|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mars images update
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:51:14 +0100, "Russell Healey"
wrote: Setup #1 (Afocal): Magnification: 902*2/20=90.2x System focal length=70*90.2=6314 mm System focal ration = 6314 /101.9=f 61.96 call it f 62!! Setup #2 (Afocal): Magnification: 902/5=180.4x System focal length=70*180.4=12628 mm System focal ration = 12628 /101.9= f 124 My behind-the-scenes helper (I'll keep Mr Tonkin's identity hidden) pointed me to the formula yesterday. I wanted someone else to do the calculations independently though because to me f62 & f124 are figures that jump out at me as being rather extreme. Any imagers out there care to comment - or am I worrying about nothing? But I wish I was more a a practician than a theoretician when it comes to astrophotography - I'm still stuck between (1) Buying a digital camera and wading through the minefield of adapters and supports. Yes - it's easy for those of us who have slogged through the minefield and come out on the other side to forget just how many options there are out there. (2) Using my SLR with eyepiece adaptor / T adaptor and waiting "ages" for the results. Film vs digital. Go argue that one on rec.photo.digital. Astronomers are regarded as a minority on there and the arguments we put forward for digital over film don't carry much weight as a consequence. Cherry picking of arguments I think. What really amazes me are the images that were taken with really big scopes back in the mid-late 70's early 80's. By big, I'm talking 1.3m reflecators and 0.4m refractors. The images I saw in one of my old Mars books last weekend were made using film. What can I say? Imaging has come on a lot ;-) I have tried camera supported by separate tripod offered up to the eyepiece but I find this very tricky to get square and focussed. Russell Healey Orion Optics Europa 200mm f6 Seperate tripod to the eyepiece isn't going to work very well at all. If I can be so bold... I have an Orion Optics 250mm f4.8 (IIRC!). It's an older model and came on one of Orion's early GEM mounts. Although the mount is fine for visual work, it's pushing the limit photographically. You need a steady mount, and a decent RA drive (preferably DEC as well to help you get things set up correctly). I bought the accessory pack for my Europa which included a camera adapter. That's the same adapter I now use to attach my digicam to my Vixen refractor. Unfortunately, Mr naive here was a bit stupid and glued a coupling thread to the end of the adapter to allow it to fit my camera's thread. All I needed to get was a step-down ring for the camera. We live an learn g. Details of the adapter coupling can be found here... http://homepage.ntlworld.com/p.lawre...icoupling.html I don't know it this helps at all - if you need any additional info. about my set-up please just ask. -- Pete Homepage at http://www.pbl33.co.uk CCD/digicam astronomy |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA's images of Mars are the wrong color | Alert | Amateur Astronomy | 105 | February 15th 04 01:46 PM |
Reading about the lost ships to mars | Mark | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | December 28th 03 07:33 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |