|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars
Sander Vesik wrote in:
Apparently only 'landing humans on xxx' is what counts for some people, and thus its the only thing NASA should really (and especially budget wise) pursue. And of course nasa would bae able to achieve more once-off show pieces of landing people on xxx if that was all it did. how useful that would be (or whetever it would in fact enhance spaceflight technology as a whole) is a completely different (and apparently not relevant to such people). Sander Sounds like the double talk NASA gives Congress at budget time every year. Maybe they could invite you as a character witness. ;-) So much for the book, "Learning English on $ 5.00 a day". :-) -- Rusty Barton - Antelope, California |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Jorge R. Frank | Space Shuttle | 17 | July 20th 03 10:01 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Jorge R. Frank | Policy | 1 | July 17th 03 09:02 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Jorge R. Frank | Policy | 1 | July 17th 03 05:17 AM |