A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 18th 09, 02:37 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,465
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 18, 6:20*am, doug wrote:

[...]

You are limiting yourself to the middle eastern gods of a certain
period and are leaving out the rest of the world's gods. You have
many to choose from.


Thor and Raven are superior choices.

[...]
  #22  
Old March 18th 09, 03:20 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

"doug" wrote in message
et...

[...]


Einstein (proved singularity, wormhole, length contraction, velocity cap
of 3e8 m/s)


Einstein is a great mind.



Ahhahaha! Special Relativity was written by Mileva Maric, and GR spacetime
by Minkovsky. He truly came out with the photoelectric effect and its
opposite E = mcc but really are plagiarized from ealier theories.

Einstein wrote 2 papers at the right time and I give him that but everything
else is flawed.

It is amazing the hatred and jealousy of the cranks for Einstein.
Relativity works. Get over it. You do not even know what relativity
says. All you know is you do not like it.

In ten years lets see who is still remembered
phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a
century of careful tests.



GR is a mapping of observations and cannot be used outside the galaxy. It
also disagrees with quantum mechanics.


That is a silly statement with no support.


God (will create infinite amount of universes on the fly accordingly)


Sorry, there are lots of gods to choose from so you will have
to specify which ones you mean.



Yahve, Jehovah or Allah are all the same god from Abraham.


You are limiting yourself to the middle eastern gods of a certain
period and are leaving out the rest of the world's gods. You have
many to choose from.


[...]


  #23  
Old March 18th 09, 03:24 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

"Igor" wrote in message
...

Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR?




# 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible?


No experiment here from Phil. Phil does not understand the
data he is referring to and why it is not in conflict with anything.

# 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of
exit in the Cartesian coordinate system?


Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. Lots of misplaced anxiety.

# 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly
the speed of light. I have two cannons that look like the following:
http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG

Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. From each cannon I
launch at c - epsilon:
1) two balls at the exact same moment
2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval
3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope

So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on
the ground with a camera in his
hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion.


This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can
actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can
wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a
scientific argument.



Unfortunately here are their final grades:
Sam: 33% (A)
Greg: 0% (F)
Peter: 0% (F)
Doug: -33% (F)

As I said, Sam should be offended. A high score from a crank is
a serious insult.


This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle
and his holy grail.

Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. Try again.


  #24  
Old March 19th 09, 12:30 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Igor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 185
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 18, 12:06Â*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"Igor" wrote in message

...



Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR?


# 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible?

# 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of
exit in the Cartesian coordinate system?

# 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly
the speed of light. Â*I have two cannons that look like the following:http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG

Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. Â*From each cannon I
launch at c - epsilon:
1) two balls at the exact same moment
2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval
3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope

So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on
the ground with a camera in his
hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion.

Unfortunately here are their final grades:
Sam: 33% (A)
Greg: 0% (F)
Peter: 0% (F)
Doug: -33% (F)

This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle
and his holy grail.


And this is the story of the learning disabled idiot who failed to
answer my query. Scientific hypotheses can only be tested by
experiment. In case you've never heard of that word, here's the
lowdown from dictionary.com:

ex⋅per⋅i⋅ment   /n. ɪkˈspɛrəmənt; v. ɛkˈspɛrəˌmɛnt/ [n. ik-sper-uh-
muhnt; v. ek-sper-uh-ment] –noun

1. a test, trial, or tentative procedure; an act or operation for the
purpose of discovering something unknown or of testing a principle,
supposition, etc.: a chemical experiment; a teaching experiment; an
experiment in living.
2. the conducting of such operations; experimentation: a product that
is the result of long experiment.
3. Obsolete. experience.

–verb (used without object) 4. to try or test, esp. in order to
discover or prove something: to experiment with a new procedure.

  #25  
Old March 19th 09, 05:51 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 17, 1:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda
will
take:
2.6e4 years


GR anticipates:
2.5e6 years


This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. *For Alpha
Centauri
we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference.


Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and
intergalactical contexts are included in the book. *A visual representation
of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special
Relativity, is also included.

The title will be available soon at the following location:https://www.createspace.com/3370163

-Phil


In this group of mostly incest mutated mindsets, sadly you'll not get
very far.

~ BG
  #26  
Old March 19th 09, 05:58 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 17, 8:15*pm, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"doug" wrote in message

et...

[...]

Einstein is a great mind. In ten years lets see who is still remembered
phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a
century of careful tests.


"If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only
have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more
plants, no more animals, no more man." -- Albert Einstein

[...]


So, now we know the bee disorder (aka CCD) is an Einstein plot in
order to get rid of most life on Earth. (just kidding, but thus far
it's working)

~ BG
  #27  
Old March 19th 09, 05:59 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Puppet_Sock
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 60
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 17, 5:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda
will
take:
2.6e4 years


GR anticipates:
2.5e6 years


This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. *For Alpha
Centauriy
we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference.


Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and
intergalactical contexts are included in the book. *A visual representation
of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special
Relativity, is also included.


Anybody who misunderstands significant digits that badly
is unlikely to understand the arithmetic involved in relativity,
never mind how to calculate how long it predicts light will
take to get from one place to another.

Even supposing the times quoted were in some way accurate,
which I'm disinclined to check, two digit quantities of time cannot
produce five digits of relative change, still less the eleven digits
quoted later.

There are fail passages in the immediate vicinity.
Socks
  #28  
Old March 19th 09, 06:00 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 17, 8:41*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Phil Bouchard wrote:

"If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only
have four years of life left.


* *Phil, you don't eat fish? Grubs? Worms? Mushrooms? Wheat? What
* *about the animal-pollinated plants such as tomatoes, onions, avocados,
* *beans, green peppers, chili peppers, lemons, limes, and oranges,
* *berries, vanilla, sugar, almonds, watermelons and apples that can be
* *pollinated by butterflies and wasps?

* *It's true that nearly one third of global food production depends on
* *pollination by animals. But that's only a third.

* *Four years, eh?


Einstein wasn't always right, so perhaps it'll take 16 years to get
our population down to 10%, or at least somewhat less than a billion.

~ BG
  #29  
Old March 19th 09, 06:04 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof


"Greg Neill" wrote in message
m...

Haha indeed. Phil *STILL* hasn't spotted the flaws in
his setup that makes it a washout for demonstrating SR
effects.


You are excessively confident because neither any precondition on the way
the balls are launched nor the measured length taken in picture have any
relevance for your defense.


  #30  
Old March 19th 09, 06:06 AM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On Mar 18, 6:24*am, doug wrote:
Phil Bouchard wrote:
"Igor" wrote in message
...


Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR?


# 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible?


No experiment here from Phil. Phil does not understand the
data he is referring to and why it is not in conflict with anything.



# 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of
exit in the Cartesian coordinate system?


Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. *Lots of misplaced anxiety.



# 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly
the speed of light. *I have two cannons that look like the following:
http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG


Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. *From each cannon I
launch at c - epsilon:
1) two balls at the exact same moment
2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval
3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope


So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on
the ground with a camera in his
hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion.


This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can
actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can
wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a
scientific argument.



Unfortunately here are their final grades:
Sam: 33% (A)
Greg: 0% (F)
Peter: 0% (F)
Doug: -33% (F)


As I said, Sam should be offended. A high score from a crank is
a serious insult.



This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle
and his holy grail.


Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. *Try again.



What's quantum about real world and objectively measured FTL tunnel
time?

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite Relativism: Review Request Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 519 September 25th 12 12:26 AM
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 0 January 28th 09 10:54 AM
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 4 January 26th 09 10:00 PM
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 January 1st 09 04:20 PM
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 13th 08 01:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.