|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dangers of Remailers
Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're misinformed. Clinton legalized the public use of RSA and PGP encryption against the wishes of the NSA and Republican congress. You know nothing, idiot. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John Schoenfeld wrote:
Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're misinformed. Clinton legalized the public use of RSA and PGP encryption against the wishes of the NSA and Republican congress. You know nothing, idiot. Dumbass: PGP never was illegal, and the argument over making it illegal went across party lines. Neither side covered themselves with glory. But the Clinton administration backed off of its own proposals to outlaw or strictly regulate internet encryption: "Representatives Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia, and Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, took a libertarian stance earlier this year when they introduced a bill they called Security and Freedom through Encryption. The legislation, known by the acronym SAFE, would have liberalized export controls to allow the United States software industry to compete internationally, and it would have added new criminal penalties for anyone who used encryption in the commission of a crime. It quickly attracted more than 250 co-sponsors. But under heavy lobbying by the Clinton administration, SAFE has met increased resistance. Committees have gutted key provisions and added language that would sharply increase encryption regulations for Americans." (New York Times Op-ed piece 9/24/97) And the following day in the News section: "WASHINGTON The House Commerce Committee put the brakes on a fast-moving plan to put the first-ever domestic controls on data scrambling technology, rejecting 35 to 16 a Federal Bureau of Investigation-backed proposal to require all American computer users to register the codes to their encrypted software." This committee by the way was in a Republican-controlled house. So pull your head out. And stop dismissing others who simply disagree with you, you butthole. Your view of history seems a bit misguided to smugly call other people names. C |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
starburst wrote: John Schoenfeld wrote: Anyone who believes that PGP/Mix or other military-grade encrypted messages and their authors are magically "exempt" from government decryption and surveillance, respectively, then they're misinformed. Clinton legalized the public use of RSA and PGP encryption against the wishes of the NSA and Republican congress. You know nothing, idiot. Dumbass: PGP never was illegal, and the argument over making it illegal went across party lines. Neither side covered themselves with glory. But the Clinton administration backed off of its own proposals to outlaw or strictly regulate internet encryption: "Representatives Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia, and Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, took a libertarian stance earlier this year when they introduced a bill they called Security and Freedom through Encryption. The legislation, known by the acronym SAFE, would have liberalized export controls to allow the United States software industry to compete internationally, and it would have added new criminal penalties for anyone who used encryption in the commission of a crime. It quickly attracted more than 250 co-sponsors. But under heavy lobbying by the Clinton administration, SAFE has met increased resistance. Committees have gutted key provisions and added language that would sharply increase encryption regulations for Americans." (New York Times Op-ed piece 9/24/97) And the following day in the News section: "WASHINGTON The House Commerce Committee put the brakes on a fast-moving plan to put the first-ever domestic controls on data scrambling technology, rejecting 35 to 16 a Federal Bureau of Investigation-backed proposal to require all American computer users to register the codes to their encrypted software." This committee by the way was in a Republican-controlled house. So pull your head out. And stop dismissing others who simply disagree with you, you butthole. Your view of history seems a bit misguided to smugly call other people names. C It was drafted by a Republican and legalized under the Clinton administration (one of the few things done right). The bill was supported by a minority of republicans, by the way. You should look into government policy prior 1998. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dangers of Remailers | Alex | Astronomy Misc | 7 | February 16th 05 06:37 PM |
The Challenges of Getting to Mars: Weather Dangers and Delays | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 19th 03 01:06 AM |
NASA to install Anonymous Remailers | Craig Fink | Space Shuttle | 1 | August 2nd 03 07:20 AM |
NASA to install Anonymous Remailers | Craig Fink | Space Station | 0 | August 2nd 03 02:39 AM |
Dangers with solar projection? | Rune Allnor | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | July 17th 03 12:52 AM |