A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Multiverse?, A simulation ? Nah---Only In Some SciFi Minds AndHollywood Perhaps



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 9th 04, 08:11 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multiverse?, A simulation ? Nah---Only In Some SciFi Minds AndHollywood Perhaps

nightbat wrote


Ray Vingnutte wrote:

Two or three years ago I came across these ideas, at first I thought oh
yeah, come on, but you know it has sort of grown on me. As Hoyle was
supposedly once to have said ' it's a put-up job' referring to the
universe.

The more I learn about the universe the more it makes me wonder, this is
a put-up job isn't it?.



nightbat

Well Ray, from a theoretical Sir Fred Hoyle sci fi steady
state one perhaps versus from a nightbat formidable basic disturbed
multi overlapping field one trying to normalize, but in either case, the
former nullifying because of energy's nature. Now if scientist's could
ascertain cause of outside force to explain original imputed non uniform
force impetus or equal or greater neutralizing force potential, no
outside designer is necessary. Sir Hoyle was a great astrophysicist,
mathematician, sci fi theorist and with some scientific associates
formulated a great many valuable interesting papers, publications, and
observations including to be within limits of steady state premise. But
the Universe is not Einstein cosmological constant static, or single all
originating point energy negating Big Bang, despite cosmic background
radiation, or in a Hoyle and Co's. proposed steady state condition, but
a nightbat constant flex or disturbed momentum one.

I know, then when does the scientific peer reviewed paper or multi
interest addressed exciting books come out to the local bookstore
nearest you? When does the World finally get the GUT that makes easy
reading sense, so insightful Double-A and the rest of the star gazers
can sleep better? Why did this simple premise miss the great minds of
some of the most enlightened scientist's of the 20th century?

Well for one, who took unanimous usenet posters seriously, and who has
the time to appease the formal most demanding main stream process when
you're so busy applying your working model to further discovery? Who
wants to be made an authority with it's famous Einstein's Nobel and
reported curse of lost of privacy and free research time? So why did
they miss it, they were just as theoretically busy as nightbat but more
inclined to academic plus fame acceptance notoriety, formal book
publishing schedules and demands, and most, ha, ha, just didn't make it
into the 21st century.



the nightbat

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiverse?, A simulation ? Greysky Misc 0 September 9th 04 05:38 AM
ATV simulation facility will be first to 'fly' very complex mission(Forwarded) Andrew Yee Space Station 0 November 15th 03 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.