|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:40 -0600, DrPostman
opined: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: DrPostman wrote in m: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? I never read AUK. Me either. I find AUK morally repugnant, as do all people of conscience. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:39:05 +1100, Lionel
wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:40 -0600, DrPostman opined: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: DrPostman wrote in : On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? I never read AUK. Me either. What is it? Some kind of acronym? I find AUK morally repugnant, as do all people of conscience. Thanks for the tip. If I see it hanging around anywhere near me, I'll report it to the proper authorities. PJR :-) -- _ _(o)_(o)_ _ FSM: http://www.venganza.org/ .._\`:_ F S M _:' \_, PJR: http://www.insurgent.org/~pjr/ / (`---'\ `-. AUK: http://www.netcabal.com/auk/ ,-` _) (_, F_P God's Own Newsreader: http://www.slrn.org/ |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:37:15 +0000, Peter J Ross
opined: On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:39:05 +1100, Lionel wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:40 -0600, DrPostman opined: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: DrPostman wrote in m: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? I never read AUK. Me either. What is it? Some kind of acronym? I find AUK morally repugnant, as do all people of conscience. Thanks for the tip. If I see it hanging around anywhere near me, I'll report it to the proper authorities. Good work, Peter! It's this kind of vigilence by good net-citizens like yourself that will rescue Usenet from the clutches of the Internet *terrorists* like this 'AUK' criminal, & make it safe again more for decent folk & their children. -- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:39:05 +1100, Lionel in
accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:40 -0600, DrPostman opined: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: DrPostman wrote in : On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? I never read AUK. Me either. I find AUK morally repugnant, as do all people of conscience. I don't have to read AUK when you nice folks make sure I see all I need to in afa-b. -- DrPostman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® #15-51506-253. AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004 You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com "There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live." - http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com/ |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Fred Hall wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:26:28 -0700, Art Deco wrote: Fred Hall wrote: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan wrote: DrPostman wrote in m: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? Pnzreba Would the real Cameron hijack group proposals in alt.config? tapping foot Pasta Head teh clown is such a coward. Next he'll try hiding behind Snibbs. When that fails I suppose he could resurrect Art Bell from the dead. Or Geezer. -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
LITS ALERT: AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:37:15 +0000, Peter J Ross opined: On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:39:05 +1100, Lionel wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:40 -0600, DrPostman opined: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: DrPostman wrote in om: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? I never read AUK. Me either. What is it? Some kind of acronym? I find AUK morally repugnant, as do all people of conscience. Thanks for the tip. If I see it hanging around anywhere near me, I'll report it to the proper authorities. Good work, Peter! It's this kind of vigilence by good net-citizens like yourself that will rescue Usenet from the clutches of the Internet *terrorists* like this 'AUK' criminal, & make it safe again more for decent folk & their children. Note that Pasta Head now has a lits o'haet decorating the ko0k****e and honoring kookologists: http://www.kotm.biz/ #136 for moi. -- Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
LITS ALERT: AFAB nomination: Brad Guth for Queen of denial LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
In article ,
Fred Hall said: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:28:27 -0700, Art Deco wrote: Lionel wrote: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:37:15 +0000, Peter J Ross opined: On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:39:05 +1100, Lionel wrote in alt.usenet.kooks: On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:40 -0600, DrPostman opined: On 21 Mar 2006 03:40:21 GMT, Rasta Khan in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: DrPostman wrote in news:c8tu12p04jn1vt2kgl3s69dn59g1l0dvtk@4ax. com: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:07 GMT, Bookman in accordance with The Prophecy scribed: On 19 Mar 2006 22:12:33 -0800, "Brad Guth" wrote: Rush group replaced with AUK, due to topicality The technology has existed since the Apollo program landed on the moon. The way to "get things going" is to find homesteads that people can get cheap/free, and to find "Gold in them thar hills". It's not impossible, just difficult and expensive. GOT HARD PROOF OTHER THAN YOUR NASA KROAN? GOT HARD-SCIENCE UPON ANY OF THAT CRAPOLLA? GOT SO MUCH AS A PROTOTYPE FLY-BY-ROCKET LANDER? GOT KODAK FILM THAT'S NOT BLUE AND NEAR-UV SENSITIVE? GOT ANY KODAK MOMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN XENON ILLUMINATED? GOT KODAK FILM OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN A CRAPY DR OF 128? GOT BETTER THAN 60:1 (ROCKET/PAYLOAD) CAPABILITY? GOT RAD-HARD DNA THAT'S GOOD FOR BEING HARD-X-RAY PROOF? GOT BIG MOON-BOOTS FOR WALKING ON FAR LESS THAN 5 G/CM2? For his ongoing devotion to believeing that men didn't walk on the moon, I nominate Bratty for the AFAB Cleopatra Award. Seconds? Very much seconded. In the old days you would have frowned upon this unnecessary cruelty, Posty. Even you had standards back then. When did you become a stAUKer? I never read AUK. Me either. What is it? Some kind of acronym? I find AUK morally repugnant, as do all people of conscience. Thanks for the tip. If I see it hanging around anywhere near me, I'll report it to the proper authorities. Good work, Peter! It's this kind of vigilence by good net-citizens like yourself that will rescue Usenet from the clutches of the Internet *terrorists* like this 'AUK' criminal, & make it safe again more for decent folk & their children. Note that Pasta Head now has a lits o'haet decorating the ko0k****e and honoring kookologists: http://www.kotm.biz/ #136 for moi. My name is there too. I should sue him for violation of trademark. Once I clicked on the link, I could have sworn I smelled burning pizza. Rasta Khan must've had Dockery over for dinner. -- Cm~ |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
I have driven ships and flown planes. I know where America's
technology is. I know what can be accomplished in short order. We simply need the 'will' to achieve. We've lost that will to achieve once we reelected our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush). Now that we've ****ed off nearly half the world is why we have to sleep with one eye open, thus we're all badly sleep deprived and therefore about to go postal. The U.S. economy will within 20 years of space travel go to the quadrillions per year, instead of paltry trillions. You're talking $1000/barrel, and is that just before or after WW-III, WW-IV or WW-V? We only have to get the LSE-CM/ISS up and running, as then it's so much easier to accomplish just about anything. Of course a naysay mindset like your's can's even see the brown that's on your nose. Ultimately, men can perform better than just machines. We are at the point of using men today, not just robots devices. Also, spreading out protects the species from annihilation. We'd still be decades away of doing Mars if man had to accomplish that task, and the same goes for our moon, which thus far hasn't even had a robotic mission unless making a rather nasty little crater was the intended plan of action. I see that you still can't focus worth a hoot. Therefore it's the all-inclusive (do everything) tomcat spaceplane or nothing. Notice that I'm not naysay as to that rigid spaceplane that could work just fine and dandy for doing Venus, at least in LVO(Low Venus Orbit) as being the mothership. Not just Venus, but it should be interplanetary with Pluto, et. al., within range. With a couple of ion engines Mars should not take more than 3 weeks to get there. But we can't get ourselves to Pluto, nor hardly Mars without killing off the crew and spending trillions in the process. Whereas Venus is extremely nearby and technically doable, more so and a whole lot safer than accomplishing our moon. Why are you so anti-Venus, anti-moon and even anti-humanity as much as you're anti-environment? Why can't you share and share alike with regard to LL-1, VL-2 or any number of doable considerations? What exactly is your pagan naysay and/or ulterior mainstream boxed problem? - Brad Guth |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
Brad Guth wrote: We've lost that will to achieve once we reelected our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush). Now that we've ****ed off nearly half the world is why we have to sleep with one eye open, thus we're all badly sleep deprived and therefore about to go postal. I don't think that George W. Bush has anything to do with this Middle East Terror. The countries in that part of the world are taking on the 'World Leader' country, The U.S., that is. They believe they are powerful enough to do it and they are trying. If successful they can corner the market on the world's remaining oil and set prices as they please. Huge wealth would flow to the oil rich middle east. We'd still be decades away of doing Mars if man had to accomplish that task, and the same goes for our moon, which thus far hasn't even had a robotic mission unless making a rather nasty little crater was the intended plan of action. The Moon is seen by Big Business as having little to offer, so little money has/is being spent on it for exploration. I believe they are wrong. It is a tremendously strategic location where men can work safe from the radioactivity of an orbital platform. I see that you still can't focus worth a hoot. Therefore it's the all-inclusive (do everything) tomcat spaceplane or nothing. Notice that I'm not naysay as to that rigid spaceplane that could work just fine and dandy for doing Venus, at least in LVO(Low Venus Orbit) as being the mothership. Not just Venus, but it should be interplanetary with Pluto, et. al., within range. With a couple of ion engines Mars should not take more than 3 weeks to get there. But we can't get ourselves to Pluto, nor hardly Mars without killing off the crew and spending trillions in the process. Whereas Venus is extremely nearby and technically doable, more so and a whole lot safer than accomplishing our moon. Venus, in my opinion, is an inhabited planet, based on your enlarged pictures. Mars, also, is inhabited based on my enlarged pictures at: http://stardot.blogspot.com/ Why irritate the Venusians and Martians? Let's stay away from those two planets for a while until proper dipolomatic relations can be established. tomcat |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
LIFE ON VENUS EXISTS!!!
I don't think that George W. Bush has anything to do with this Middle
East Terror. Trust me, you think wrong. The countries in that part of the world are taking on the 'World Leader' country, The U.S., that is. No, it's actually China or soon to become China. We've turned ourselves with the warm and fuzzy help of folks like yourself into a global and scientific worth of damn near nothing. The Moon is seen by Big Business as having little to offer, so little money has/is being spent on it for exploration. I believe they are wrong. It is a tremendously strategic location where men can work safe from the radioactivity of an orbital platform. There's little if any room for your SEC/Bush, WorldCom/Bush, Microsoft/Bush, Laden/Bush, ENRON/Bush or Halburton/Cheney/Bush style of takings and subsequently profit gouging at the demise of whomever gets in their way, especially since our moon and especially of LL-1 is in plain sight most all the time, therefore your "BIG Business" of certified LLPOF buttology is somewhat screwed. It's actially the LL-1 or Moon L-1 location that's by far worth all the serioyusly big bucks and global domination potential, and I'm by far not the first nor am I the one any only village idiot that knows perfectly damn good and well that this is 100+% correct. The problem that remains is that your so pagan naysay blined and intellectually dumbfounded that all you think about is impressing the upper most 0.1% of humanity that doesn't include a single Muslim or of any other faith that rocks thy boat, whereas many of your upper 0.1% having never earned an honest thin dime in their lives. It's multi-faced folks exactly like William Mook and yourself that claim to always know so gosh darn much, while supposedly not being brown-nosed minions to your pagan mainstream status quo, and as such you folks don't actually offer the rest of us so much as a gram of remorse that'll benefit the lower 99.9% of humanity, nor have you given an honest squat worth of considerations in favor of our environment. You're the ones in continual denials via dog-wags and the media likes of those spendy NOVA infomercials that are essentially refusing to promote establishing the available and affordably doable solutions, such as those 25 kw/m2 footprints of 100% green/renewable energy that'll put a 90% stoppage to the ongoing fossil fuel wastage, and thereby saving that valuable though nasty stuff for better things, as well as for saving more than 95% of the lives that are directly and those of us indirectly taken prematurely by the ongoing energy fiasco and of having to utilize that nasty stuff that sucks the life out of our environment and too often literally blows, that which you and your kind see absolutely nothing whatsoever improper about the past, present or future. Would you care to review a few side by sids listings of your side verses my side of this argument? Not just Venus, but it should be interplanetary with Pluto, et. al., within range. With a couple of ion engines Mars should not take more than 3 weeks to get there. But you're the one that's opposed to promoting the Ra--LRn breeder reactors that'll provide the best sorts of Rn--ion thrust per joule. Besides, your Mars has had a dead core for millions of years, is otherwise primarily sub-frozen, easily pulverized and clearly getting itself summarily TBI to death, and yet you want the rest of us to pay out another trillion for sending you there, just so that your butt is nowhere near the WW-III of collateral damage that's transpiring back here on Earth, and perhaps by the time you get back there will not be enough of anything left to fight over. Why irritate the Venusians and Martians? Let's stay away from those two planets for a while until proper dipolomatic relations can be established. Quite frankly I don't give a damn because, I can't think of anything that's sufficiently low enough as to properly reply to that pathetic two-faced statement of your's, just like I can't hardly keep a straight butt-crack while having to deal with your crapolla of infomercial-science and conditional laws of physics, that which fools and/or born-again liars like yourself are using as another perpetrated cold-war extension of sustaining the ongoing ruse, such as to our having supposedly walked upon the moon that's just as phony as baloney. BTW; Life that's of any intelligence and/or of sufficient stature upon Mars sucks because, at best there's been next to zilch worth of available energy, leaving it up to the most rad-hard and most likely robust antifreeze/glycol based DNA and thus most likely humanly lethal microbes, as having been derived from the remains of whatever once upon a time called the older than Earth planet of Mars their home. For one thing, and according to what's perfectly fine and dandy by way of your clearly pagan immoral high standards and accountability, that which are usually found sequestered within those spendy space-toilets, whereas we can always accuse Venusians of being too Islamic/Muslim like, and as having WMD, and then just barge ourselves in via the massive composite Tomcat-Spaceplane, as for stuffing it and anything else you can think of right into their dumbfounded heathen faces. On the other hand, I'm not the least bit worried about Mars, because that's already a lost cause. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 8 | May 26th 04 04:45 PM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Policy | 0 | May 21st 04 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 07:18 PM |
Space Calendar - January 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 7 | January 29th 04 09:29 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |