Dirac's 2cm/year Moon recession, due to neutrino coalescence in

Well if a new reader catches me in this book at this moment in time
is going to have difficulty in understanding. So let me summarize.

Dirac in his book Directions in Physics 1978 came to the point where
the
mathematics of the universe yields a new-radioactivity. Of course,
Dirac never had an Atom Totality theory to form a foundation for that
new-radioactivity as coming from the nucleus of the Atom Totality.
But according to the math and numbers and Large Numbers Hypothesis,
Dirac was able to speculate a new-radioactivity and which could be
tested on the Moon as to whether it recedes or not recedes. The
calculation Dirac made was 2cm/year for a Moon recession in order
for multiplicative creation to be true and for a new theory of how
Solar Systems and galaxies are formed-- new radioactivities.

In the 1990s it was confirmed via a laser that the Moon is receding
from
Earth at 2cm/year. But that finding along with Dirac's book have been
ignored in physics and astronomy.

What I am after in this book is details of Multiplicative Creation. I
have
three candidates:
(1) Cosmic Rays such as protons or hydrogen and helium atoms
(2) Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts: such as the recent burst that is the
energy of 9,000 supernova combined
(3) Neutrinos

In the 2nd edition of this Atom Totality book I gave a working analogy
of
the output of 1/6 of the flow of the Amazon River. That if we had a
1/6 Amazon
and given 5 billion years we would have a analogous planet Earth from
that
amount of flow.

So here I am trying to find out what that "flow" is that creates Earth
and planets
and stars from new-radioactivities.

I suspect the best candidate is neutrinos, and since they are so
abundant that
they are the most likely and plausible candidate.

Also, in the Atom Totality, gravity is the positron Space that
surrounds ordinary matter
which is in the electron-space. So gravity is positron-space and
matter is electron-space.
So here we have a chance of reconciling how neutrinos would coalesce,
in that if you
had a large number of neutrinos in a given ordinary-matter, that the
mechanism that
would convert neutrinos into their rest mass is available.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Jul 19, 1:47*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
Well if a new reader catches me in this book at this moment in time
is going to have difficulty in understanding. So let me summarize.

Dirac in his book Directions in Physics 1978 came to the point where
the
mathematics of the universe yields a new-radioactivity. Of course,
Dirac never had an Atom Totality theory to form a foundation for that
new-radioactivity as coming from the nucleus of the Atom Totality.
But according to the math and numbers and Large Numbers Hypothesis,
Dirac was able to speculate a new-radioactivity and which could be
tested on the Moon as to whether it recedes or not recedes. The
calculation Dirac made was 2cm/year for a Moon recession in order
for multiplicative creation to be true and for a new theory of how
Solar Systems and galaxies are formed-- new radioactivities.

In the 1990s it was confirmed via a laser that the Moon is receding
from
Earth at 2cm/year. But that finding along with Dirac's book have been
ignored in physics and astronomy.

What I am after in this book is details of Multiplicative Creation. I
have
three candidates:
(1) Cosmic Rays such as protons or hydrogen and helium atoms
(2) Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts: such as the recent burst that is the
energy of 9,000 supernova combined
(3) Neutrinos

In the 2nd edition of this Atom Totality book I gave a working analogy
of
the output of 1/6 of the flow of the Amazon River. That if we had a
1/6 Amazon
and given 5 billion years we would have a analogous planet Earth from
that
amount of flow.

So here I am trying to find out what that "flow" is that creates Earth
and planets
and stars from new-radioactivities.

I suspect the best candidate is neutrinos, and since they are so
abundant that
they are the most likely and plausible candidate.

Also, in the Atom Totality, gravity is the positron Space that
surrounds ordinary matter
which is in the electron-space. So gravity is positron-space and
matter is electron-space.
So here we have a chance of reconciling how neutrinos would coalesce,
in that if you
had a large number of neutrinos in a given ordinary-matter, that the
mechanism that
would convert neutrinos into their rest mass is available.


Now I know that neutrinos are leptonic matter and so it is hard
to visualize how neutrinos would end up forming a hydroden atom.
But if we visualize gravity as positron-space and we visualize
ordinary matter as the matter of the electron-space of the
Atom Totality, then when you have the two complimentary spaces
that a positron-neutrino would join with a electron-neutrino
and the rest mass in this conjoinment ending up to be
hadron matter. Now that may seem like a far leap. But since I
am confident that Dirac is correct in his new-radioactivities,
that if we apply a Occam's Razor to the reasoning here, the
most simple pure and simple mechanism of getting a Multiplicative
Creation is for neutrinos to coalesce inside of present
existing matter. And the easiest way is what I just described.



Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies