|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Path:
sn-us!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-09!sn-xit-14!supernews.com!postnews.google.com!news4. google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganew s.com!nntp.giganews.com!lo cal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.io.com!news.io.com .POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:44:56 -0600 From: OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org Newsgroups: sci.space.history Subject: STS51L Accident Questions Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:46:53 -0600 Organization: Charter Member & Sergeant--At-Arms, Human O-Ring Society, US Chapter Message-ID: References: gGVQd.90629$0u.6111@fed1read04 EH9Td.117495$0u.20820@fed1read04 twbTd.117878$0u.115260@fed1read04 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.224.83.131 X-Trace: sv3-GueQkiZmmF6g6yP9w+/5OKtSyZy1bwmdviE9f4G0OxnKIUBoFsGSER2tawdQp94QVkLcP 1FQ SiIDHqe!BeuzL3ZxbQPDo2tMZMiTIA7BC0LjhoVHodJxyuZ8qd Vj+efxmHcwMjmDjg593NKqQzAH Al67iOA+!a+cSwq9i0vY= X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To: X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.31 Xref: sn-us sci.space.history:199967 On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:05:00 -0500, Chuck Stewart wrote: Dear Bast, it _was_ hereditary after all... ....You mean to tell me you didn't figure this out the first time he posted supporting his child molesting father?? [shakes head in utter dismay] OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr Bob, Exactly whom are you claiming that John Thomas Maxson of Iowa molested? It has been roughly 3 or 4 years now that you have posted this claim. Please provide proof of your defamatory claim that is archived on servers around the world. Leaving the group obviously doesn't work so I want to get to the bottom of this claim once and for all. I feel your written comments are damaging and harassing in nature and have nothing to do with "space history" .. Yet you make these claims weekly, year after year. Daniel Maxson may overlook your defamation of character but I assure you that I will not now and I never have in the past. I have also asked you to stop doing so several times. It's time for you to prove your claims or retract them. I am publicly asking you to do so now. I am John Maxson's son (for the record.) 2-24-05 1035 hrs PST. P.S. "You're rather close to the line." Dave, Exactly where is the "line drawn" on this Usenet forum? Sincerely, Paul Maxson |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:37:40 -0800, "Paul Maxson"
wrote: Exactly where is the "line drawn" on this Usenet forum? ....Right he PLONK ....Once again, problem solved. Begone. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
OM wrote:
...You do realize that the insanity runs deep within his family shrub, not so much a shrub, more of a Chia Pet -- Terrell Miller "Every gardener knows nature's random cruelty" -Paul Simon George Harrison |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Derek Lyons" wrote:
"Charleston" wrote: Now you do of course realize that one in particular camera is the one camera upon which NASA formed its precise conclusions as to the most probable cause of the disaster, right?. One particular camera, plus metric buttloads of telemetry evidence, plus considerable physical evidence, plus, plus, plus.... It's not nearly as simple as you make it out to be. True, but almost all of the STS 51-L launch photography is inextricably linked by NASA to the E-207 film and therein lies the issue. As for the telemetry, seeing is nauseating, trust me Derek. I can even send you some if you will trust a spreadsheet from MSFC. Daniel |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Terrell Miller" wrote:
OM wrote: ...You do realize that the insanity runs deep within his family shrub, not so much a shrub, more of a Chia Pet. Reduced to babbling with Saint Jerome. Daniel |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:49:58 -0500, Terrell Miller
wrote: OM wrote: ...You do realize that the insanity runs deep within his family shrub, not so much a shrub, more of a Chia Pet ....Yeah, but how do we go about having said pet spayed and/or neutered? OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul Maxson" wrote:
Bob, snip Saint JerOMe post Exactly whom are you claiming that John Thomas Maxson of Iowa molested? OM's claims are simply adolescent prurient bull**** not worth the time it takes to read them. It has been roughly 3 or 4 years now that you have posted this claim. Please provide proof of your defamatory claim that is archived on servers around the world. Leaving the group obviously doesn't work so I want to get to the bottom of this claim once and for all. I feel your written comments are damaging and harassing in nature and have nothing to do with "space history" . Yet you make these claims weekly, year after year. Hence my reference to OM's prurient nature. Prurient: adj. 1.. Inordinately interested in matters of sex; lascivious. 2.. 1.. Characterized by an inordinate interest in sex: prurient thoughts. 2.. Arousing or appealing to an inordinate interest in sex: prurient literature. Daniel Maxson may overlook your defamation of character but I assure you that I will not now and I never have in the past. Most of the time, I overlook OM's preoccupation with being an absolute jerk. Sigmund would have loved OM. I do not consider anything *personal* OM writes about me, my family members or anyone else here for that matter, anything more than temporary electrons clogging up my screen. To give OM a serious response is to give him credibility. Don't judge this group based on his behavior. People here have tried to influence him in a positive manner from time to time with varying degrees of success. In the end (literally) OM is still a human hole through which much **** passes. Nevertheless even OM has some good in him. Trust me Paul, everyone needs an asshole;-) I have also asked you to stop doing so several times. It's time for you to prove your claims or retract them. I am publicly asking you to do so now. I am John Maxson's son (for the record.) 2-24-05 1035 hrs PST. Exactly where is the "line drawn" on this Usenet forum? There is a line. That line is the point at which many good people leave a group and rarely come back. It has been crossed here and elsewhere many times. Daniel |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"Charleston" wrote:
"Derek Lyons" wrote: "Charleston" wrote: Now you do of course realize that one in particular camera is the one camera upon which NASA formed its precise conclusions as to the most probable cause of the disaster, right?. One particular camera, plus metric buttloads of telemetry evidence, plus considerable physical evidence, plus, plus, plus.... It's not nearly as simple as you make it out to be. True, but almost all of the STS 51-L launch photography is inextricably linked by NASA to the E-207 film and therein lies the issue. Therein lies the non-issue you mean. No matter how much film you post, or how much you bray, the basic failure mechanism remains the same. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
OM wrote:
...You do realize that the insanity runs deep within his family shrub, not so much a shrub, more of a Chia Pet ...Yeah, but how do we go about having said pet spayed and/or neutered? dunno, one would think that in his case we'd be talking about a self-limiting system. But apparently not :O -- Terrell Miller "Every gardener knows nature's random cruelty" -Paul Simon George Harrison |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Charleston wrote:
not so much a shrub, more of a Chia Pet. Reduced to babbling with Saint Jerome. I thought that was the Blessed St. Germain... -- Terrell Miller LaToya, Tito |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lessons Learned but Forgotten from the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 13th 04 04:58 PM |
Lessons Learned but Forgotten from the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident | Jim Oberg | History | 0 | December 13th 04 04:58 PM |
"Hindsight bias" could hide real lessons of Columbia accident report,expert says (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 3rd 03 01:54 AM |
NASA Administrator Accepts Columbia Accident Report | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 3 | August 27th 03 04:48 PM |
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Releases Final Report | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 26th 03 03:30 PM |