|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero?
e.g. Omega Centauri or M13 for example. Is the NET angular momentum of an elliptical galaxy and or the central bulge of a spiral, zero or close to zero..........oblate spheroids might have a net angular momentum if the oblate geometry is due to rotation in a single direction. But if it's due to net rotation 50 / 50 in two opposite directions, again, there would be no net angular momentum, right? rt [[Mod. note -- I think the answers are Yes (or very close to zero), Yes, and Yes (respectively). -- jt]] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
In article , Martin Brown
writes: Is the NET angular momentum of an elliptical galaxy and or the central bulge of a spiral, zero or close to zero..........oblate spheroids might have a net angular momentum if the oblate geometry is due to rotation in a single direction. [[Mod. note -- I think the answers are Yes (or very close to zero), Yes, and Yes (respectively). -- jt]] Indeed. A reasonable treatment of the evolution of gravitationally bound clusters of stars is online at Caltech minus a few diagrams: http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~george...y20-Lec15x.pdf I'm no expert in this field, but I think that it might be a bit more complicated. Look up "fast rotator" and "slow rotator" in the context of elliptical galaxies. This might be a place to start: http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~b...rly-types.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
OK, so far great, close to zero net angular momentum in a globular or
elliptical. Please keep in mind I'm attempting to march down a Gedanken path, and am not proposing anything that is likely. Now, if I have an elliptical with zero angular momentum, this is not to say there is no momentum. Clearly there is a lot of momentum and each star contributes an angular momentum vector to the total sum, which is zero. If I establish a coordinate system X,Y,Z, then I can sum the angular momentum about each axis with a SMBH at coordinate 0,0,0 at the origin as a reference position. As this has been decades since I've crunched these equations, perhaps my terms need updating so please feel free to change my variables. I'll use L for angular momentum. I can sum angular momentum about each of the principle axis'. For each axis, I get some number of objects moving around the axis with one orientation, and another number of objects moving in the reverse sense. So, I can sum them as total angular momentum L L = aL_x + (-bL_x) + cL_y + (-dL_y) + eL_z + (-fL_z) = 0 So, a=b, c=d, and e=f. And for a typical elliptical or globular, without oblateness, we can probably go further and say that a=b=c=d=e=f. In other words, objects are moving about the origin in all possible orientations, they are thermalized, and there is no net angular momentum. But this does not mean there is no angular momentum. The stars possess a lot of momentum, it's just all randomized. [Moderator's note: This is not necessarily the case. It is also possible---probable?---that each individual star has zero angular momentum with respect to the SBH at the center, i.e. executes a back-and-forth motion, passing through the centre of the galaxy. Stars are few and far between, so this is possible without an appreciable number of collisions. -P.H.] If this seems about correct, then I'll move forward to the next step in the Gedanken path, working with a galaxy that starts off with only L = aL_x and with all of the rest of the components initially zero. Have I made a mistake so far? rt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 12:46:59 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero? e.g. Omega Centauri or M13 for example. .... [[Mod. note -- I think the answers are Yes (or very close to zero), Yes, and Yes (respectively). -- jt]] I'm not sure that's the case. Searching for "globular cluster rotational flattening" gives a lot of papers that discuss the rotational dynamics of globulars. I would say the consensus is, there is significant angular momentum in some globulars. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
In article ,
writes: Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero? I think that's the case for most clusters, but I vaguely remember that there are a tiny number that show rotation. I might be mistaken on either part of this. Is the NET angular momentum of an elliptical galaxy and or the central bulge of a spiral, zero or close to zero For elliptical galaxies, a quick web search turned up https://academic-oup-com/mnras/artic...6.2011.18496.x The authors claim 86% of early type galaxies are "fast rotators." I haven't studied the paper to find out what that means or what sample they defined. I expect there are many more works on this subject; as I say, it was a very quick search. There are also lots of theory papers simulating major mergers, from which elliptical galaxies are supposed to form. The simulation results must include a final angular momentum. -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
Steve Willner wrote:
In article , writes: Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero? I think that's the case for most clusters, but I vaguely remember that there are a tiny number that show rotation. I might be mistaken on either part of this. As I recall dimly from either reading or hearing talks about this, Omega Cen appears slightly oblate, although I do not know what if any radial velocity observations confirm that this is due to rotation. And it may be the core of a small galaxy captured by the MWG long ago, rather than being a "classical" globular. Mike Dworetsky Is the NET angular momentum of an elliptical galaxy and or the central bulge of a spiral, zero or close to zero For elliptical galaxies, a quick web search turned up https://academic-oup-com/mnras/artic...6.2011.18496.x The authors claim 86% of early type galaxies are "fast rotators." I haven't studied the paper to find out what that means or what sample they defined. I expect there are many more works on this subject; as I say, it was a very quick search. There are also lots of theory papers simulating major mergers, from which elliptical galaxies are supposed to form. The simulation results must include a final angular momentum. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
On 04/04/2017 05:29, Mike Dworetsky wrote:
Steve Willner wrote: In article , writes: Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero? I think that's the case for most clusters, but I vaguely remember that there are a tiny number that show rotation. I might be mistaken on either part of this. As I recall dimly from either reading or hearing talks about this, Omega Cen appears slightly oblate, although I do not know what if any radial velocity observations confirm that this is due to rotation. And it may be the core of a small galaxy captured by the MWG long ago, rather than being a "classical" globular. There was something in ApJ early stellar dynamics measurements mid 1990's showing that the luminosity oblateness varies with radius more or less spherical near the middle and far out but oblate in between. https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9612184.pdf They credit someone else in 1983 as having first measured the isophotes in 1983 and claim mean 0.121 minimum 0 up to 2', maximum 0.25 at 10' and then becoming rounder as you go further out. (see p6) -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:46:58 EDT, wrote:
Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero? ... Is the NET angular momentum of an elliptical galaxy and or the central bulge of a spiral, zero or close to zero I think the current status of thinking is long on theory and short on observations. I don't think there's been a single comprehensive survey of the actual stellar movements in any globular cluster. I'm not aware of any done for an elliptical galaxy either. Not long ago there was an idea of "tri-axial" rotation for these which implied that individual star orbits could be decomposed into 3 axial components which would somehow serve to keep the stars from plunging into the core. That doesn't seem to be de rigueur anymore. Also there was speculation some decades ago that globular cluster stars simply fell through the cluster cores in a sort of mass yo-yo action. Also not popular of late, I don't think. I had a notion which I publicized on these forums some years ago, that there's a gravitational scalar, as yet unmodelled, which allowed stars to freely float in such environments. I plead guilty for hand-waving on this, but it seems an elegant concept. Ugly facts begone! I mention all this because it looks to me that other answers on this thread are muddying up the distinction between theory and observation. If there've been cogent observations made recently on actual stellar orbits in globular clusters or ellipticals, I'd be glad to be directed to them. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
NET Angular Momentum of Globular cluster of stars
On 23/03/2017 22:23, Eric Flesch wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:46:58 EDT, wrote: Is the NET angular momentum of a globular cluster of stars, zero? ... Is the NET angular momentum of an elliptical galaxy and or the central bulge of a spiral, zero or close to zero I think the current status of thinking is long on theory and short on observations. I don't think there's been a single comprehensive survey of the actual stellar movements in any globular cluster. I'm not aware of any done for an elliptical galaxy either. I'm no expert in this apart from having known a few of the early practitioners of computational stellar dynamics but I think there are now some precision observations of stars in local globular clusters like Omega Centuri which show that things are never simple. http://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf.../aa3061-05.pdf and https://www.astro.umd.edu/~richard/A...ergy_equip.pdf There are plenty of velocity dispersion and luminosity measurements along lines of sight through various of the brighter Messier globular clusters dating from way back. eg M15 http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00251.000.html Not long ago there was an idea of "tri-axial" rotation for these which implied that individual star orbits could be decomposed into 3 axial components which would somehow serve to keep the stars from plunging into the core. That doesn't seem to be de rigueur anymore. Also there was speculation some decades ago that globular cluster stars simply fell through the cluster cores in a sort of mass yo-yo action. Also not popular of late, I don't think. I'm sure I have seen somewhere a claim that stars out on the fringes of clusters tend to be in very elongated orbits rather than circular ones. Certainly the eye tends to pick out spiky rays in for example M13 around the edges of the core. I had a notion which I publicized on these forums some years ago, that there's a gravitational scalar, as yet unmodelled, which allowed stars to freely float in such environments. I plead guilty for hand-waving on this, but it seems an elegant concept. Ugly facts begone! At a handwaving level a single test particle in an evolved spherically symmetric globular cluster moves in a gravitational potential that far out is roughly 1/r^2 but closer in becomes weaker and in the dense core becomes almost linear. This implies that a test particle will no longer follow an ellipse around the centre of mass but will instead trace out a somewhat more circular petal shape staying further away from the core. Self consistent models in phase space seem to be one interesting way of approaching it using maximum entropy or some other computational heuristic to create the most non-committal distribution of matter in consistent with a given mass M, energy E and angular moment L. Going through the core must increase the possibility of a three body close encounter from time to time resulting in ejection of stars and the condensation of the rest. I mention all this because it looks to me that other answers on this thread are muddying up the distinction between theory and observation. If there've been cogent observations made recently on actual stellar orbits in globular clusters or ellipticals, I'd be glad to be directed to them. On the simulation early evolution of star clusters this was published fairly recently, but I don't know enough to comment on its veracity. http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.o...t/368/1913/829 -- Regards, Martin Brown |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New M14: Globular Cluster with BRC250 + variable stars | Danilo Pivato | CCD Imaging | 1 | July 19th 11 08:45 AM |
New M14: Globular Cluster with BRC250 + variable stars | Danilo Pivato | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 17th 11 11:49 PM |
Angular Momentum | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 6 | July 26th 08 11:52 PM |
HUBBLE SEES FAINTEST STARS IN A GLOBULAR CLUSTER (STScI-PR06-37) | INBOX ASTRONOMY: NEWS ALERT | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 19th 06 10:56 PM |
HUBBLE SEES FAINTEST STARS IN A GLOBULAR CLUSTER (STScI-PR06-37) | INBOX ASTRONOMY: NEWS ALERT | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 18th 06 04:31 AM |