A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LIGO Fakers Know No Limits



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 20, 02:42 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default LIGO Fakers Know No Limits

"'It's mindboggling!': Astronomers detect most powerful black-hole collision yet. Gravitational wave detections suggest merging black holes fell into ‘forbidden’ range of masses." https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02524-w

The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime). LIGO fakers still feel safe (post-truth science) but in the long run they are doomed:

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf

"Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-It.../dp/0486406768

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old September 2nd 20, 09:33 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default LIGO Fakers Know No Limits

Theoreticians repudiate Einstein's spacetime, declare that it does not exist, but worship the underlying premise, Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate, and LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime):

Nima Arkani-Hamed: "Almost all of us believe that spacetime doesn't really exist, spacetime is doomed and has to be replaced..." https://youtu.be/U47kyV4TMnE?t=369

Philip Ball: "And by making the clock's tick relative - what happens simultaneously for one observer might seem sequential to another - Einstein's theory of special relativity not only destroyed any notion of absolute time but made time equivalent to a dimension in space: the future is already out there waiting for us; we just can't see it until we get there. This view is a logical and metaphysical dead end, says Smolin." http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013...reality-review

"Was Einstein wrong? At least in his understanding of time, Smolin argues, the great theorist of relativity was dead wrong. What is worse, by firmly enshrining his error in scientific orthodoxy, Einstein trapped his successors in insoluble dilemmas..." https://www.amazon.com/Time-Reborn-C.../dp/B00AEGQPFE

Nobel Laureate David Gross observed, "Everyone in string theory is convinced...that spacetime is doomed. But we don't know what it's replaced by." https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26563

What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime... [...] The apparent need to retire classical spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..." https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25477

"Rethinking Einstein: The end of space-time. [...] Horava, who is at the University of California, Berkeley, wants to rip this fabric apart and set time and space free from one another in order to come up with a unified theory that reconciles the disparate worlds of quantum mechanics and gravity - one the most pressing challenges to modern physics." https://www.newscientist.com/article...of-space-time/

"We've known for decades that space-time is doomed," says Arkani-Hamed. "We know it is not there in the next version of physics." http://discovermagazine.com/2014/jan...ure-of-physics

So spacetime "doesn't really exist" and "is not there in the next version of physics", but LIGO's ripples in spacetime do exist and will be there in the next version of physics, like the grin of the Cheshire Cat (otherwise LIGO fakers will have to go to jail):

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1J-7PIffiL.jpg

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old September 3rd 20, 10:01 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default LIGO Fakers Know No Limits

LIGO's gravitational wave fabrication is hopefully the final episode in the century-long series of swindles committed by the Einstein cult (most Einsteinians are silently leaving Einstein's sinking ship nowadays).

"On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30

"Just two seconds later" and "the same location of the sky" implies that gravitational waves and optical signals traveled hand in hand: the same gravitationally deflected path, the same speed, the same Shapiro delay. Weird implications triggering no discussion at all. Post-truth (dead) science.

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LIGO Fakes Deliver Deathblow to LIGO Conspiracy, Not to Alternative Theories Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 October 26th 17 09:12 AM
LIGO Conspirators Know No Limits Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 4 April 20th 16 10:43 AM
Limits of the Possible G=EMC^2 Misc 4 June 27th 11 04:42 AM
Limits of Spectroscopy Abdul Ahad Misc 43 March 9th 04 08:14 PM
Limits of Spectroscopy Abdul Ahad UK Astronomy 40 March 9th 04 08:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.