|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
ScienceShot: The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
Scientists explain unusual low in sunspot activity http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...-of-the-a.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... ScienceShot: The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots Scientists explain unusual low in sunspot activity http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...-of-the-a.html Caused by global warming. The very unusual drop in the number of sunspots has occurred at *exactly* the same time as man's production of anthropogenic gasses is at a maximum. This is a scientific fact which is beyond serious dispute. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
On 3/2/11 11:21 PM, Peter Webb wrote:
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... ScienceShot: The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots Scientists explain unusual low in sunspot activity http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...-of-the-a.html Caused by global warming. The very unusual drop in the number of sunspots has occurred at *exactly* the same time as man's production of anthropogenic gasses is at a maximum. This is a scientific fact which is beyond serious dispute. Anthropogenic gasses are continuing to increase and the sun will rev up to a solar maximum, etc. as it have been doing for millennia. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... On 3/2/11 11:21 PM, Peter Webb wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... ScienceShot: The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots Scientists explain unusual low in sunspot activity http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...-of-the-a.html Caused by global warming. The very unusual drop in the number of sunspots has occurred at *exactly* the same time as man's production of anthropogenic gasses is at a maximum. This is a scientific fact which is beyond serious dispute. Anthropogenic gasses are continuing to increase and the sun will rev up to a solar maximum, etc. as it have been doing for millennia. The difference is that previous solar maximums were natural. This is the first one caused by anthropogenic CO2 instead of naturally occurring CO2. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
On 3/3/11 12:17 AM, Peter Webb wrote:
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... On 3/2/11 11:21 PM, Peter Webb wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... ScienceShot: The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots Scientists explain unusual low in sunspot activity http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...-of-the-a.html Caused by global warming. The very unusual drop in the number of sunspots has occurred at *exactly* the same time as man's production of anthropogenic gasses is at a maximum. This is a scientific fact which is beyond serious dispute. Anthropogenic gasses are continuing to increase and the sun will rev up to a solar maximum, etc. as it have been doing for millennia. The difference is that previous solar maximums were natural. This is the first one caused by anthropogenic CO2 instead of naturally occurring CO2. Solar cycles are not cause by anything happening on the earth, Peter. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... On 3/3/11 12:17 AM, Peter Webb wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... On 3/2/11 11:21 PM, Peter Webb wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... ScienceShot: The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots Scientists explain unusual low in sunspot activity http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceno...-of-the-a.html Caused by global warming. The very unusual drop in the number of sunspots has occurred at *exactly* the same time as man's production of anthropogenic gasses is at a maximum. This is a scientific fact which is beyond serious dispute. Anthropogenic gasses are continuing to increase and the sun will rev up to a solar maximum, etc. as it have been doing for millennia. The difference is that previous solar maximums were natural. This is the first one caused by anthropogenic CO2 instead of naturally occurring CO2. Solar cycles are not cause by anything happening on the earth, Peter. Denial of evidence noted. Clear, compelling and strong inverse correlation between the number of reality TV shows and sunspot activity. Unprecedented, I might add, in previous solar minima. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
On 3 Mar., 07:30, Sam Wormley wrote:
* *Solar cycles are not cause by anything happening on the earth, Peter. A glance at St.Peter's profile clearly indicates that He carries the burden of superstition wherever he goes. It is his comfort blanket against the terror of the unknown. In St. Peter's case the blanket is worn rather like any other scruffy evangelist looking for a free meal of fish sandwiches with a half bottle of Château d'Eau. While continuing on the culinary theme: Others wear cooking foil helmets. My sympathy is with the latter if the climate warms as expected. Bad news for St.Peter though. Who must finally find somebody else to blame.. and (hopefully) forgive. ;-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
Peter Webb wrote:
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... On 3/3/11 12:17 AM, Peter Webb wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... On 3/2/11 11:21 PM, Peter Webb wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... Solar cycles are not cause by anything happening on the earth, Peter. Denial of evidence noted. Clear, compelling and strong inverse correlation between the number of reality TV shows and sunspot activity. Unprecedented, I might add, in previous solar minima. Correlation is a necessary condition for there to be causation, but it is not a sufficient condition to demonstrate it, even in the realm of reality... Mike. -- If reply address is (invalid), remove spurious "@" and substitute "plus" for +. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
On Mar 2, 11:30*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 3/3/11 12:17 AM, Peter Webb wrote: The difference is that previous solar maximums were natural. This is the first one caused by anthropogenic CO2 instead of naturally occurring CO2. * *Solar cycles are not cause by anything happening on the earth, Peter. I think he knows that, and this is an attempt at sarcasm on his part. Some might say, though, that this natural occurrence was caused by a beneficent God temporarily protecting us from the consequences of our poor stewardship of the Earth. But then a solar maximum will come - fortunately, coinciding with the part of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation that lowers world temperatures naturally. Eventually, though, the day of reckoning will come. If we don't get fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions under control before the natural cycles start making things worse instead of better. Natural cycles exist; human behavior also exists and has consequences. John Savard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The Mystery of the Absent Sunspots
Solar cycles are not cause by anything happening on the earth, Peter. Denial of evidence noted. The idea that CO2 levels on Earth can effect the solar cycle is laughable in the extreme, however, the inverse is a distinct, and unpalatable possibility to the green lobby. Jeff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mystery of the Missing Sunspots, Solved? | Quadibloc | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | July 2nd 09 07:40 AM |
Mystery of the Missing Sunspots, Solved? | Geode | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | June 30th 09 02:32 AM |
Mystery of the Missing Sunspots, Solved? | Meme Mr. Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | June 20th 09 08:14 AM |
they are packing over fixed, till absent, beside apparent privatisations | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 14th 07 12:59 PM |
Sunspots | Norman Silverstone | UK Astronomy | 2 | July 1st 04 06:51 PM |