|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Black Holes in Early Universe
I have two questions.
How were black holes formed in early universe when there were no starts? What other ways black holes are formed besides supre nova explosions? Please post web sites on these topics. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Search Google: primordial black hole
~ 35K hits... "Akh" wrote in message ... I have two questions. How were black holes formed in early universe when there were no starts? What other ways black holes are formed besides supre nova explosions? Please post web sites on these topics. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Akh" wrote in message ... I have two questions. How were black holes formed in early universe when there were no starts? I guess there were no black holes back then, at least not the kind we think exist now (remains of stars) What other ways black holes are formed besides supre nova explosions? I would not know, but any situation with high enough density mass will know black holes, I guess that at the beginning of the universe, all mass was compressed into a very small volume, hence it was probably a black hole (if photons did exist back then) Please post web sites on these topics. sorry, I suggest you use google. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Akh" wrote in message ... I have two questions. How were black holes formed in early universe when there were no starts? What other ways black holes are formed besides supre nova explosions? Please post web sites on these topics. Here's my theory (of course someone else could have had same theory though mine is independent)... There were always been black hole and matter.... Silly religious idea that universe must have BEGINNING is probably wrong.... And "the" big bang is just "a" big bang cause by collision of 2 black holes. It is possible that such collision causes mini black holes.... Or it is possible that result will be one black hole, but with large energy release. You can think of it this way.... Water evaperate (big bang), cool and condenses forms cloud (form matter), rain (star/black hole) and cycle begin again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Akh" wrote in message
... I have two questions. How were black holes formed in early universe when there were no starts? What other ways black holes are formed besides supre nova explosions? Simply collect enough matter in a finite region of space. This would probably not be too difficult to do in the early, denser universe. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
There are no black holes, they are only theoretical object. If you can not
see it, it do not exist. All this stuff is ****ing cooked up Theoreticians. "Akh" wrote in message ... I have two questions. How were black holes formed in early universe when there were no starts? What other ways black holes are formed besides supre nova explosions? Please post web sites on these topics. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.551 / Virus Database: 343 - Release Date: 12/12/2003 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rajesh
Khanna writes There are no black holes, they are only theoretical object. If you can not see it, it do not exist. All this stuff is ****ing cooked up Theoreticians. Plonk. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
One could easily have the idea that out of the big bang came blackholes
that were the size of a proton. That could be used to answer many mysteries of the structure and placement of hydrogen clouds. Could be the dark matter to help add to the 95% of the gravity(mass) missing. Well I posted that explosion of 1908 could have been a BH the size of a proton going through the Earth. A BH the size of a proton in deep space could keep a rock the size of a mountain orbiting around it. Problem is both would be invisible. Still it could be reality. Maybe that great explosion in Siberia was telling us that BH the size of protons are out there,and keeping the Earth rotating around the galaxy Bert. PS Could be the one pole particle that was theorized to come out of the BB was really a BH the size of a proton ????? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... One could easily have the idea that out of the big bang came blackholes that were the size of a proton. That could be used to answer many mysteries of the structure and placement of hydrogen clouds. Could be the dark matter to help add to the 95% of the gravity(mass) missing. Well I posted that explosion of 1908 could have been a BH the size of a proton going through the Earth. A BH the size of a proton in deep space could keep a rock the size of a mountain orbiting around it. Problem is both would be invisible. Still it could be reality. A proton is ~ 1fm in diameter, so a proton sized black hole would have a mass of ~ 300 x 10^9 kg. I don't know the mass of any mountains off hand, but we can model one as a pyramid of rock with 1 km^2 base and 1km high. I guess that would be a smallish mountain, as Everest is around 8km high. If a mean density of 3 g/cm^3 is assumed, the small mountain would have a mass of 10^12 kg. So, a small mountain would have a higher mass than a proton sized black hole. DaveL |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Dave
writes "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... One could easily have the idea that out of the big bang came blackholes that were the size of a proton. That could be used to answer many mysteries of the structure and placement of hydrogen clouds. Could be the dark matter to help add to the 95% of the gravity(mass) missing. Well I posted that explosion of 1908 could have been a BH the size of a proton going through the Earth. A BH the size of a proton in deep space could keep a rock the size of a mountain orbiting around it. Problem is both would be invisible. Still it could be reality. A proton is ~ 1fm in diameter, so a proton sized black hole would have a mass of ~ 300 x 10^9 kg. I don't know the mass of any mountains off hand, but we can model one as a pyramid of rock with 1 km^2 base and 1km high. I guess that would be a smallish mountain, as Everest is around 8km high. If a mean density of 3 g/cm^3 is assumed, the small mountain would have a mass of 10^12 kg. So, a small mountain would have a higher mass than a proton sized black hole. DaveL Also, these tiny black holes aren't stable and are evaporating because of Hawking radiation. There's a pretty good idea of how many primordial BHs there are because this radiation hasn't been observed. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
The Colour of the Young Universe (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 19th 03 05:48 PM |
Black Holes & Gravastars | Gordon D. Pusch | Science | 3 | July 29th 03 04:41 PM |
Link between Black Holes and Galaxies Discovered in Our Own Backyard(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 07:36 PM |