|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Proper Motion of M38
I was amusing myself by taking VRI photometry of M38 and making a CMD
to prove to myself that the main sequence exists. It appears that it does. I was then going to exclude field stars that were not part of the cluster based on proper motions. I used the proper motions from UCAC2. Using the 520 stars in my (fairly large) FOV I get an average proper motion in RA pmRA=-2.4 mas/yr and and in declination pmDE=-6.7 mas/yr. Yet a reference I found (de Oliveira et al A&A 390, 103-108 (2002)) states pmRA=3.6 mas/yr and pmDE=1.9 mas/yr. First there is the issue with the sign and second the issue of the difference in magnitude, especially in declination. My average is contaminated with all the field stars, but the cluster dominates the frame and most of the stars are from the cluster. The field stars may also sort of cancel each other out. I have a plot he http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/HR.jpg The magnitude scale is internally consistent but probably +/- 0.05 or more in relation to Landolt standards. Cheers, Michael Koppelman http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High proper motion. Q's | justbeats | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | November 22nd 04 09:51 AM |
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 6 | September 7th 04 09:29 PM |
Polaris: Precession & Proper Motion | Sandy Tipper | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 17th 04 02:46 PM |
Polaris, Proper Motion, and Precession | Sandy Tipper | Misc | 0 | April 12th 04 05:37 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |