A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein-Free Physics: Logical Foundations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 6th 20, 09:19 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein-Free Physics: Logical Foundations

Two crucial biconditionals (if-and-only-if propositions):

Biconditional 1: The speed of light is constant as per Einstein IF AND ONLY IF the wavelength of light is variable.

Biconditional 2: The speed of light is variable as per Newton IF AND ONLY IF the wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter.

Both biconditionals are immediate logical consequences of the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength)

Both the antecedent and the consequent in Biconditional 2 are true. The consequent,

"the wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter",

will become the fundamental axiom of future, Einstein-free physics.

The fundamental axiom of Einstein's physics is "the speed of light is constant", the antecedent in Biconditional 1:

"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old September 6th 20, 10:23 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein-Free Physics: Logical Foundations

Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate is the fundamental axiom of modern physics (see the two texts below). Accordingly, if this axiom is false (it is!), physics is long dead (exists as a farce/ideology):

"If there's one thing every schoolboy knows about Einstein and his theory of relativity, it is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. No matter what the circumstances, light in vacuum travels at the same speed... The speed of light is the very keystone of physics, the seemingly sure foundation upon which every modern cosmological theory is built, the yardstick by which everything in the universe is measured. [...] The only aspect of the universe that didn't change was the speed of light. And ever since, the constancy of the speed of light has been woven into the very fabric of physics, into the way physics equations are written, even into the notation used. Nowadays, to "vary" the speed of light is not even a swear word: It is simply not present in the vocabulary of physics." https://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-S.../dp/0738205257

Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi: "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light...So we had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard..vice.com/en_us/...t-speed-slowed

The formula

(Frequency) = (Speed of light) / (Wavelength)

allows the introduction of two axioms that push physics in opposite directions:

Axiom 1 (Einstein's physics): The speed of light is constant. Immediate corollary (obviously absurd): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift.

Axiom 2 (Einstein-free physics): The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Immediate corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Axiom 1, false and even nonsensical, killed physics (converted it into an insane ideology).

Axiom 2 is correct. It will resurrect physics (if it's not too late). Its immediate corollary will become the main law of the new science.

Five important corollaries of Axiom 2:

Corollary 1 (the fundamental law of future physics): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.

Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes.

Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is static, not expanding.

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logical Foundations of Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 August 27th 20 08:12 AM
Einstein's Physics Is Absurd. Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 24th 20 08:28 PM
The Difference Between Einstein's Physics and Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 18th 20 12:55 AM
Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 1st 20 01:40 AM
Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 13th 19 10:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.