#1
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not
physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. Now just observer(you) in space. Imagine one moon at distance of 390,000 km straight before your eyes(horizone moon) and second moon at distance of 384,000 km above (overhead moon). As moon illusion is psychological, 'horizone moon' should look larger than 'overhead moon'. On same logic, any distant object in space should look larger than closer object. Please point out any mistake. Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
In sci.physics Rama wrote:
1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. Now just observer(you) in space. Imagine one moon at distance of 390,000 km straight before your eyes(horizone moon) and second moon at distance of 384,000 km above (overhead moon). As moon illusion is psychological, 'horizone moon' should look larger than 'overhead moon'. On same logic, any distant object in space should look larger than closer object. Please point out any mistake. Not taking, or perhaps sleeping through, high school trigonometry. The diameter of the moon is roughly 3,500 km. The difference in the subtended angle at the two distances is about 0.008 degrees, below the resolution of the eye. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
"Rama" wrote in message ... | 1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not | physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. | 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead | moon. This variation in distance is physical. By one Earth radius, and anyway the moon appears larger near the horizon than overhead. It should appear smaller, therefore the effect is psychological. The reason it appears larger is the background, the effect is in photographs, too. | So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself | is removed. Now just observer(you) in space. Imagine one moon at | distance of 390,000 km straight before your eyes(horizone moon) and | second moon at distance of 384,000 km above (overhead moon). | | As moon illusion is psychological, 'horizone moon' should look larger | than 'overhead moon'. | It does. shrug | On same logic, any distant object in space should look larger than | closer object. | | Please point out any mistake. | The moon only seems larger when compared to trees, houses, objects that are on the ground. By looking through a tube to hide them the effect goes away. Holding your thumb up (or a coin) at arms length to obscure the moon will quickly show you the size is the same on the horizon or overhead. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
On 3/23/11 7:15 PM, Rama wrote:
1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. Background on Moon Illusion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_illusion |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
Rama wrote:
1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. No. The illusion is caused by the proximity to the horizon. -- pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
Rama wrote:
[...] The illusion that the moon is larger when near the horizon than when overhead is due to humans applying their general expectation about the size of objects in the sky to a situation in which those expectations are wrong. Birds of a given size look smaller near the horizon than when overhead, simply because they are farther away; since the moon appears the same size in both locations [#], we INTERPRET this as it being bigger near the horizon. [#] Instruments that measure its angular spread show unambiguously that the image of the moon has the same angular spread in any given night. Tom Roberts |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
On Mar 23, 5:15*pm, Rama wrote:
1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. Now just observer(you) in space. Imagine one moon at distance of 390,000 km straight before your eyes(horizone moon) and second moon at distance of 384,000 km above (overhead moon). As moon illusion is psychological, 'horizone moon' should look larger than 'overhead moon'. On same logic, any distant object in space should look larger than closer object. Please point out any mistake. Thanks! The moon illusion works for more than just the moon, it works for entire constellations. Orion rising or setting is huge, but it appears to be much smaller (to my eye) when it is culminating, and the same can be said for other constellations that get high enough in the sky... in other words, Grus doesn't change apparent size at all for me. \Paul A |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
pete wrote:
Rama wrote: 1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. No. The illusion is caused by the proximity to the horizon. But that is still a psychological effect, Sam. To get the Moon illusion, you need to be on a planet (Earth) so that you have a horizon* and an illusion (probably something "hard-wired" in the visual system) that the Moon looks larger on the horizon than higher in the sky. *Question (that may never have been asked but should be tested): Do astronauts on the ISS have an impression that the full Moon is larger when seen "rising" or "setting" than at other times? They are in free-fall (zero-g) but Earth gives them a horizon of sorts. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
Mike Dworetsky wrote: pete wrote: Rama wrote: 1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. No. The illusion is caused by the proximity to the horizon. But that is still a psychological effect, Sam. To get the Moon illusion, you need to be on a planet (Earth) so that you have a horizon* and an illusion (probably something "hard-wired" in the visual system) that the Moon looks larger on the horizon than higher in the sky. *Question (that may never have been asked but should be tested): Do astronauts on the ISS have an impression that the full Moon is larger when seen "rising" or "setting" than at other times? They are in free-fall (zero-g) but Earth gives them a horizon of sorts. Some people had asked this question to Astronaut Paolo in ISS. He replied to ESA and europeanspaceagency posted his reply on this page. Please scroll for 'europeanspaceagency' http://flickr.com/photos/magisstra/5372739290/ His answer is not clear. He said that he has not done 'experiment' and kept talking about squashed moon. Further follow-up was futile. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Moon illusion
palsing wrote: On Mar 23, 5:15*pm, Rama wrote: 1. It is said that moon illusion is psychological perception, not physical i.e it got nothing to do with atmospheric refraction. 2. The horizone full moon is at farther distance compared to overhead moon. This variation in distance is physical. So as moon illusion is psychological, it should work if earth itself is removed. Now just observer(you) in space. Imagine one moon at distance of 390,000 km straight before your eyes(horizone moon) and second moon at distance of 384,000 km above (overhead moon). As moon illusion is psychological, 'horizone moon' should look larger than 'overhead moon'. On same logic, any distant object in space should look larger than closer object. Please point out any mistake. Thanks! The moon illusion works for more than just the moon, it works for entire constellations. Orion rising or setting is huge, but it appears to be much smaller (to my eye) when it is culminating, and the same can be said for other constellations that get high enough in the sky... in other words, Grus doesn't change apparent size at all for me. Doesn't it mean that sky (space) at horizone is magnified like coin in water is magnified? Reason may be anything, most probably atmospheric refraction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
you may like the "moon illusion"... | boson boss | Astronomy Misc | 2 | June 28th 07 07:41 PM |
Optical illusion concerning more than one moon | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | May 21st 07 11:10 AM |
moon illusion hype | dave black | UK Astronomy | 5 | June 24th 05 06:58 PM |
Summer Moon Illusion | nightbat | Misc | 3 | June 22nd 05 12:58 PM |
Definitive moon size illusion experiment | Mark Elkington | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | July 9th 04 10:50 PM |