|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 21st 07, 06:58 PM
posted to sci.math,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,comp.ai.philosophy
|
|||
|
|||
Some troubling assumptions of SR
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:23:52 -0500, David Marcus
wrote: Bob Kolker wrote: David Marcus wrote: If we have a frame that is moving with speed v relative to space, what will be the speed of light in this frame (assuming the light is moving in the same direction the frame is)? What does "relative to space" mean? Don't ask me. Lester is the one that said it. Velocities as determined by Michelson-Morley or some variant. ~v~~ 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Some troubling assumptions of SR | Lester Zick | Astronomy Misc | 582 | March 25th 07 07:48 PM |
| Some troubling assumptions of SR | Lester Zick | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 9th 07 12:23 AM |
| Some troubling assumptions of SR | Lester Zick | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 8th 07 11:26 PM |
| Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 5 | November 29th 05 03:15 PM |
| Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 5 | November 29th 05 03:15 PM |
Linear Mode
