#11
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
You would be esentially setting up a Jewlers shop since that kind of technology was pretty well established at that time of couse everything was done by hand at that time. So while your at it you could invent the battery the chemicals existed at that time its what they used in there tanneries the generator needs a way tmake copper wire how about gun powder too. Clear Skies Dwight L Bogan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
Bernardz wrote in
news:MPG.1aa32e61522659a398991e@news: I am writing a what-if history fiction and need some help. If you were suddenly dropped in Rome say in 200 CE and you needed to build a telescope for mass production. What sort of telescope would you make and what would it look like? I'd build a newtonian reflecting telescope with a metal mirror. The romans certainly could cast a bronze disk a few inches in diameter. You would have to experiment with abrasives to grind and polish it. Yeah, the reflectivity would be low, and it would have to be repolished every couple months as it tarnished but it would work. Maybe a light coating of olive oil could keep it from tarnishing ha. Depends on how good the optics would have to be. If cost were no object, gold or silver could be used. Gold would not tarnish. Maybe you could use Gold for the secondary mirrors. Bryan |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
Bernardz wrote in
news:MPG.1aa32e61522659a398991e@news: I am writing a what-if history fiction and need some help. If you were suddenly dropped in Rome say in 200 CE and you needed to build a telescope for mass production. What sort of telescope would you make and what would it look like? I'd build a newtonian reflecting telescope with a metal mirror. The romans certainly could cast a bronze disk a few inches in diameter. You would have to experiment with abrasives to grind and polish it. Yeah, the reflectivity would be low, and it would have to be repolished every couple months as it tarnished but it would work. Maybe a light coating of olive oil could keep it from tarnishing ha. Depends on how good the optics would have to be. If cost were no object, gold or silver could be used. Gold would not tarnish. Maybe you could use Gold for the secondary mirrors. Bryan |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
On 2004-02-22, starman wrote:
The hard part would be making optical quality glass in 200-CE. Lenses could be made from rock crystal. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
On 2004-02-22, starman wrote:
The hard part would be making optical quality glass in 200-CE. Lenses could be made from rock crystal. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
On 22 Feb 2004 15:37:14 GMT, Jon Isaacs wrote:
That's not what I'd build if I were dropped into that period of history. I'd make a Newtonian reflector. It would be quite practical to build one 4-6 inches in aperture using commonly available materials. The quality of the glass can be much lower with a reflecting telescope, and there is less glass grinding required. The only lens would be the ocular- much smaller than a refractive objective. A Newtonian was my first thought but silvering the mirror seemed like the real problem. Newtonian mirrors were metal until sometime in the 1800's... When a simple (though messy) chemical process was figured out to deposit silver. If you know this process (basically, silver nitrate, ammonia, and glucose are all that's required), it would be possible to duplicate it with the materials available at the time (increasing human knowledge of chemistry at the same time). I guess one could make a silver Newtonian mirror. Why not one made of aluminum? Though sufficient quantities of aluminum would be challenging to find (and impossible to refine from ore with existing technology), such a mirror would be lighter, stronger, and more resistant to tarnish and corrosion. But all metal mirrors would suffer from expansion issues. It would be more practical to work out the silvering process. I don't expect to hear from uncle Rod on this one, pretty difficult to make an SCT in 200BC... Yes, the corrector would be quite a challenge. A MCT, however, might just be doable, though still quite difficult (and it would require the ability to silver glass, unless an independant secondary design were used). -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
On 22 Feb 2004 15:37:14 GMT, Jon Isaacs wrote:
That's not what I'd build if I were dropped into that period of history. I'd make a Newtonian reflector. It would be quite practical to build one 4-6 inches in aperture using commonly available materials. The quality of the glass can be much lower with a reflecting telescope, and there is less glass grinding required. The only lens would be the ocular- much smaller than a refractive objective. A Newtonian was my first thought but silvering the mirror seemed like the real problem. Newtonian mirrors were metal until sometime in the 1800's... When a simple (though messy) chemical process was figured out to deposit silver. If you know this process (basically, silver nitrate, ammonia, and glucose are all that's required), it would be possible to duplicate it with the materials available at the time (increasing human knowledge of chemistry at the same time). I guess one could make a silver Newtonian mirror. Why not one made of aluminum? Though sufficient quantities of aluminum would be challenging to find (and impossible to refine from ore with existing technology), such a mirror would be lighter, stronger, and more resistant to tarnish and corrosion. But all metal mirrors would suffer from expansion issues. It would be more practical to work out the silvering process. I don't expect to hear from uncle Rod on this one, pretty difficult to make an SCT in 200BC... Yes, the corrector would be quite a challenge. A MCT, however, might just be doable, though still quite difficult (and it would require the ability to silver glass, unless an independant secondary design were used). -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:24:19 +1100, Bernardz wrote:
I am writing a what-if history fiction and need some help. If you were suddenly dropped in Rome say in 200 CE and you needed to build a telescope for mass production. What sort of telescope would you make and what would it look like? A Newtonian, for certain. It's by far the simplest to make, and would outperform any refractor with the materials available. It would likely look much the same as a home-built Dobsonian-mounted Newtonian does today. -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Roman telescope
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:24:19 +1100, Bernardz wrote:
I am writing a what-if history fiction and need some help. If you were suddenly dropped in Rome say in 200 CE and you needed to build a telescope for mass production. What sort of telescope would you make and what would it look like? A Newtonian, for certain. It's by far the simplest to make, and would outperform any refractor with the materials available. It would likely look much the same as a home-built Dobsonian-mounted Newtonian does today. -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8.4-meter Mirror Successfully Installed in Large Binocular Telescope | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 9th 04 08:06 PM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | November 11th 03 08:16 AM |
World's Single Largest Telescope Mirror Moves To The LBT | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 5th 03 09:27 PM |
Lowell Observatory and Discovery Communications Announce Partnership To Build Innovative Telescope Technology | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | October 16th 03 06:17 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |