*; "surge" is really the only applicable term, and it could be because of "not the very first thing that a French glacialologist thinks of." there was a good survey article about this subject, re Alaskan glaciers, in Eos, a few months ago; totally non-extremist, Denierist or Confirmerist format. thus quoth: Because the amount of precipitation has not changed much over the past few decades, researchers blame rising temperatures for the glacial retreat Three-quarters of the Earth is ocean. *If ocean temperatures are rising- that should be a major red flag! *That should be the canary in a coal mine. Or, maybe, there is no controlling ourselves. Or, maybe this is just a 100 year weather cycle for which we are so ignorant of? Maybe, we could consider a 100 or 1000 times of human population for Earth so easily to take? Maybe not. How do we begin to measure what the Earth can take? |
#1434
|
|||
|
|||
why did Kupie Woopie delete himself?
careful, John, or JAA will assume that you love his "theory
of every thing." |
#1435
|
|||
|
|||
why did Kupie Woopie delete himself?
On Oct 30, 8:04*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: your pancakes are totally bizarre. *anyway, there was a technological aplication of polaraization to cellphone towers & phones, essentially showing that polarization is 3d, not 2d as known by the usual terms of "circular," "right" and left polarization. but, actually, light isn't particles, in any measurable way; it is waves. *only the photoelectric effect can possibly be interpreted as teh result of "little )d rocks o'light," or pancakes, or what have you. thus: earthscientists do not know spehrical geometry, as with the angle of total reflection off of water, which is really quite something of a lacunum. my other main point is that GRACE et al prove that AnIS and GrIS have only risen, since the beginning of measurement, around the IGY ('57-9); from this, it is easy to draw some conclusion, as to what is actually occurring -- not "global" warming, which is merely a nonsequiter from "glaas haus FX." 1tree: It's possible you could be the last man standing by insisting that light is waves. However, light is massless tangles of IOTAs that have a pancake-like shape. I have never said photons are like 'rocks'. One of the nuts from your history book probably said that. — NoEinstein — |
#1436
|
|||
|
|||
why did Kupie Woopie delete himself?
On Oct 30, 8:10*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: your "explanation of the horrible wrongness of Huyghens/Liebniz/Coriolis" is simply because, you never learned fraction in middle school, and thus how to keep account of units & dimensions. maybe, though, you could see that the "Coriolis effect" can also be a force, something taht I have stated for years. Two same size, but different mass spheres that have the SAME kinetic energy upon impacting soft clay will both embed in the clay identical amounts. that doesn't make any sense, at all; KE always includes the mass, whether or not you believe that "momentum equals force equals kinetic energy etc. 1tree: Get off the sauce! I've never said KE isn't a function of mass! My correct and proven equation, KE = a/g (m) + v/32.!74 (m) has MASS in two places. Can't you read? Ha, ha, HA! — NoEinstein — |
#1437
|
|||
|
|||
light is wavy; see Young's write-ups
an IQ of 85 is very respectable, dood.
I really don't believe that you read that stuff in German and Enlgish, and still have these weird theories, if they are theories; maybe, they just "come to you in a flash of funkiness “the DOPY One”. Einstein flunked out of H. S. and his father had to it is true, that he was not the greatest student, and apparently relied upon Mileva to (say) get thte gist of Foppl's textbook. however, he has an incredible track-record of collaborating with others, including to create several patents; you cannot argue with a patent, unless you are going to challenge it |
#1438
|
|||
|
|||
light is wavy; see Young's write-ups
On Monday, September 16, 2013 8:58:37 PM UTC-7, wrote:
an IQ of 85 is very respectable, dood. I really don't believe that you read that stuff in German and Enlgish, and still have these weird theories, if they are theories; maybe, they just "come to you in a flash of funkiness “the DOPY One”. Einstein flunked out of H. S. and his father had to it is true, that he was not the greatest student, and apparently relied upon Mileva to (say) get thte gist of Foppl's textbook. however, he has an incredible track-record of collaborating with others, including to create several patents; you cannot argue with a patent, unless you are going to challenge it |
#1439
|
|||
|
|||
light is wavy; see Young's write-ups
anyway, if Neinstein isn't in good health,
I apologize for responding in such an anachronistic way, such as challenging a public-domain patent I really don't believe that you read that stuff in German and English, question is, Why; it's like, I know that GPS tunrs my walker off (it's a shoppinkart when I get to Pacoioma but, wTf |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Understanding Einstein's simple derivation of the Lorentz Transformation | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 7 | August 9th 11 09:27 AM |
DARK ENERGY AND FLAT UNIVERSE EXPOSED BY SIMPLE METHOD -Einstein's assumption seemingly confirmed | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 26th 10 04:22 PM |
Einstein's Simple Mistake; All Big Bang Theorists Are Incorrect | John[_29_] | Misc | 51 | September 28th 10 12:25 PM |
Can time dilation be computed with just the Lorentztransformation and no other assumptions? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | July 24th 08 01:58 PM |
Key to understanding universe is understanding our brains | GatherNoMoss | Policy | 8 | October 3rd 06 01:27 PM |