|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hydrogrn Production From Nuclear Fission & Fusion
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:22:15 -0400, Bama Brian
wrote: * wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:09:13 -0700, House Widdershins wrote: [...] Nope. They talk about the research, and the hope of being able to get a sustained fusion reaction, but not one of them claims success. Liar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak The first sentence at the site above says, "A tokamak is a toroidal, (doughnut shaped) magnetic plasma confinement device, the leading candidate for producing magnetic fusion energy." It says LEADING CANDIDATE. That means nothing has yet been produced. Go read your own citations. Idiot. It is a working fusion reactor. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hydrogrn Production From Nuclear Fission & Fusion
In article ,
wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:22:15 -0400, Bama Brian wrote: * wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:09:13 -0700, House Widdershins wrote: [...] Nope. They talk about the research, and the hope of being able to get a sustained fusion reaction, but not one of them claims success. Liar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak The first sentence at the site above says, "A tokamak is a toroidal, (doughnut shaped) magnetic plasma confinement device, the leading candidate for producing magnetic fusion energy." It says LEADING CANDIDATE. That means nothing has yet been produced. Go read your own citations. Idiot. It is a working fusion reactor. It is quite difficult for me to understand how someone's mind can be as blank as yours apparently is, Alexa. -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation Agent, and "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hydrogrn Production From Nuclear Fission & Fusion
Go read your own citations.
Idiot. It is a working fusion reactor. heck.... My backyard pool is a "working" fusion reactor.....im sure sometime somewhere in all those atoms....2 hydrogens have managed to fuse over all these years take care Blll |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hydrogrn Production From Nuclear Fission & Fusion
X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:41:08 -0600, "Carl R.
Osterwald" wrote: In article , wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:22:15 -0400, Bama Brian wrote: * wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:09:13 -0700, House Widdershins wrote: [...] Nope. They talk about the research, and the hope of being able to get a sustained fusion reaction, but not one of them claims success. Liar. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak The first sentence at the site above says, "A tokamak is a toroidal, (doughnut shaped) magnetic plasma confinement device, the leading candidate for producing magnetic fusion energy." It says LEADING CANDIDATE. That means nothing has yet been produced. Go read your own citations. Idiot. It is a working fusion reactor. It is quite difficult for me to understand how someone's mind can be as blank as yours apparently is, Alexa. There's a new medical procedure out. The doctors remove the brain, and spray it with Teflon (R) before sticking it back in. Widdershins Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate: http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html Three lies on one line. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hydrogrn Production From Nuclear Fission & Fusion
In article ,
wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:41:08 -0600, "Carl R. Osterwald" wrote: {snip} Unbelievable! I agree, your kooky theories are way beyond believable. -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation Agent, and "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How does the Tokamak work? | Charles Cagle | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | September 11th 03 09:46 PM |
N by M Body Fusion | Charles Cagle | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 03 11:30 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |