|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
A while ago I saw an idea for an "Airship To Space" on JP Aerospace's website.
How does this work? They mentioned using electric rockets which have very low thrust. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
In article ,
ChrisV01 wrote: A while ago I saw an idea for an "Airship To Space" on JP Aerospace's website. How does this work? They mentioned using electric rockets which have very low thrust. Nobody outside JPA has been able to figure out how it could possibly work; the numbers do not add up. (Or rather, they add up to "absolutely no way".) Either they have some *very* subtle trick in mind, or they've goofed badly, and currently the betting is on the latter. It doesn't help that very little technical detail on their scheme is available. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
How does this work? They mentioned using electric rockets which have very
low thrust. You asked how ATO, Airship To Orbit, would work and all they said was that since they don't know how it would work, it probably wouldn't. Ah, the conceit of pessimism. It, not the shallow gravity well, is what keeps us stuck on the ground. How it works: The launcher station floats very high where the air is 1% as thick as at the ground. An V-shaped orbiter airship a mile long is assembled on station. This orbiter uses its own positive buoyancy to float upward to 40 milles high where the air is even less dense and which is halfway to a lower LEO. Then electric ion propulsion is used to accelerate the giant airship forward and up. [JPA is looking at standard Hall thrusters as well as proprietary ion thrusters.] The orbiter's angle of attack is upward so the thin air compresses under the Vee-shaped ship and raises its altitude. The higher it goes, the thinner the air and the less the drag and the faster it goes. Repeat until orbit is reached. This is not rocket science, it is high altitude aerodynamics. ^ //^\\ ~~~ near space elevator ~~~~ ~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
In article ,
Allen Meece wrote: The orbiter's angle of attack is upward so the thin air compresses under the Vee-shaped ship and raises its altitude. The higher it goes, the thinner the air and the less the drag and the faster it goes. Repeat until orbit is reached. This is not rocket science, it is high altitude aerodynamics. Yes, and we know how high-altitude aerodynamics works, and it's not good enough. When you start looking at numbers, not just handwaving about "the less the drag", they appear to need a positively miraculous L/D ratio to make this thing work as described, and there's no hint of how they could possibly do that. It remains possible that they have some clever trick in mind. But "you just kinda float up and then start accelerating slowly" is nowhere near clever enough. -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
(Tony Rusi) :
(ChrisV01) wrote in message ... A while ago I saw an idea for an "Airship To Space" on JP Aerospace's website. How does this work? They mentioned using electric rockets which have very low thrust. I know that the space station feels around 3 lbs of drag in its normal orbital range between 150 and 250 miles altitude where the atmospheric density is about 3 to 6 billionths of STP at MSL. I also know that many people are proposing electrodynamic tethers to reboost spacestations powered by mutiple 10 kilowatt lasers from the ground. So why couldn't JP aerospace be using some form of electrodynamic tethers powered by lasers on the ground to dynamically lift themselves higher to get into space from whatever altitude they can muster from bouyancy alone? I would love it if someone like Henry Spencer could run the numbers and show his work on this idea. Because until it is at near orbital speeds already the tether can not be deployed. The end of the tether must be already moving above orbital speeds to pull up the rest of the tether. Tethers are useful to maintain or boost objects in orbit already. -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
So thin enough that the kinetic energy of the gas striking the ship,
which would be traveling upwards of several kilometers per second, doesn't exceed the melting point of the very fragile hull? Just curious. It's well known that it is the compression of the incident air that heats it. This puffball of a spacecraft won't compress the air enough for high temperatures like a metal ship would. ^ //^\\ ~~~ near space elevator ~~~~ ~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Air Ship To Space?
they [JPA] appear to need a positively miraculous L/D ratio to
make this thing work as described, and there's no hint of how they could possibly do that. Correct about the no hint. They just say the "ion engine for the orbiter will be tested in the next five months." There are a few different types of ion engines. There is a concept that ionizes the slipstream and magnetically propels it rearward so the airship "swims" through the air. Heard of that one? I think it might be the "proprietary ion engine" which Skystation initially intended to use but had to abandon and go to solar electric propellers. ? In other words, there is more than one way to skin an orbit. Let's get behind JPA and wish them success. So what if they can't or won't right now tell us how to make an ATO, Airship To Orbit. It will be an affordable and wonderful thing to slowly accelerate to orbit. Space will become closer to all of us when this concept flies. ^ //^\\ ~~~ near space elevator ~~~~ ~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |