|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Inclination change: worst case
Dumb question: If one were in circular LEO and crazy enough to want a
90-degree change of inclination, what's the cost in delta-v? Is it, as intuition is telling me, equivalent to throwing away all your ~9 kps and re-acquiring it all? I'm aware of the corrections for energy spent gaining altitude and fighting drag on the initial launch, and whatever freebie you may have gotten from the earth's rotation in a W-E launch. But is the broad-brush picture "almost as hard as getting to orbit in the first place"..? And for a still crazier 180-degree change, "twice as hard"..? (Assume a spherical Earth, homogeneous frictionless elephant, etc) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Monte Davis wrote: Dumb question: If one were in circular LEO and crazy enough to want a 90-degree change of inclination, what's the cost in delta-v? Is it, as intuition is telling me, equivalent to throwing away all your ~9 kps and re-acquiring it all? Not that bad, because there's a different strategy you've missed. You can do *any* LEO plane change with about 6.6km/s. The first 3.3km/s turns the orbit into a very elliptical one with an extremely high apogee. Coast up to apogee. Orbital velocity there is negligible, so a negligible burn can accomplish *any* plane change there. Coast back down. The other 3.3km/s converts the elliptical orbit back into a circular one. Add a little if you're impatient and prefer a somewhat less extreme apogee (you save almost nothing on the two big burns, and the actual plane change costs a bit more). Subtract some if you can use a lunar flyby to do the plane change. Subtract a whole bunch if you use aerobraking to do most of the final apogee lowering (but be warned that if you do it gradually, it takes a long time and you'll make many passes through the Van Allen belts). -- "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer -- George Herbert | |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Monte Davis" wrote in message
... Dumb question: If one were in circular LEO and crazy enough to want a 90-degree change of inclination, what's the cost in delta-v? Is it, as intuition is telling me, equivalent to throwing away all your ~9 kps and re-acquiring it all? (Assume a spherical Earth, homogeneous frictionless elephant, etc) Yes, your intuition is spot on. But you could save a little by either making the plane change elsewhere. Recall, escape speed from a circular orbit is root 2 times the orbital speed, so after a 2.8 km/s burn in your flight direction, you find yourself with a very high apogeee after a while, *then* when suitably far from the earth, perform the plane change for near zero delta-v cost, and then make a de-orbit burn of another 2.8 km/s, leaving you in a nice polar orbit. It'll take a bit longer than the brute-force powerered turn that you describe, and would be far less theatrical, but would save around 1.5 km/s. This option, for LEO to GEO is termed a super-syncrhonous plane change for obvious reasons, and is not uncommon. The other fun way is to deorbit and make the plane change in atmosphere. Use aerodynamic lift to rotate your velocity vector, raise your apogee with a burn and then circularize as normal. Much higher 'wow' factor but this is a non-spherical cow solution as you'll be riding in a (sadly) non-existing vehicle. -James Garry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, in sci.space.science,
Monte Davis said: Dumb question: If one were in circular LEO and crazy enough to want a 90-degree change of inclination, what's the cost in delta-v? Is it, as intuition is telling me, equivalent to throwing away all your ~9 kps and re-acquiring it all? It's not quite that bad, it's the vector difference between the two. Delta-v = 2 * v sin(alpha/2) (assuming v1=v2=v) delta-i delta-v/v ------- --------- 30° 52% 60° 100% 90° 141% 120° 173% 150° 193% 180° 200% But look how horrifying even a "small" 30° change in inclination is. That's why they make such a big deal over what the inclination of space stations should be, and why you can't just get from one to the other even though they're both "in orbit". -- Del Cotter Thanks to the recent increase in UBE, I will soon be ignoring email sent to . Please send your email to del2 instead. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
but someone got out and me and my familiy try to stop them and got trocherd in unknow dimentions i try to make it better and they change me to make it worse so what do i do if you see what in my chest in every dimention!!! look for consiousnesses in | zetasum | Policy | 1 | February 28th 05 02:44 AM |
All technology outdated | betalimit | Policy | 0 | September 20th 04 03:41 PM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Case, WIYN astronomers discover new galaxy orbiting Andromeda (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 03 04:27 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |