A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dangers of Remailers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 15th 05, 04:42 PM
John Schoenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dangers of Remailers


Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted
messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government
decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're misinformed.


Clinton legalized the public use of RSA and PGP encryption against the
wishes of the NSA and Republican congress. You know nothing, idiot.

  #2  
Old February 16th 05, 04:52 AM
starburst
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Schoenfeld wrote:

Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted
messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government
decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're
misinformed.



Clinton legalized the public use of RSA and PGP encryption against
the wishes of the NSA and Republican congress. You know nothing,
idiot.


Dumbass:

PGP never was illegal, and the argument over making it illegal went
across party lines. Neither side covered themselves with glory. But the
Clinton administration backed off of its own proposals to outlaw or
strictly regulate internet encryption:

"Representatives Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia,
and Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, took a
libertarian stance earlier this year when they
introduced a bill they called Security and Freedom
through Encryption. The legislation, known by the
acronym SAFE, would have liberalized export controls to
allow the United States software industry to compete
internationally, and it would have added new criminal
penalties for anyone who used encryption in the
commission of a crime. It quickly attracted more than
250 co-sponsors.

But under heavy lobbying by the Clinton administration,
SAFE has met increased resistance. Committees have
gutted key provisions and added language that would
sharply increase encryption regulations for Americans."

(New York Times Op-ed piece 9/24/97)

And the following day in the News section:

"WASHINGTON The House Commerce Committee put the brakes on a
fast-moving plan to put the first-ever domestic controls on data
scrambling technology, rejecting 35 to 16 a Federal Bureau of
Investigation-backed proposal to require all American computer
users to register the codes to their encrypted software."

This committee by the way was in a Republican-controlled house.

So pull your head out. And stop dismissing others who simply disagree
with you, you butthole. Your view of history seems a bit misguided to
smugly call other people names.

C
  #3  
Old February 16th 05, 06:37 PM
John Schoenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


starburst wrote:
John Schoenfeld wrote:

Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted
messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government
decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're
misinformed.



Clinton legalized the public use of RSA and PGP encryption against
the wishes of the NSA and Republican congress. You know nothing,
idiot.


Dumbass:

PGP never was illegal, and the argument over making it illegal went
across party lines. Neither side covered themselves with glory. But

the
Clinton administration backed off of its own proposals to outlaw or
strictly regulate internet encryption:

"Representatives Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia,
and Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, took a
libertarian stance earlier this year when they
introduced a bill they called Security and Freedom
through Encryption. The legislation, known by the
acronym SAFE, would have liberalized export controls to
allow the United States software industry to compete
internationally, and it would have added new criminal
penalties for anyone who used encryption in the
commission of a crime. It quickly attracted more than
250 co-sponsors.

But under heavy lobbying by the Clinton administration,
SAFE has met increased resistance. Committees have
gutted key provisions and added language that would
sharply increase encryption regulations for Americans."

(New York Times Op-ed piece 9/24/97)

And the following day in the News section:

"WASHINGTON The House Commerce Committee put the brakes on a
fast-moving plan to put the first-ever domestic controls on data
scrambling technology, rejecting 35 to 16 a Federal Bureau of
Investigation-backed proposal to require all American computer
users to register the codes to their encrypted software."

This committee by the way was in a Republican-controlled house.

So pull your head out. And stop dismissing others who simply disagree


with you, you butthole. Your view of history seems a bit misguided to


smugly call other people names.

C


It was drafted by a Republican and legalized under the Clinton
administration (one of the few things done right). The bill was
supported by a minority of republicans, by the way. You should look
into government policy prior 1998.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dangers of Remailers Alex Astronomy Misc 7 February 16th 05 06:37 PM
The Challenges of Getting to Mars: Weather Dangers and Delays Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 0 September 19th 03 01:06 AM
NASA to install Anonymous Remailers Craig Fink Space Shuttle 1 August 2nd 03 07:20 AM
NASA to install Anonymous Remailers Craig Fink Space Station 0 August 2nd 03 02:39 AM
Dangers with solar projection? Rune Allnor Amateur Astronomy 7 July 17th 03 12:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.