Treating space-time like a super-fluid may unify physics

Treating space-time like a fluid may unify physics | Science! | Geek.com
http://www.geek.com/science/treating...ysics-1597276/

"Ever since Einstein’s theory of gravity was confirmed experimentally,
the defining quest in all of physics has been to overturn it. See,
evidence for Einstein’s relativity was problematic because, while
seemingly irrefutable, it contradicts the equally well supported
findings of another branch of physics: quantum physics, which is the
only current framework for understanding physics at the subatomic scale."

"It’s basically a way of exploding general relativity, of exposing it as
a literally shallow understanding of the universe. Just as relativity
claimed to get at the actual principles that underlie Newton’s
experimentally derived theory of gravity, this idea would expose
Einstein’s relativity as merely a good-enough metaphor for reality."

On Friday, June 20, 2014 7:35:53 AM UTC-7, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Treating space-time like a fluid may unify physics | Science! | Geek.com

http://www.geek.com/science/treating...ysics-1597276/



"Ever since Einstein�s theory of gravity was confirmed experimentally,

the defining quest in all of physics has been to overturn it. See,

evidence for Einstein�s relativity was problematic because, while

seemingly irrefutable, it contradicts the equally well supported

findings of another branch of physics: quantum physics, which is the

only current framework for understanding physics at the subatomic scale."



"It�s basically a way of exploding general relativity, of exposing it as

a literally shallow understanding of the universe. Just as relativity

claimed to get at the actual principles that underlie Newton�s

experimentally derived theory of gravity, this idea would expose

Einstein�s relativity as merely a good-enough metaphor for reality."

Indeed, aether/dark-matter can be the quantum fluid that ordinary molecular mass displaces, and conducts photons at the very slow speed of 'c'.

Quantum mechanics depends entirely upon photons as always moving but strictly limited to 'c'.

Entanglement kind of proves that the individual photon as a wavy-particle doesn't actually have to move, if at all.

Prof Marc Kamionkowski:
"We're going to need confirmation by independent groups. That's the way things work in science. We don't believe things because somebody says they're true; we believe them because different people make the measurements independently and find the same results."

PRE Style='White-Space: PRE !important; Font-Size: 18px !important;Font-Family: monospace !important;'Â*
Some people wish:
Treating space-time like a fluid [would] unify physics

Not true.

Quantum Mechanics deals with lots of unknowns;
in contrast, General Relativitity is infinitely precise.

"eXergy" ( energy that can do work ), is what binds them.
Gravitational exergy is equal and opposite to all other forms of eXergy.

The battle for the exergy prize is between:

· The carbon dioxide breathers ( Algae and Plants ).

· The oxygen breathers ( Fungi and Animals ).

Algae and Plants are siblings.
Fungi and Animals are siblings of a different parent.

Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide won't stop rising unless·and·until
Algae and Plants beat·back Fungi and Animals.

http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Einstein.HTM
http://Jeff-Relf.Me/The_Cosmic_Horizon_.HTM