A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

House wants to "internationalize" NASA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 17th 08, 01:46 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Cosmic Ray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default House wants to "internationalize" NASA

Members of the House Science and Technology Committee may radically
reshape NASA's priorities with the new FY 2009 federal budget, The
bill would require NASA to seek international help in completing the
International Space Station, place far more emphasis on Earth
sciences, particularly with regard to "climate change," and found
further exploration, beyond low Earth orbit, on future international
agreements.

Rep. Mark Udall (D-CO), chairman of the Science and Technology
Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics has introduced House Bill 6063,
the "NASA Authorization Act of 2008" persuading bipartisan co-sponsors
in veteran Republican Ralph Hall (R-TX) and the full committee
chairman Rep. Bart Gordon (D-TN).

Mark-up of NASA's reauthorization for FY 2009 was set to continue May
20, but it remains unclear how radical a change in national policy
Udall's bill represents.

Negotiations were underway to enable NASA to keep its schedule to
retire the Space Shuttle in late 2010, complete the International
Space Station and continue design and testing already well-underway of
Orion, the first manned component of the Constellation program, and
the Ares I booster, currently scheduled to fly no sooner than 2015.

It is also not clear whether Congress intends for NASA to keep a 2020
appointment to begin construction of a permanent manned lunar base
near the moon's south pole.

In recent days, NASA reportedly scrapped yet another recommendation by
Vision planners, a problematic dry landing system for the Orion crew
module, saving time and funding overcoming thorny engineering problems
and 500 kilograms of vehicle weight, enabling NASA, planners agreed,
to keep its long-term time line.

- From Lunar Pioneer / Lunar Networks - http://lunarnetworks.blogspot.com
& http://www.lunarpioneer.com

Outline of Udall Act - (Bill Text not yet available):
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.6063:

Udall's "Revised and Extended Remarks" on H.R. 6063, May 15, 2008:
http://science.house.gov/press/PRArt...px?NewsID=2197
  #2  
Old May 17th 08, 01:58 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default House wants to "internationalize" NASA

On May 17, 7:46 am, Cosmic Ray wrote:
Members of the House Science and Technology Committee may radically
reshape NASA's priorities with the new FY 2009 federal budget, The
bill would require NASA to seek international help in completing the
International Space Station, place far more emphasis on Earth
sciences, particularly with regard to "climate change," and found
further exploration, beyond low Earth orbit, on future international
agreements.


In other words, the Russians, Europeans, Chinese and Indians, who
unlike America, have a rational approach to the development of space.

Rep. Mark Udall (D-CO), chairman of the Science and Technology
Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics has introduced House Bill 6063,
the "NASA Authorization Act of 2008" persuading bipartisan co-sponsors
in veteran Republican Ralph Hall (R-TX) and the full committee
chairman Rep. Bart Gordon (D-TN).

Mark-up of NASA's reauthorization for FY 2009 was set to continue May
20, but it remains unclear how radical a change in national policy
Udall's bill represents.


Ares I is a radical shift in a 50 year old rocketry paradigm. It's a
failure.

Negotiations were underway to enable NASA to keep its schedule to
retire the Space Shuttle in late 2010, complete the International
Space Station and continue design and testing already well-underway of
Orion, the first manned component of the Constellation program, and
the Ares I booster, currently scheduled to fly no sooner than 2015.


Ah ahha hahahahhaha hahahah ahha hhahah ... get a grip, man.

It is also not clear whether Congress intends for NASA to keep a 2020
appointment to begin construction of a permanent manned lunar base
near the moon's south pole.


Ha hahah ahhaha hahahahha ahhahahah ... get a grip, man.

In recent days, NASA reportedly scrapped yet another recommendation by
Vision planners, a problematic dry landing system for the Orion crew
module, saving time and funding overcoming thorny engineering problems
and 500 kilograms of vehicle weight, enabling NASA, planners agreed,
to keep its long-term time line.


The next administration is going to scrap VSE, ESAS, Ares and
Constellation completely, Udall is testing the temperature of the
water.
  #3  
Old May 17th 08, 05:14 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.station
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default House wants to "internationalize" NASA

On May 17, 5:58 am, kT wrote:
On May 17, 7:46 am, Cosmic Ray wrote:

Members of the House Science and Technology Committee may radically
reshape NASA's priorities with the new FY 2009 federal budget, The
bill would require NASA to seek international help in completing the
International Space Station, place far more emphasis on Earth
sciences, particularly with regard to "climate change," and found
further exploration, beyond low Earth orbit, on future international
agreements.


In other words, the Russians, Europeans, Chinese and Indians, who
unlike America, have a rational approach to the development of space.

Rep. Mark Udall (D-CO), chairman of the Science and Technology
Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics has introduced House Bill 6063,
the "NASA Authorization Act of 2008" persuading bipartisan co-sponsors
in veteran Republican Ralph Hall (R-TX) and the full committee
chairman Rep. Bart Gordon (D-TN).


Mark-up of NASA's reauthorization for FY 2009 was set to continue May
20, but it remains unclear how radical a change in national policy
Udall's bill represents.


Ares I is a radical shift in a 50 year old rocketry paradigm. It's a
failure.

Negotiations were underway to enable NASA to keep its schedule to
retire the Space Shuttle in late 2010, complete the International
Space Station and continue design and testing already well-underway of
Orion, the first manned component of the Constellation program, and
the Ares I booster, currently scheduled to fly no sooner than 2015.


Ah ahha hahahahhaha hahahah ahha hhahah ... get a grip, man.

It is also not clear whether Congress intends for NASA to keep a 2020
appointment to begin construction of a permanent manned lunar base
near the moon's south pole.


Ha hahah ahhaha hahahahha ahhahahah ... get a grip, man.

In recent days, NASA reportedly scrapped yet another recommendation by
Vision planners, a problematic dry landing system for the Orion crew
module, saving time and funding overcoming thorny engineering problems
and 500 kilograms of vehicle weight, enabling NASA, planners agreed,
to keep its long-term time line.


The next administration is going to scrap VSE, ESAS, Ares and
Constellation completely, Udall is testing the temperature of the
water.


Our NASA is based almost entirely upon lies, starting off with their
DARPA Apollo fiasco of lies upon lies (just like in their good old
Third Reich days).

BTW, there is intelligent other life existing/coexisting on Venus.
.. - Brad Guth
  #4  
Old May 18th 08, 03:07 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,736
Default House wants to "internationalize" NASA

Cosmic Ray wrote:
:
:Members of the House Science and Technology Committee may radically
:reshape NASA's priorities with the new FY 2009 federal budget, The
:bill would require NASA to seek international help in completing the
:International Space Station, place far more emphasis on Earth
:sciences, particularly with regard to "climate change," and found
:further exploration, beyond low Earth orbit, on future international
:agreements.
:

In other words, we'll **** away billions on introspective navel gazing
and international bloviation.

Given that choice, I vote we defund NASA entirely.

--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney
  #5  
Old May 19th 08, 04:29 AM posted to sci.space.policy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default House wants to "internationalize" NASA

On May 17, 7:07 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Cosmic Ray wrote:

:
:Members of the House Science and Technology Committee may radically
:reshape NASA's priorities with the new FY 2009 federal budget, The
:bill would require NASA to seek international help in completing the
:International Space Station, place far more emphasis on Earth
:sciences, particularly with regard to "climate change," and found
:further exploration, beyond low Earth orbit, on future international
:agreements.
:

In other words, we'll **** away billions on introspective navel gazing
and international bloviation.

Given that choice, I vote we defund NASA entirely.

--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney


Now you're talking what most of us overtaxed, fuel pump raped and
artificially inflated cost of living screwed folks have been thinking
for the past four decades and counting.

What is it about being summarily pillaged, plundered and screwed by
your own kind that makes you such a happy camper?
.. - Brad Guth
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
House wants to "internationalize" NASA kT Space Shuttle 1 May 17th 08 05:14 PM
House wants to "internationalize" NASA kT Space Station 1 May 17th 08 05:14 PM
...House Science Committee Chair calls Nasa a "TRAIN WRECK"! Jonathan Policy 9 May 14th 07 06:21 PM
Article on supposedly "unprecedented" heights of White House interference at NASA Jim Oberg History 73 February 19th 06 02:10 AM
Article on supposedly "unprecedented" heights of White House interference at NASA Eric Chomko Space Science Misc 0 February 15th 06 09:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.