|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 18, 6:20*am, doug wrote:
[...] You are limiting yourself to the middle eastern gods of a certain period and are leaving out the rest of the world's gods. You have many to choose from. Thor and Raven are superior choices. [...] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: "doug" wrote in message et... [...] Einstein (proved singularity, wormhole, length contraction, velocity cap of 3e8 m/s) Einstein is a great mind. Ahhahaha! Special Relativity was written by Mileva Maric, and GR spacetime by Minkovsky. He truly came out with the photoelectric effect and its opposite E = mcc but really are plagiarized from ealier theories. Einstein wrote 2 papers at the right time and I give him that but everything else is flawed. It is amazing the hatred and jealousy of the cranks for Einstein. Relativity works. Get over it. You do not even know what relativity says. All you know is you do not like it. In ten years lets see who is still remembered phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a century of careful tests. GR is a mapping of observations and cannot be used outside the galaxy. It also disagrees with quantum mechanics. That is a silly statement with no support. God (will create infinite amount of universes on the fly accordingly) Sorry, there are lots of gods to choose from so you will have to specify which ones you mean. Yahve, Jehovah or Allah are all the same god from Abraham. You are limiting yourself to the middle eastern gods of a certain period and are leaving out the rest of the world's gods. You have many to choose from. [...] |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: "Igor" wrote in message ... Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR? # 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible? No experiment here from Phil. Phil does not understand the data he is referring to and why it is not in conflict with anything. # 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of exit in the Cartesian coordinate system? Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. Lots of misplaced anxiety. # 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly the speed of light. I have two cannons that look like the following: http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. From each cannon I launch at c - epsilon: 1) two balls at the exact same moment 2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval 3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on the ground with a camera in his hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion. This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a scientific argument. Unfortunately here are their final grades: Sam: 33% (A) Greg: 0% (F) Peter: 0% (F) Doug: -33% (F) As I said, Sam should be offended. A high score from a crank is a serious insult. This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle and his holy grail. Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. Try again. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 18, 12:06Â*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"Igor" wrote in message ... Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR? # 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible? # 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of exit in the Cartesian coordinate system? # 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly the speed of light. Â*I have two cannons that look like the following:http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. Â*From each cannon I launch at c - epsilon: 1) two balls at the exact same moment 2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval 3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on the ground with a camera in his hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion. Unfortunately here are their final grades: Sam: 33% (A) Greg: 0% (F) Peter: 0% (F) Doug: -33% (F) This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle and his holy grail. And this is the story of the learning disabled idiot who failed to answer my query. Scientific hypotheses can only be tested by experiment. In case you've never heard of that word, here's the lowdown from dictionary.com: exâ‹…perâ‹…iâ‹…ment   /n. ɪkˈspÉ›rÉ™mÉ™nt; v. É›kˈspÉ›rəˌmÉ›nt/ [n. ik-sper-uh- muhnt; v. ek-sper-uh-ment] –noun 1. a test, trial, or tentative procedure; an act or operation for the purpose of discovering something unknown or of testing a principle, supposition, etc.: a chemical experiment; a teaching experiment; an experiment in living. 2. the conducting of such operations; experimentation: a product that is the result of long experiment. 3. Obsolete. experience. –verb (used without object) 4. to try or test, esp. in order to discover or prove something: to experiment with a new procedure. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 1:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda will take: 2.6e4 years GR anticipates: 2.5e6 years This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. *For Alpha Centauri we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference. Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and intergalactical contexts are included in the book. *A visual representation of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special Relativity, is also included. The title will be available soon at the following location:https://www.createspace.com/3370163 -Phil In this group of mostly incest mutated mindsets, sadly you'll not get very far. ~ BG |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 8:15*pm, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
"doug" wrote in message et... [...] Einstein is a great mind. In ten years lets see who is still remembered phil, the newly arrived crank or Einstein whose work has withstood a century of careful tests. "If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man." -- Albert Einstein [...] So, now we know the bee disorder (aka CCD) is an Einstein plot in order to get rid of most life on Earth. (just kidding, but thus far it's working) ~ BG |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 5:38*am, "Phil Bouchard" wrote:
FR predicts a light beam from Earth to a similar planet from Andromeda will take: 2.6e4 years GR anticipates: 2.5e6 years This makes the light beam 9,705.9% faster at that scale. *For Alpha Centauriy we were talking about a 100.00080373% difference. Detailed information of all variables used in the interstellar and intergalactical contexts are included in the book. *A visual representation of the test I gave, which disproves length contraction and therefore Special Relativity, is also included. Anybody who misunderstands significant digits that badly is unlikely to understand the arithmetic involved in relativity, never mind how to calculate how long it predicts light will take to get from one place to another. Even supposing the times quoted were in some way accurate, which I'm disinclined to check, two digit quantities of time cannot produce five digits of relative change, still less the eleven digits quoted later. There are fail passages in the immediate vicinity. Socks |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 17, 8:41*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Phil Bouchard wrote: "If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. * *Phil, you don't eat fish? Grubs? Worms? Mushrooms? Wheat? What * *about the animal-pollinated plants such as tomatoes, onions, avocados, * *beans, green peppers, chili peppers, lemons, limes, and oranges, * *berries, vanilla, sugar, almonds, watermelons and apples that can be * *pollinated by butterflies and wasps? * *It's true that nearly one third of global food production depends on * *pollination by animals. But that's only a third. * *Four years, eh? Einstein wasn't always right, so perhaps it'll take 16 years to get our population down to 10%, or at least somewhat less than a billion. ~ BG |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
"Greg Neill" wrote in message m... Haha indeed. Phil *STILL* hasn't spotted the flaws in his setup that makes it a washout for demonstrating SR effects. You are excessively confident because neither any precondition on the way the balls are launched nor the measured length taken in picture have any relevance for your defense. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Mar 18, 6:24*am, doug wrote:
Phil Bouchard wrote: "Igor" wrote in message ... Please explain what experiment(s) you performed to falsify SR? # 1. Why "instantaneity" was proven if GR says it's impossible? No experiment here from Phil. Phil does not understand the data he is referring to and why it is not in conflict with anything. # 2. If Einstein-Rosen Bridges do exist, what defines its exact point of exit in the Cartesian coordinate system? Nope, no experiment by Phil here either. *Lots of misplaced anxiety. # 3. Einstein said there is length contraction when an object travels nearly the speed of light. *I have two cannons that look like the following: http://www.dkimages.com/discover/pre...1/45045356.JPG Now imagine there is no distance between the cannons. *From each cannon I launch at c - epsilon: 1) two balls at the exact same moment 2) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval 3) two balls with a 3.333e-9 s interval and tied together with rope So I wanted to know what would happen if there is an observer standing on the ground with a camera in his hands and taking pictures of the balls in motion. This is hilarious. You have no idea what relativity says. You can actually read about it and find out how little you know or you can wallow in your ignorance. You seem to take your stupidity as a scientific argument. Unfortunately here are their final grades: Sam: 33% (A) Greg: 0% (F) Peter: 0% (F) Doug: -33% (F) As I said, Sam should be offended. A high score from a crank is a serious insult. This is the story of the knights who failed to defend Einstein the miracle and his holy grail. Relativity is stil fine. GPS still works etc. *Try again. What's quantum about real world and objectively measured FTL tunnel time? ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 10:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 10:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 04:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |