What if(on easy universe)

To construct the simplist universe is as easy as this. Have electron
moving at c TreBert

On Apr 12, 7:27*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
To construct the simplist universe is as easy as this. Have electron
moving at c * TreBert

I agree, that the black hole nature of the invisible but relatively
high density worth of an electron, or that of its antimatter positron,
are key to formulating a given universe (large or small).

Moving electrons and positrons along at c or faster would certainly
represent a great deal of volumetric black hole energy, especially if
these electrons and positrons were to be colliding at nearly 2c as
planed to take place at the LHC, whereas the 2c colliding of protons
plus 100 tonnes of helium fusion could manage to cause a rather nifty
terrestrial nova of some interesting proportions. (what could possibly
go wrong?)

~ BG

On Apr 12, 7:27*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
To construct the simplist universe is as easy as this. Have electron
moving at c * TreBert


An electron moving at c would have infinite mass!

Double-A

On Apr 14, 7:55*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Apr 12, 7:27*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

To construct the simplist universe is as easy as this. Have electron
moving at c * TreBert

An electron moving at c would have infinite mass!

Double-A

Not sure about that, unless e=mc2 is bogus because the speed of light
is nearly as infinite as is the velocity of gravity.

300,000 km/s really isn't all that fast.

~ BG

Double A You are seeing the light. Infinite mass could describe this
type of "Easy Universe" Not all universes have to be the same,and speed
of electrons could make the relative difference from one to the other.
The very easiest universe would have only one electron if it moved
instantaneously. can't get much simpler than that TreBert

On Apr 15, 6:17*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double A *You are seeing the light. Infinite mass could describe this
type of "Easy Universe" Not all universes have to be the same,and speed
of electrons could make the relative difference from one to the other.
The very easiest universe would have only one electron if it moved
instantaneously. can't get much simpler than that * TreBert

Velocity doesn't increase mass, at least not in the real world.
Perhaps in your quantum world there's an increase in mass, though I
kind of doubt it.

~ BG

On Apr 15, 6:17*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double A *You are seeing the light. Infinite mass could describe this
type of "Easy Universe" Not all universes have to be the same,and speed
of electrons could make the relative difference from one to the other.
The very easiest universe would have only one electron if it moved
instantaneously. can't get much simpler than that * TreBert


Oh I see, the What If there is only one electron theory!

Double-A

On Apr 14, 8:15*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 14, 7:55*pm, Double-A wrote:

On Apr 12, 7:27*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

To construct the simplist universe is as easy as this. Have electron
moving at c * TreBert

An electron moving at c would have infinite mass!

Double-A

Not sure about that, unless e=mc2 is bogus because the speed of light
is nearly as infinite as is the velocity of gravity.

300,000 km/s really isn't all that fast.

*~ BG


m = m_0 / sqrt( 1 - ( v^2 / c^2 ) )

When v approaches c, m approaches infinity.

Double-A

On Apr 15, 8:03*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Apr 14, 8:15*pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Apr 14, 7:55*pm, Double-A wrote:

On Apr 12, 7:27*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

To construct the simplist universe is as easy as this. Have electron
moving at c * TreBert

An electron moving at c would have infinite mass!

Double-A

Not sure about that, unless e=mc2 is bogus because the speed of light
is nearly as infinite as is the velocity of gravity.

300,000 km/s really isn't all that fast.

*~ BG

m = m_0 / sqrt( 1 - ( v^2 / c^2 ) )

When v approaches c, m approaches infinity.

Double-A

As I said before, 300,000 km/s isn't very fast.

Supernova can manage to expand their cloud or bubble of debris at
roughly 0.1c (30,000 km/s), and it's not because of any increased
mass that limits this outward flow.

Now, as a graviton has unlimited velocity, this could be entirely
different, as the expanding material has to pull against all the other
expanding matter.

~ BG

Double A That instantly moving one electron theory came out of Feynman
and Wheeler fooling around with that idea. It is non-sense in the macro
realm but in the quantum realm(micro) it could answer how an electron
can be in two places at once,and can fit with Feynman's "Sum of the
History theory"(two slit answer) go figure TreBert