Summary of my article from the 1992 to 24 Nov 2009

I updated the previous summary of my articles
from the year 1992 to 24 Nov 2009.

I did not change the ASCII text file's name.

I put all these articles together in the summary
which can be found from my Home Page:

http://www.student.oulu.fi/~haporopu/

Please take a look (very long, more than 1500 pages).

Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

On Mar 3, 3:05*am, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
I updated the previous summary of my articles
from the year 1992 to 24 Nov 2009.

I did not change the ASCII text file's name.

How come you didn't correct the ****ed up formatting?


I put all these articles together in the summary
which can be found from my Home Page:

http://www.student.oulu.fi/~haporopu/

Please take a look (very long, more than 1500 pages).

No ****ing way.


Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

On Mar 3, 9:05*am, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
I updated the previous summary of my articles
from the year 1992 to 24 Nov 2009.

I did not change the ASCII text file's name.

I put all these articles together in the summary
which can be found from my Home Page:

http://www.student.oulu.fi/~haporopu/

Please take a look (very long, more than 1500 pages).

Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

Nobody will plough through that mess, even if it contained all the
secrets of the Universe - Half of it is gobbledegook headers, and
most of the rest is "dot and carry one" broken line formatting.

But, just out of interest, did you extract that lot automatically
with a search? If so, how and from where? I thought Google Groups
was utterly broken when it comes to searches - a good reason not
to let them keep their grubby mitts on that book scanning project
until they fix their usenet archive IMHO.

(Sure enough, I read the other day that for 18th century books
with fold out plates, the minimum wage mongs doing the scanning
aren't bothering to scan the plates. So Google are busy messing
up that project too.)


Cheers

John R Ramsden

OwlHoot writes:

(Sure enough, I read the other day that for 18th century books with
fold out plates, the minimum wage mongs doing the scanning aren't
bothering to scan the plates. So Google are busy messing up that
project too.)

Was this use of "mongs" intentional?

--
Aatu Koskensilta )

"Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

On Mar 4, 12:49*am, OwlHoot wrote:
On Mar 3, 9:05*am, Hannu Poropudas wrote:

I updated the previous summary of my articles
from the year 1992 to 24 Nov 2009.

I did not change the ASCII text file's name.

I put all these articles together in the summary
which can be found from my Home Page:

http://www.student.oulu.fi/~haporopu/

Please take a look (very long, more than 1500 pages).

Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

Nobody will plough through that mess, even if it contained all the
secrets of the Universe - Half of it is gobbledegook headers, and
most of the rest is "dot and carry one" broken line formatting.


I'am very sorry about this inconvenience.

I made this summary with busy and articles that it
contains are copied mostly directly from the net.

It is impossible for me to try to edit these about more
than 1500 ASCII txt pages.

I tried to copy my articles with Message-ID and this caused
additional ASCII marks in my articles.

My point is to use this large ASCII text file as a data source
for new physics and new knowledge about the Universe.

Hannu

But, just out of interest, did you extract that lot automatically
with a search? If so, how and from where? I thought Google Groups
was utterly broken when it comes to searches - a good reason not
to let them keep their grubby mitts on that book scanning project
until they fix their usenet archive IMHO.

(Sure enough, I read the other day that for 18th century books
with fold out plates, the minimum wage mongs doing the scanning
aren't bothering to scan the plates. So Google are busy messing
up that project too.)

Cheers

John R Ramsden