|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Moon Hoax morons soon to be foiled by LRO images of US and SOVIETmissions
On Apr 25, 11:10 pm, J Waggoner wrote:
Frankly if you want to embarrass yourself go ahead. The Chinese certainly haven't come out and said we didn't land either. and in 1968 BEFORE Nixon visited were supporting the North Vietnamese.... So are you saying NASA duped Mao Tse Dung and Leonid Breshnev ? AND ANSWER THAT QUESTION DON"T AVOID IT ) On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:46:51 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth wrote: On Mar 22, 10:17 pm, J Waggoner wrote: When the Lunar Reconnaisance orbiter takes off for lunar orbit this fall, some landing site images will be available if not all of all probes and landing sites of Apollo spacecraft and Soviet expeditions. This could well include the fabled SIV stages and their smashed remnants. Either way Tranquility base, to Hadley Rille will be on display and the Lunokod and surveyor missions too.! We all know that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked but for the open minded, the more evidence the merrier.... On the LRO camera-sweep agenda are trips down memory lane too, said Mark Robinson of Northwestern University's Center for Planetary Sciences in Evanston, Illinois. He is Principal Investigator for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC). Take note. For you "Apollo landings were a hoax" believers LROC's sightseeing abilities should set the record straight. Image Gallery: NASA's New Spaceship VIDEO: A New Era of Space Exploration Video animation of how NASA plans to get back to the Moon by 2018. LROC is to image U.S. and Soviet landing sites on the Moon. That includes NASA's Ranger and Surveyor lunar probes, as well as the touch down spots of Apollo expeditionary crews and the impact sites of spent Saturn rocket stages that hurled astronauts moonward. Also on the LROC see list are the Soviet Union's Lunakhod automated rovers, Robinson told SPACE.com. "We will image the Apollo sites and you will see the descent stages sitting on the surface," Robinson said. LROC will clearly see the overall shape of that landing hardware, but won't be able to resolve such things as the insignia on the side of the descent stage, or see the stripes on astronaut-planted flags, he said. Additionally, Robinson noted, given a setting Sun in the lunar sky, LROC should spot the long shadow of descent stages cast across the Moon's crater-pocked terrain. Heading "Down Memory Lane" Source link:http://www.space.com/businesstechnol...echnology.html Mythbusters should also check this one out. Now we're being so kindly informed once again, and this time by the warm and fuzzy plus otherwise wizardly likes of Eric Chomko, as well as from the full swarm like support of all else that's Borg like pro- NASA, that of whatever albedo is actually dependent upon the viewing distance, and even as much as not hardly worth mentioning as having to do with the angle of solar illumination. Phobos in color and 3D http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s..._frm/thread/ea... Apparently, even sunrise or sunset angles of local illumination for Eric Chomko only increases the reflective nature of a given surface that's otherwise on average nearly coal like, especially of those pesky off-world kinds of places that simply don't have to play by those pesky regular laws of physics, and to make things a whole lot worse, is if using a polarized optical element gives the local terrain of our moon yet another minimum boost of 2:1 or greater albedo. No wonder that NASA/Apollo moon looked so EVA locally reflective, as though exactly like a certain 0.65~0.75 albedo worth of a guano island, as well as for why those various colors of known items looked exactly as though having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated. I don't want others to think that I'm nearly as smart as Eric Chomko, although actual terrestrial coal seems smarter than Eric, not to mention corporate Kodak or any other commercial film supplier. Of course, we all know that not one outside living soul (meaning other than dominated by and/or in debt to NASA/Apollo) has ever set their naked eye or much less of any perfectly failsafe (meaning zero harm) digital scanner upon any one of all those thousands of NASA/Apollo mission related Kodak moments. If some of us didn't know better, you'd think our NASA and of those having "the right stuff" were trying really hard to hide something. . - Brad Guth It takes two to tango, although the more the better. Are you actually going to suggest that our cold-war wasn't mutually orchestrated, and thus wasn't perpetrated for government job security and the profits taken by those playing along? .. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MOON LANDING HOAX RELIGIOUS "later that it was all a hoax" | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 7th 05 01:38 AM |