|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Good Spectrographic Results from the NEO Whitely Catalog
On Aug 18, 7:07*pm, American wrote:
On Aug 18, 6:00*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Toilets are FOR ****! More yours than mine. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:19:29 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 4:55*pm, Saul Levy wrote: I did it for you. This data should NOT BE POSTED HERE. *The original source should be given and anyone interested can look there. You're as bad as ED DUMBER THAN ELEPHANT ****. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 1:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Could you CUT THIS **** DOWN next time? Saul Levy That only works in your perfect world of automatic conjecture, which in your case, doesn't ever achieve the desired result of personal satisfaction, albeit I am quite entertained by your relentless disconnect with the real issues of the day being just ELEPHANT s**t. Go resize your toilet - I think your brains just fell inside... he he he A new, clean bowl with fresh water in it makes a fine Saul-skull, as far as I'm concerned!!! No, Usenet is not a toilet - it's just the rhetoricizers like Saul-skulls that make it all the more hilarious!!! STOP CLOUDING THE TOILETBOWL!!! I purposefully posted the data to point out the absurdity by being absurd - it's called "the theatre of the absurd", so please don't dissent towards your own newsgroup!!! (Maybe you should try looking elsewhere for your own "jollies" and starting another newsgroup, e.g. alt.puff.waterpipes or alt.society.lobotomy he he he he... * * ...get over it.... American "He has to part his hair with an axe" I have created a link to an asteroid mining page he http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining.htm This represents a general treatment of asteroids, with regard to minerology and spectral reflectivity, emissivity, etc., and was written at a time that these values were easily available in the national online databases. Today it would seem that the data is a bit cryptic, as I'm not sure that there is any one program where the values given for the different filters and settings could automatically output a given transmissibility, or even reflectivity. The focus of my interest is on the NEA metallic asteroids, and I will offer to exchange some important information about SAR mapping if someone could offer me how to interpret the data given for the NEO's in the Whitely catalog, as previously mentioned. The link for the Whitely catalog is: http://starbrite.jpl.nasa.gov/pds/vi...ELEY-PHOT-V1.0 Thanks, American "A genius can do almost anything except make a living." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Spectral Reflectances of Platinum Pulled from Older Database
On Aug 19, 11:09*am, American wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:07*pm, American wrote: On Aug 18, 6:00*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Toilets are FOR ****! More yours than mine. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:19:29 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 4:55*pm, Saul Levy wrote: I did it for you. This data should NOT BE POSTED HERE. *The original source should be given and anyone interested can look there. You're as bad as ED DUMBER THAN ELEPHANT ****. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 1:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Could you CUT THIS **** DOWN next time? Saul Levy That only works in your perfect world of automatic conjecture, which in your case, doesn't ever achieve the desired result of personal satisfaction, albeit I am quite entertained by your relentless disconnect with the real issues of the day being just ELEPHANT s**t. Go resize your toilet - I think your brains just fell inside... he he he A new, clean bowl with fresh water in it makes a fine Saul-skull, as far as I'm concerned!!! No, Usenet is not a toilet - it's just the rhetoricizers like Saul-skulls that make it all the more hilarious!!! STOP CLOUDING THE TOILETBOWL!!! I purposefully posted the data to point out the absurdity by being absurd - it's called "the theatre of the absurd", so please don't dissent towards your own newsgroup!!! (Maybe you should try looking elsewhere for your own "jollies" and starting another newsgroup, e.g. alt.puff.waterpipes or alt.society.lobotomy he he he he... * * ...get over it.... American "He has to part his hair with an axe" I have created a link to an asteroid mining page he http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining.htm This represents a general treatment of asteroids, with regard to minerology and spectral reflectivity, emissivity, etc., and was written at a time that these values were easily available in the national online databases. Today it would seem that the data is a bit cryptic, as I'm not sure that there is any one program where the values given for the different filters and settings could automatically output a given transmissibility, or even reflectivity. The focus of my interest is on the NEA metallic asteroids, and I will offer to exchange some important information about SAR mapping if someone could offer me how to interpret the data given for the NEO's in the Whitely catalog, as previously mentioned. The link for the Whitely catalog is: http://starbrite.jpl.nasa.gov/pds/vi...EAR-A-I0034-3-.... Thanks, American "A genius can do almost anything except make a living." O.K., Saul Levy, I've shortened the post!!! Here is a copy of an older spectral database that dates back to 1998. The reflectances should still be the same, so I have created a series of charts from the data by copying and pasting with MS paint, in order to shorten the sifting process. See reference [1] for each of the four asteroids in question. The chart on the right side in the middle of the page shows a list for all of the asteroids that were photographed. There are perhaps 50 or so asteroids per chart, but only one data point on the entire list has been circled in red. This is the asteroid in question. The asteroids number is on the left side of the group, and the column # is listed across the top of the page. The reason there are 15 columns is because there are 15 different reflectances given per asteroid, according to some wavelength, with a margin of error, usually around 3% - 10%. In particular, look at columns 12, 13, and 14 for the reflectance of interest: the platinum and gold wavelength for reflectances lie in the 0.670 - 0.730 range[1] for each asteroids in question. This is where I have circled the number in red. As one can see, the numbers are there to support my contention that they MIGHT BE metal-rich asteroids, due to the value of reflectance given to them. Out of all of the asteroids listed in the 24-color spectrophotometry data list, 4 asteroids, #262 has a reflectivity of 0.77, #660 has a reflectivity of 0.71, #1019 has a reflectivity of 0.77, and #1646 has a reflectivity of 0.79. Based upon the reflectance of "pure platinum", only one asteroid, #660, has a reflectivity in the range of interest. The others (#262, #1019, and #1646), all have "close" values, which may have something to do with either the uncertainties (~1%-3%) or the purity of Pt concentrates in the regolith itself. Some details on the asteroids are as follows: #262 Valda is a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars) http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;cad=0# orb # 660 Crescentia is also a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars) http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;c ad=0#orb #1019 Strackea is an inner main belt asteroid (NEA just outside Mars) http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;ca d=0#orb #1646 Rosseland is a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars): http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;c ad=0#orb At closest approach, #262 Valda is ~2X distance from Mars to earth. At closest approach, # 660 Crescentia is 2X(+) distance from " ". At closest approach, #1019 Strackea is about 2X distance " ". At closest approach, #1646 Rosseland is about 2X(+) distance " ". And then my favorite, the platinum asteroid, Amun: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...og=0;cad=0#orb Amun makes an NEO approach in 2011, and many times thereafter... American [1] http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining1.htm http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining2.htm http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining3.htm http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining4.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Spectral Reflectances of Platinum Pulled from Older Database
On Aug 19, 11:09*am, American wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:07*pm, American wrote: On Aug 18, 6:00*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Toilets are FOR ****! More yours than mine. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:19:29 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 4:55*pm, Saul Levy wrote: I did it for you. This data should NOT BE POSTED HERE. *The original source should be given and anyone interested can look there. You're as bad as ED DUMBER THAN ELEPHANT ****. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 1:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Could you CUT THIS **** DOWN next time? Saul Levy That only works in your perfect world of automatic conjecture, which in your case, doesn't ever achieve the desired result of personal satisfaction, albeit I am quite entertained by your relentless disconnect with the real issues of the day being just ELEPHANT s**t. Go resize your toilet - I think your brains just fell inside... he he he A new, clean bowl with fresh water in it makes a fine Saul-skull, as far as I'm concerned!!! No, Usenet is not a toilet - it's just the rhetoricizers like Saul-skulls that make it all the more hilarious!!! STOP CLOUDING THE TOILETBOWL!!! I purposefully posted the data to point out the absurdity by being absurd - it's called "the theatre of the absurd", so please don't dissent towards your own newsgroup!!! (Maybe you should try looking elsewhere for your own "jollies" and starting another newsgroup, e.g. alt.puff.waterpipes or alt.society.lobotomy he he he he... * * ...get over it.... American "He has to part his hair with an axe" I have created a link to an asteroid mining page he http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining.htm This represents a general treatment of asteroids, with regard to minerology and spectral reflectivity, emissivity, etc., and was written at a time that these values were easily available in the national online databases. Today it would seem that the data is a bit cryptic, as I'm not sure that there is any one program where the values given for the different filters and settings could automatically output a given transmissibility, or even reflectivity. The focus of my interest is on the NEA metallic asteroids, and I will offer to exchange some important information about SAR mapping if someone could offer me how to interpret the data given for the NEO's in the Whitely catalog, as previously mentioned. The link for the Whitely catalog is: http://starbrite.jpl.nasa.gov/pds/vi...EAR-A-I0034-3-.... Thanks, American "A genius can do almost anything except make a living." (This is a repost) O.K., Saul Levy, I've shortened the post!!! Here is a copy of an older spectral database that dates back to 1998. The reflectances should still be the same, so I have created a series of charts from the data by copying and pasting with MS paint, in order to shorten the sifting process. See reference [1] for each of the four asteroids in question. The chart on the right side in the middle of the page shows a list for all of the asteroids that were photographed. There are perhaps 50 or so asteroids per chart, but only one data point on the entire list has been circled in red. This is the asteroid in question. The asteroids number is on the left side of the group, and the column # is listed across the top of the page. The reason there are 15 columns is because there are 15 different reflectances given per asteroid, according to some wavelength, with a margin of error, usually around 3% - 10%. In particular, look at columns 12, 13, and 14 for the reflectance of interest: the platinum and gold wavelength for reflectances lie in the 0.670 - 0.730 range[1] for each asteroids in question. This is where I have circled the number in red. As one can see, the numbers are there to support my contention that they MIGHT BE metal-rich asteroids, due to the value of reflectance given to them. Out of all of the asteroids listed in the 24-color spectrophotometry data list, 4 asteroids, #262 has a reflectivity of 0.77, #660 has a reflectivity of 0.71, #1019 has a reflectivity of 0.77, and #1646 has a reflectivity of 0.79. Based upon the reflectance of "pure platinum", only one asteroid, #660, has a reflectivity in the range of interest. The others (#262, #1019, and #1646), all have "close" values, which may have something to do with either the uncertainties (~1%-3%) or the purity of Pt concentrates in the regolith itself. Some details on the asteroids are as follows: #262 Valda is a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars) http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;cad=0# orb # 660 Crescentia is also a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars) http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;c ad=0#orb #1019 Strackea is an inner main belt asteroid (NEA just outside Mars) http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;ca d=0#orb #1646 Rosseland is a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars): http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...=0;c ad=0#orb At closest approach, #262 Valda is ~2X distance from Mars to earth. At closest approach, # 660 Crescentia is 2X(+) distance from " ". At closest approach, #1019 Strackea is about 2X distance " ". At closest approach, #1646 Rosseland is about 2X(+) distance " ". And then my favorite, the platinum asteroid, Amun: http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...og=0;cad=0#orb Amun makes an NEO approach in 2011, and many times thereafter... American [1] http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining1a.htm http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining2a.htm http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining3a.htm http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining4a.htm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Review of Mining the Sky and Other Curious Distractions
On Aug 20, 9:44*pm, American wrote:
On Aug 19, 11:09*am, American wrote: On Aug 18, 7:07*pm, American wrote: On Aug 18, 6:00*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Toilets are FOR ****! More yours than mine. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:19:29 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 4:55*pm, Saul Levy wrote: I did it for you. This data should NOT BE POSTED HERE. *The original source should be given and anyone interested can look there. You're as bad as ED DUMBER THAN ELEPHANT ****. Saul Levy On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT), American wrote: On Aug 18, 1:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote: Could you CUT THIS **** DOWN next time? Saul Levy That only works in your perfect world of automatic conjecture, which in your case, doesn't ever achieve the desired result of personal satisfaction, albeit I am quite entertained by your relentless disconnect with the real issues of the day being just ELEPHANT s**t. Go resize your toilet - I think your brains just fell inside... he he he A new, clean bowl with fresh water in it makes a fine Saul-skull, as far as I'm concerned!!! No, Usenet is not a toilet - it's just the rhetoricizers like Saul-skulls that make it all the more hilarious!!! STOP CLOUDING THE TOILETBOWL!!! I purposefully posted the data to point out the absurdity by being absurd - it's called "the theatre of the absurd", so please don't dissent towards your own newsgroup!!! (Maybe you should try looking elsewhere for your own "jollies" and starting another newsgroup, e.g. alt.puff.waterpipes or alt.society.lobotomy he he he he... * * ...get over it.... American "He has to part his hair with an axe" I have created a link to an asteroid mining page he http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining.htm This represents a general treatment of asteroids, with regard to minerology and spectral reflectivity, emissivity, etc., and was written at a time that these values were easily available in the national online databases. Today it would seem that the data is a bit cryptic, as I'm not sure that there is any one program where the values given for the different filters and settings could automatically output a given transmissibility, or even reflectivity. The focus of my interest is on the NEA metallic asteroids, and I will offer to exchange some important information about SAR mapping if someone could offer me how to interpret the data given for the NEO's in the Whitely catalog, as previously mentioned. The link for the Whitely catalog is: http://starbrite.jpl.nasa.gov/pds/vi...EAR-A-I0034-3-.... Thanks, American "A genius can do almost anything except make a living." (This is a repost) O.K., Saul Levy, I've shortened the post!!! Here is a copy of an older spectral database that dates back to 1998. The reflectances should still be the same, so I have created a series of charts from the data by copying and pasting with MS paint, in order to shorten the sifting process. See reference [1] for each of the four asteroids in question. The chart on the right side in the middle of the page shows a list for all of the asteroids that were photographed. There are perhaps 50 or so asteroids per chart, but only one data point on the entire list has been circled in red. This is the asteroid in question. The asteroids number is on the left side of the group, and the column # is listed across the top of the page. The reason there are 15 columns is because there are 15 different reflectances given per asteroid, according to some wavelength, with a margin of error, usually around 3% - 10%. In particular, look at columns 12, 13, and 14 for the reflectance of interest: the platinum and gold wavelength for reflectances lie in the 0.670 - 0.730 range[1] for each asteroids in question. This is where I have circled the number in red. As one can see, the numbers are there to support my contention that they MIGHT BE metal-rich asteroids, due to the value of reflectance given to them. Out of all of the asteroids listed in the 24-color spectrophotometry data list, 4 asteroids, #262 has a reflectivity of 0.77, #660 has a reflectivity of 0.71, #1019 has a reflectivity of 0.77, and #1646 has a reflectivity of 0.79. Based upon the reflectance of "pure platinum", only one asteroid, #660, has a reflectivity in the range of interest. The others (#262, #1019, and #1646), all have "close" values, which may have something to do with either the uncertainties (~1%-3%) or the purity of Pt concentrates in the regolith itself. Some details on the asteroids are as follows: #262 Valda is a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars)http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...;cov=0;log=0;c... # 660 Crescentia is also a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars)http://ssd..jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?ss...orb=1;cov=0;lo... #1019 Strackea is an inner main belt asteroid (NEA just outside Mars)http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...rb=1;cov=0;log... #1646 Rosseland is a main belt asteroid (NEA beyond Mars):http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...orb=1;cov=0;lo... At closest approach, #262 Valda is ~2X distance from Mars to earth. At closest approach, # 660 Crescentia is 2X(+) distance from " ". At closest approach, #1019 Strackea is about 2X distance " ". At closest approach, #1646 Rosseland is about 2X(+) distance " ". And then my favorite, the platinum asteroid, Amun:http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sst...og=0;cad=0#orb Amun makes an NEO approach in 2011, and many times thereafter... American [1] http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_rans...m/mining4a.htm "The vast economic potential of asteroids and other extraterrestrial bodies is the subject of Mining the Sky. John S. Lewis, co-director of the NASA/University of Arizona Space Engineering Research Center, argues that the payoff from space exploration will be bigger than virtually anyone has recognized. Much bigger. Consider: The asteroid belt contains an estimated 825 quintillion (a billion times a billion) tons of iron--enough to build shells around planets, gigantic cities in space, and starships carrying entire civilizations. How much is this iron worth? Lewis performs a fanciful calculation: At present prices of around $50 a ton, the asteroids yield $7 billion of the metal per person for everyone alive today, or an affluent standard of living for a population far larger. Moreover, iron is merely one element found in the Main Belt, which also contains gold, silver, copper, manganese, titanium, uranium, and much else. Nor does the Main Belt have a monopoly on space's potential riches. Mining the Sky ranges broadly across the solar system, finding technological and economic possibilities all the way from the moon and "near-Earth" asteroids to the distant orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Lewis sometimes blurs the distinction between near-term technologies and distant or improbable ones, an effect that is intensified by the book's fictional vignettes about asteroid miners and other colorful characters. Nonetheless, Mining the Sky succeeds in conveying a sense that space is anything but an empty, unimprovable wasteland. . . . Eventually, Mars, the asteroids, and the rest of the solar system may have been explored and settled. What then? Mining the Sky ends with a call for humanity to expand throughout the entire galaxy, creating a population of countless quintillions; Lewis's sheer maximalism may discomfit even some space enthusiasts." - Kenneth Silber John E. Lewis was the Codirector, NASA, U. of Arizona Space Engineering Research Center. How much influence do people like John S. Lewis have, as Commissioner of the Arizona State Space Commission, with the way that Kitt Peak Observatory provides access to their findings? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_S._Lewis Lewis' web page: http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/people/faculty/lewis2.html My guess is probably moreso with Kitt Peak, rather than the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility in Mauna Kea, HI. The HI facility is the one where the Whitely catalog has acquired the 8-filter option under cryptic, if not impossible to extract, information, on not only the reflectances, but also the minerology, of a much vaster magnitude of both NEA's and main belt asteroids. American "The chief end of men uniting into commonwealth and sub- mission unto government is for the preservation of property." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
looking for good but simple near-space catalog | Lucy | UK Astronomy | 1 | April 23rd 04 08:39 AM |
looking for good but simple near-space catalog | Lucy | UK Astronomy | 5 | April 22nd 04 09:21 PM |
looking for good but simple near-space catalog | Lucy | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 22nd 04 02:38 PM |
looking for good but simple near-space catalog | Lucy | Misc | 1 | April 22nd 04 02:16 PM |
Finally, some good results | WayneH | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | September 2nd 03 08:12 PM |