|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
On Jan 8, 2:57*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"oldcoot" wrote in message ... Hagar wrote, Scientists have, over the past 12 years, tracked about 15 stars, which orbit a then unidentified object smack in the center of our galaxy. When they had accumulated enough trajectory data to triangulate the common center, all stars pointed to the same location. This was evidence of a supermassive BH and it also enabled the scientists to calculate its size to a high degree of accuracy. Yep, and there's at least one website that shows a time lapse movie of the orbiting stars. Not only that, this just came in: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108...tronomy_newsml... Sort of flushes GuthBall's drivel down the toilet ... again. So, now you not only favor but fully accept subjective observationology as objective proof-positive. If you don't mind, I'll hold that one against you. ~ BG |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
On Jan 9, 2:29*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 8, 2:57*pm, "Hagar" wrote: "oldcoot" wrote in message ... Hagar wrote, Scientists have, over the past 12 years, tracked about 15 stars, which orbit a then unidentified object smack in the center of our galaxy. When they had accumulated enough trajectory data to triangulate the common center, all stars pointed to the same location. This was evidence of a supermassive BH and it also enabled the scientists to calculate its size to a high degree of accuracy. Yep, and there's at least one website that shows a time lapse movie of the orbiting stars. Not only that, this just came in: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108...tronomy_newsml... Sort of flushes GuthBall's drivel down the toilet ... again. So, now you not only favor but fully accept subjective observationology as objective proof-positive. *If you don't mind, I'll hold that one against you. *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The center of our Galaxy and the giant black hole, is by the mainstream logically supposed to be located at the hart of Sagittarius A open star cluster see the star accelerations around the Sag A, the red cross : http://www.einstein-online.info/en/s..._bh/index.html http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081211.html So if a giant black hole is located inside Sag A, it would be expected that around Sag A the gaseous structure of space around Sag A is strongly influenced by that Giant and e.g. lots of swirling gas trails are visible which is not However, if black holes differ a little from the mainstream assumption, then there is a firm reason to suggest that these star accelerations also are possible in the middle TWO or even more DUAL giant black holes located outside the Galaxy. See: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...t-able-to.html In that case I assume that smaller black holes are located in the center of the Galaxy, as I depicted in my new image: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXS...++bijknipt.jpg Leo Vuyk. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
On Jan 8, 11:57*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"oldcoot" wrote in message ... Hagar wrote, Scientists have, over the past 12 years, tracked about 15 stars, which orbit a then unidentified object smack in the center of our galaxy. When they had accumulated enough trajectory data to triangulate the common center, all stars pointed to the same location. This was evidence of a supermassive BH and it also enabled the scientists to calculate its size to a high degree of accuracy. Yep, and there's at least one website that shows a time lapse movie of the orbiting stars. Not only that, this just came in: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108...tronomy_newsml... Sort of flushes GuthBall's drivel down the toilet ... again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks Hagar, for “What just came in”: Black holes predate galaxies scientists say, solving age-old riddle http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108... hkkU.V0PLBIF To understand how the universe got to be the way it is today, we must understand how the first stars and galaxies were formed when the universe was young," Carilli said. See for: my humble proposal of HOW the universe was formed by a Black hole evaporation and splitting process: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...uble-with.html Leo Vuyk |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
On Jan 9, 1:20*am, " wrote:
On Jan 9, 2:29*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jan 8, 2:57*pm, "Hagar" wrote: "oldcoot" wrote in message ... Hagar wrote, Scientists have, over the past 12 years, tracked about 15 stars, which orbit a then unidentified object smack in the center of our galaxy. When they had accumulated enough trajectory data to triangulate the common center, all stars pointed to the same location. This was evidence of a supermassive BH and it also enabled the scientists to calculate its size to a high degree of accuracy. Yep, and there's at least one website that shows a time lapse movie of the orbiting stars. Not only that, this just came in: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108...tronomy_newsml.... Sort of flushes GuthBall's drivel down the toilet ... again. So, now you not only favor but fully accept subjective observationology as objective proof-positive. *If you don't mind, I'll hold that one against you. *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The center of our Galaxy and the giant black hole, is by the mainstream logically supposed to be located at the hart of Sagittarius A open star cluster see the star accelerations around the Sag A, the red cross *:http://www.einstein-online.info/en/s.../ap081211.html So if a giant black hole is located inside Sag A, it would be expected that around Sag A the gaseous structure of space around Sag A is strongly influenced by that Giant and e.g. lots of swirling gas trails are visible which is not However, if black holes differ a little from the mainstream assumption, then there is a firm reason to suggest that these star accelerations also are possible in the middle TWO or even more DUAL giant black holes located outside the Galaxy. See: * *http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ream-physics-i... In that case I assume that smaller black holes are located in the center of the Galaxy, as I depicted in my new image:http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXS...AAABEE/FqyaDuS... Leo Vuyk. No good reason to believe that massive binary or trinary BHs outside of our galaxy don't exist, and thus create their very own barycenters. However, I do not believe a barycenter can generate its own tidal radius, though I could certainly be wrong. Some kind of nearly invisible mass (possibly made of electrons or positrons) is in charge of our galactic core, whereas the weak force of gravity alone may not be the only consideration. Massless BHs of perhaps mostly photons or possibly gravitons also seems doable, although I tend to favor that even photons could represent mass. ~ BG |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
On Jan 9, 2:42*am, " wrote:
On Jan 8, 11:57*pm, "Hagar" wrote: "oldcoot" wrote in message ... Hagar wrote, Scientists have, over the past 12 years, tracked about 15 stars, which orbit a then unidentified object smack in the center of our galaxy. When they had accumulated enough trajectory data to triangulate the common center, all stars pointed to the same location. This was evidence of a supermassive BH and it also enabled the scientists to calculate its size to a high degree of accuracy. Yep, and there's at least one website that shows a time lapse movie of the orbiting stars. Not only that, this just came in: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108...tronomy_newsml... Sort of flushes GuthBall's drivel down the toilet ... again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks Hagar, for “What just came in”: Black holes predate galaxies scientists say, solving age-old riddlehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090108/sc_afp/usscienceastronomy_newsml... To understand how the universe got to be the way it is today, we must understand how the first stars and galaxies were formed when the universe was young," Carilli said. See for: my humble proposal of HOW the universe was formed by a Black hole evaporation and splitting process:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...action-lee-smo... Leo Vuyk There's a lot to be said for the cosmic power of electrons and positrons, that which each seem individually as though more like miniature black holes. I think your research is on the right track. It would make good deductive logic for there to be positron and electron black holes. ~ BG |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 12:52 pm, "Hagar" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 7:14 am, "Hagar" wrote: snip GuthBall drivel How about the GA (Great Attractor), SMBH(s) or complex barycenter? *** The Great Attractor is a scientifically established fact. However, no absolute identification of the enigma has been made to date. A bary center is the pivot point between any two orbiting bodies, and is thus gravitationally neutral, you loon. However, your SMBH (Small Mind - Big Head) could qualify as a huge, albeit useless, unattractive mass. *** |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
On Jan 9, 7:24*am, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 8, 12:52 pm, "Hagar" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message .... On Jan 8, 7:14 am, "Hagar" wrote: snip GuthBall drivel How about the GA (Great Attractor), SMBH(s) or complex barycenter? *** The Great Attractor is a scientifically established fact. *However, no absolute identification of the enigma has been made to date. A bary center is the pivot point between any two orbiting bodies, and is thus gravitationally neutral, you loon. However, your SMBH (Small Mind - Big Head) could qualify as a huge, albeit useless, unattractive mass. *** Good try, but none of that is even funny. Now flush before anyone else has to use your personal toilet. ~ BG |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I Have A Giant Black Hole
You have something to laugh about, AssAlexa? lmfjao!
The CRAP is all YOURS, dear! Saul Levy On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:02:33 -0600, "www.freedomtofascism.com " wrote: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Snip Crap |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way.
Transfering quantum states is a LONG WAY from sending YOU to Venus,
BradBoi! lmfjao! If Bushie gets transported to a RAGHEAD town, he should have a few of those new high-capacity military SHOTGUNS! They are REALLY WICKED! The RAGHEADS HATE SHOTGUNS anyway! You understand that Bushie would win? He would. They have a spin-stabalized explosive round for it. BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! KILL ALL TERRORISTS AND PIRATES! Saul Levy On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:41:26 -0800 (PST), BradGuth wrote: As of recently, a form of quantum teleportation has modified a pair of isolated individual atoms, further suggesting the (electron/positron) photon as the altered ions/atoms or quantum worthy mass via teleportation is objectively real physics, meaning that the results can be peer replicated. Perhaps similar to the LHC outcome, the ultimate test would be to quantum teleportate GW Bush to some obscure Muslim town. (what could possibly go wrong?) “An ion is an atom or molecule which has lost or gained one or more electrons, giving it a positive or negative electrical charge.” http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/um_in_news/ http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten...t/323/5913/486 http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...tion-with-ions ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NO Giant black hole inside the CENTER of our milky way. | [email protected][_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | January 14th 09 10:31 AM |
Evidence grows that center of Milky Way is a black hole (The... | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | September 19th 08 11:51 AM |
Milky Way's giant black hole awoke from slumber 300 years ago(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 3 | April 16th 08 04:51 AM |