SR time dilation on remote objects ?

SR time dilation on remote objects ?

Question:

Can time be "SR dilated" on remote galaxies or supernovae, because
of space expansion?

Details are given hereafter, as well as the refusal by the
moderator to post my question in sci.physics.research

Marcel Luttgens

_______


Date : 04/07/04 15:18
To : "Urs Schreiber"

Object : SR Time dilation on supernovae ?

Dear Urs Schreiber,

I am not "saying that contemporary cosmology and GR are fundamentally
wrong", I prove it. Why don't you allow experts to disprove my
demonstration? Science doesn't deserves censorship.

I am confident that you wouldn't mind if I posted your present
refusal on another, not "moderated" newsgroup. Am I too optimistic?
If you don't answer, I'll conclude that you agree.

Marcel Luttgens

Date: 04/07/04 14:33
From : "Urs Schreiber"
To : "Marcel Luttgens"

Objet : SR Time dilation on supernovae ?

I am sorry, but saying that contemporary cosmology and GR are
fundamentally wrong is overly speculative and not appropriate
for s.p.r.

Sincerely,

Urs Schreiber,
moderator, s.p.r.


----- Original Message -----

From: "Marcel Luttgens"
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 2:29 PM
Subject: SR Time dilation on supernovae ?


Excerpt from:

High Redshift Supernovae from the IfA Deep Survey:
Doubling the SN Sample at z 0 . 7

(arXiv: astro- ph/ 0310843 v1 29 Oct 2003)

Brian J. Barris, John L. Tonry, Stephane Blondin, Peter Challis,
Ryan Chornock, Alejandro Clocchiatti, Alexei V. Filippenko,
Peter Garnavich, Stephen T. Holland, Saurabh Jha, Robert P. Kirshner,
Kevin Krisciunas, Bruno Leibundgut, Weidong Li, Thomas Matheson,
Gajus Miknaitis, Adam G. Riess, Brian P. Schmidt, R. Chris Smith,
Jesper Sollerman, Jason Spyromilio, Christopher W. Stubbs, Nicholas
B. Suntzeff, Herve Aussel, K. C. Chambers, M. S. Connelley,
D. Donovan, J. Patrick Henry, Nick Kaiser, Michael C. Liu,
Eduardo L. Martin, and Richard J. Wainscoat

Excerpt (p.12):

"Typically, the discovery epoch of a high-z supernova
is a few days before maximum brightness, and although
the time dilation factor of (1 + z) works to lessen
the delay in the rest frame, etc...".

As no time dilation factor can be due to space recession
(cf. the "Triplets tought experiment" below), the contemporary
cosmologists are fundamentally wrong.

One can thus wonder about the degree of confidence that can be
given to their interpretation of the supernovae observations,
especially with regard to the acceleration of the assumed
expansion and the correlatively hypothesized dark energy.

The validity of GR formulae is also questionable, because
GR expresses the red shift of distant sources in terms of
special relativity (the "relativistic Doppler" formula).

The "Triplets" thought experiment (Cf. the "Twin paradox")
_________________________________

Terence sits at home on Earth. Galaxy (yes, it's her name)
flies off in a space ship at a velocity v/2. Simultaneously,
Terra (also a name) flies off in the opposite direction at -v/2.
After a while, Terra, a SR adept who considers that Galaxy
flies away from her at a velocity v, claims that Galaxy is now
younger than her, exactly like the GRists claim that time
goes slower on SN because of space expansion.
According to Terence, both Terra and the GRists are wrong,
because Terra's clock and Galaxy's clock tick at the same
rate.

Question:
________

Can time be "SR dilated" on supernovae, because of space
expansion?

Thanks,

Marcel Luttgens