|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
All: Question marks (?) showed in my text because they were originally
epsilon and sigma. epsilon is the infrared emissivity. sigma is Boltzmann's constant. "Angelo Campanella" wrote in message ... "bjacoby" wrote in message ... NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers: I calculate 0.011 degrees C to date: Poles are very cold. Therefor heat conducted from the molten and hot core is negligible. 1 gram-calorie=4.185 watt-seconds (joules) 15066 251.9970768 Exojoule = 10^18 joules 1.00E+18 Annual US consumption has been (Exojoules): yr USA World(including biomass) 1850 3.5 10.5 1900 13 39 1950 38 114 1970 250 Exojoule is 1E+18 joules 1987 81 300 2000 100 400 2010 500 Sunlight delivers 1,367 W/m^2 to all of earth Earth Circuference is 40,000 km by defiition. Radius is: 6366.197724 km = 6.366E+06 m DiscArea is 1.273E+14 m^2 seconds/yr: Power intercepted is: 1.741E+17 watts max 31557600 Energy intercepted: A joule is also a watt-second. one year= 3.15576E+07 seconds, or 5.493E+24 Joules sunlight each year But the earth's albedo is 0.36 (64% of incident energy is retained, the remaining 36% is reflected by clouds, seas and terrain back into space). Retained = 3.515E+24 joules/yr 3.515E+06 Exojoules/yr This is eight thousand times more than the combustion engery released annually by present civilization. Boltzmann's equation Annual P=A??T^4 ?=5.67x10^-8 J/(s m^2 T^4) P=3.5E+6 ?=P/(A*?*T^4) ?="infrared emmissitvity") T=59F=15C=288K 8.8E-01 0.88 ?="infrared emmissitvity") A=4piR^2= 5.1E+14 What temperature differntial can exist on the average due to the addition of 500 exojoules annually (Yr2010 datum)? delta=K(T2/T1-1) Let E2/E1=T2^4/T1^4: E2/E1= 1.0001422 (T2/T1)^4= 0.0102404 when dT= 2.949234129 C and T1 is 288 Kelvin T1 and E1 be the earth temperature and surface energy deposition due to sulight (no civilization). T2 be the earth temperature and surface energy deposition with sunlight plus present civilization and their combustion activities. ALL the heat deposted on the earth's surface (plus that from vulcanism) is lost to space by only one mechanism; infrared black body radiation. Stephan Boltzmann Law says that the electromagnetic radiation from a hot Black Body is E=?*?*A*T^4 whe ? is the Stephan-Boltzmann Constant, 5.67*10^-8 J/s*m^2*k^4) ? is the infrared emissivity of that body computed above as 0.88 Earth SurfaceArea is A=4*pi*R^2 = 5.1E+14 m^2 dE/dT=4*?*?*A*T^3; dT=dE/(4*?*?*A*T^3)= 1.110E-02 degees C.! This is trifling. Estmate of Temp Rise via ratios: E2/E1=(T2/T1)^4. 0.0102404 The next thing to study is the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere on ?, the infrared emissinvity (IR albedo?) of the Earth (presently 0.88). My answer is that more CO2 will cool the earth overall as that will increase the infrared emissivity of the earth as a whole. It could as well redistibute te heat a bit. For one, it will lead to cooler stratospheres etc. Kepp you suppliy of snuggies. Well, clearly warmist science-deniers are getting ready for the next phase of the "global warming" battle. How many climate skeptics are there out there? I'm not qa skeeptic. I am a knower. I know it's o.01 degrees celsius to date. And if we stopburing things, that 0.011 degrees C goes away. Forget about GW. Its fiction. point bullets ought to be enough to enforce a "consensus" and "final solution" on the "global warming question". I think it's a budget move, buying inventory ahead of the price rise. "The DOC NOAA National Weather Service - Western Acquisition Division - Boulder requires the following items, Purchase Description Determined by Line Item, to the following: LI 001, 16,000 rounds of ammunition for semiautomatic pistols to be factory-loaded .40 S&W caliber, 180-grain jacketed hollow point (JHP). No reloads may be used with these weapons. All service furnished ammunition for issued firearms will be U.S. factory production. I think it's for personal protecton of federal agents, EPA, etc. Ange |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
David Friedman wrote:
Republicans who object that Romney is too much of a statist can always vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. It's what I plan to do. If he ends up getting several percent of the vote, which would be a record for an LP presidential candidate, that might suggest to one or both of the major parties that they could benefit by modifying some of their policies in a libertarian direction. Never happen. Ever. Both the Democrats and Republicans encourage the disaffected to join and vote for 3rd parties. That way the major parties can get on with the business of governing without having to put up with the kooks. Have you ever heard of a Republican official plead with a Libertarian that the GOP will certainly give his group a fair hearing if only he'll support a GOP ticket? Or a similar Democratic factotum make a similar plea to a Communist? The major parties don't WANT screwballs in their midst and are thankful that the weird just go away. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
On Aug 19, 8:47*am, "Sanders Kaufman" wrote:
wrote in message ... In order to vote AGAINST 0bama you must now vote FOR Romney, not some We should make special affirmative action ballots for the Republicans - so that instead of having to vote FOR stuff, they can follow their conscience and just vote against a bunch of stuff. That's the basic idea of being a conservative and favoring minimal government... vote against. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
On Aug 19, 11:19*am, David Friedman
wrote: In article , *Martin Brown wrote: On 19/08/2012 13:47, Sanders Kaufman wrote: wrote in message .... In order to vote AGAINST 0bama you must now vote FOR Romney, not some We should make special affirmative action ballots for the Republicans - so that instead of having to vote FOR stuff, they can follow their conscience and just vote against a bunch of stuff. They could always spoil their ballot papers resulting in a counted vote for "none of the above" or vote for some fringe candidate. Republicans who object that Romney is too much of a statist can always vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. What would be the point of voting for the Libertarian if he can't possibly win? It's what I plan to do. Then you must be an idiot. If he ends up getting several percent of the vote, which would be a record for an LP presidential candidate, that might suggest to one or both of the major parties that they could benefit by modifying some of their policies in a libertarian direction. Many Republicans already lean that way, but unfortunately just not far enough to be truly conservative. The long-standing Democrat strategy has been to promise "redistribution of wealth" along with other vote- buying tactics and don't expect them to change. Their supporters expect a hand-out. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
On Aug 19, 4:07*pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
David Friedman wrote: Republicans who object that Romney is too much of a statist can always vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. It's what I plan to do. If he ends up getting several percent of the vote, which would be a record for an LP presidential candidate, that might suggest to one or both of the major parties that they could benefit by modifying some of their policies in a libertarian direction. Never happen. Ever. Both the Democrats and Republicans encourage the disaffected to join and vote for 3rd parties. That way the major parties can get on with the business of governing without having to put up with the kooks. Have you ever heard of a Republican official plead with a Libertarian that the GOP will certainly give his group a fair hearing if only he'll support a GOP ticket? Or a similar Democratic factotum make a similar plea to a Communist? The major parties don't WANT screwballs in their midst and are thankful that the weird just go away. So how do you explain Pelosi? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
On Aug 21, 8:04*pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
wrote: On Aug 19, 4:07 pm, "HeyBub" wrote: David Friedman wrote: Republicans who object that Romney is too much of a statist can always vote for Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. It's what I plan to do. If he ends up getting several percent of the vote, which would be a record for an LP presidential candidate, that might suggest to one or both of the major parties that they could benefit by modifying some of their policies in a libertarian direction. Never happen. Ever. Both the Democrats and Republicans encourage the disaffected to join and vote for 3rd parties. That way the major parties can get on with the business of governing without having to put up with the kooks. Have you ever heard of a Republican official plead with a Libertarian that the GOP will certainly give his group a fair hearing if only he'll support a GOP ticket? Or a similar Democratic factotum make a similar plea to a Communist? The major parties don't WANT screwballs in their midst and are thankful that the weird just go away. So how do you explain Pelosi? San Francisco is the exception to many rules, including this one. Now explain Biden, 0bama, Franken, Reid, etc. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
NOAA Getting Ready to Follow Dr. Hansen's Advice and Kill Warming Non-believers:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOAA satellites ready for active hurricane season (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | June 22nd 07 03:34 PM |
I solved global warming, wrote a book on world peace, and still want to kill myself | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 16 | June 17th 07 04:39 AM |
Follow people, public enemy #1, follow kookets, label biiggets kooket masses, follow and label | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 20 | April 21st 07 01:42 AM |
Solar warming v. Global warming | Roger Steer | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
Global warming v. Solar warming | Roger Steer | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 18th 05 10:58 AM |