|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Physical Divestitures
On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 9:04:02 AM UTC-7, mimus99 wrote:
So apparently some object to the very common interpretation of general relativity in terms of space being curved on the ground that it's the geometry that's curved, not the spacetime. But what good is a geometry that doesn't correlate to the intrinsic structure of spacetime? troll w/ zero brain cells. use Kepler's second area law. However, you are too stupid to understand it; that will solve your puzzle. in fact, Albert Jew boy plagerizer ripped off Christian Kepler's second law which is Special Relativity. space curves, Kepler but time does not. But you can increase scalar geo to fit it. U r too dumb to function. lolz. bookoflife.org I bet these are the same people who claim that the uncertainty principle negates determinism, even though it says nothing about it, and indeed depends on it: How else can instrument effect and affect observation, or observation affect the observed? -- Grumpy today. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Physical Interpretations? | Onoit | Solar | 1 | March 17th 09 10:04 AM |
The physical education. | socratus | Misc | 1 | October 17th 08 10:15 AM |
TRUE physical | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 59 | June 9th 06 12:07 PM |
TRUE physical | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 59 | June 9th 06 12:07 PM |
fundamental physical constants | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 9th 05 10:03 AM |