Which is better to write: Ω or Omega_Total ?

Hi Art_Deco ( a.k.a. Duckie ), www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG
You told me: You're a kook, an underscore abuser.

Following the Modula-2/C++ tradition that I was raised on
( Modula-2 since the start of 1982, on the Lilith computer ),
I used indentifiers like Omega_Total in the W.PNG above
instead of the Ω characters found in the .PDF it references:
http://www.RSSD.ESA.INT/SA/PLANCK/do...(2005)1_V2.pdf

Which is better to write: Ω or Omega_Total ?
Which is more editable ? searchable ? readable ? assiduous ? you tell me.

"Jeff.Relf" wrote in message
...
Hi Art_Deco ( a.k.a. Duckie ), www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG
You told me: You're a kook, an underscore abuser.

Following the Modula-2/C++ tradition that I was raised on
( Modula-2 since the start of 1982, on the Lilith computer ),

Welcome to 2006 you retard.

Which is better to write: ? or Omega_Total ?

?

Which is more editable ? searchable ? readable ? assiduous ? you tell me.

? is better on all counts. If some one is searching for ? why should they
search for a word _you_ choose?

Its all irrelevant as you only act "different" to stand out and reclaim some
of your lost ego after your life collapsed around your ears.

T Wake wrote:

"Jeff.Relf" wrote in message
...
Hi Art_Deco ( a.k.a. Duckie ), www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG
You told me: You're a kook, an underscore abuser.

Learn to read, post, and quote, maroon.

Following the Modula-2/C++ tradition that I was raised on
( Modula-2 since the start of 1982, on the Lilith computer ),

Welcome to 2006 you retard.

Was underscoreboi attempting to claim he used C++ in 1982?

Which is better to write: ? or Omega_Total ?

?

Which is more editable ? searchable ? readable ? assiduous ? you tell me.

? is better on all counts. If some one is searching for ? why should they
search for a word _you_ choose?

Its all irrelevant as you only act "different" to stand out and reclaim some
of your lost ego after your life collapsed around your ears.

I don't think he will realize it when it happens.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

/BAH

Hi T_Wake, You're using Microsoft_Outlook_Express_6_00,
which, as far as I know, can handle things like Unicode.
So how did you manage to mangle the Ω ( Omega ) character like this:

Google.COM/group/sci.astro/msg/ba17ea7bdeb07014

Amazingly, one can Google for the Ω character ( but it's hard to type in ):

Google.COM/search?q=Ω
Google.COM/search?q=%CE%A9

In article , Jeff’ĶRelf
wrote:

Hi T_Wake, You're using Microsoft_Outlook_Express_6_00,
which, as far as I know, can handle things like Unicode.
So how did you manage to mangle the Ω ( Omega ) character like this:

Google.COM/group/sci.astro/msg/ba17ea7bdeb07014

Amazingly, one can Google for the Ω character ( but it's hard to type in ):

Google.COM/search?q=Ω
Google.COM/search?q=%CE%A9



Trim the SF groups, ****wit.

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.


This is USENET. As a result, I believe we are all free to read, and
post what we like. I happen to find JR's mangling of cosmology crap,
and I'm arguing against it.

No, you are not arguing against it. You simply repeat yourself
ad nauseum. You should find the archives, if they still exist,
of real flaming; it is an art form. Your repetition of the
same line is boring and not worth the CPU runtime to open up
and look.

If you don't like it, killfile us both. I
certainly won't lose any sleep over it.

I don't kilfile. I was simply explaining to you that,
if you wish others to read your posts and listen to what
you have to say, then make your posts worth reading.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

Well thanks for your opinion. Duly noted.

And, I suppose, ignored.

/BAH

In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you. Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here. He's now including
two rec.arts.sf groups in his screed (which is offtopic evene there).

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.


This is USENET. As a result, I believe we are all free to read, and
post what we like. I happen to find JR's mangling of cosmology crap,
and I'm arguing against it. If you don't like it, killfile us both. I
certainly won't lose any sleep over it.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

Well thanks for your opinion. Duly noted.


/BAH

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED